Anonymous ID: NOjYqEdl No.148457032 📁
Nov 7 2017 19:05:59 (EST)
The graphic is your key.
Let's pause and say hello to the rogue intelligence agencies currently monitoring these threads.
Was the money worth it?
Titanic.
Q
Anonymous ID: NOjYqEdl No.148457032 📁
Nov 7 2017 19:05:59 (EST)
The graphic is your key.
Let's pause and say hello to the rogue intelligence agencies currently monitoring these threads.
Was the money worth it?
Titanic.
Q
https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/113630910640604109
It will happen so fast that they won't even know what hit them!
Judgement
Everything said that will, Will!
Follow the Pen
I testified to Congress the Press Act’s broad definition of journalist protects independent reporters + small newsrooms who are the lifeblood @X + TruthSocial.
Without these protections, free speech + new, diverse voices can be lawfared out of existence. @SenTomCotton
✍️- Catherine Herridge (https://x.com/c__herridge/status/1866610636009898362?s=61&t=BdBkJAWYzheOiIIylkbO1g)
The White House threatened to veto once-bipartisan legislation to expand the federal judiciary for the first time in decades, joining congressional Democrats who have turned against the bill following President-elect Donald Trump’s victory.
In a statement of administration policy released Tuesday, the Biden administration said it opposes the Senate-passed bill (S. 4199) to add dozens of federal trial court judges, in phases, over the next decade to help courts facing ballooning caseloads.
The legislation would represent the first broad expansion of the courts since 1990, and the first time any additional permanent judgeship has been authorized in over two decades.
The White House said the bill is “unnecessary to the efficient and effective administration of justice.”
“The bill would create new judgeships in states where Senators have sought to hold open existing judicial vacancies,” the statement said. “Those efforts to hold open vacancies suggest that concerns about judicial economy and caseload are not the true motivating force behind passage of this bill now.”
READ (https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/white-house-threatens-to-veto-bill-adding-federal-trial-judges) | XPOST (https://x.com/dotconnectinga/status/1866618691938357462?s=61&t=BdBkJAWYzheOiIIylkbO1g)
On Monday, District Judge Daniel Traynor granted a preliminary injunction and stay to ensure that Biden’s agencies cannot implement such plans while the issue makes its way through federal court.
“This decision is a big win for the rule of law,” Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach (R), who led the lawsuit, said in a statement:
Congress never intended that illegal aliens should receive Obamacare benefits. Indeed, two laws prohibit them from receiving such benefits. The Biden administration tried to break those laws. But we fought back and defeated the Biden Justice Department. [Emphasis added]
Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Florida, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia had joined Kansas in the lawsuit against the Biden-Harris administration.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/10/federal-judge-stops-biden-agencies-from-opening-obamacare-to-illegals/