>>22150762
Thanks again. I re-looked.
It's when checking news reports. Not necessarily referencing q posts.
But think of this:
We already know Q gave us disinfo
"Trust Wray"
etc. etc.
"2020 will be Glorious"
keke
HRC will be arrested on such and such a date.
"Trust Kansas"
kek
more context for the "disinfo" statement:
"Operators Active
Disinformation is Real
Disinformation is necessary.."
so in the context of larger operations, where lives are at stake, mis-direction, and secrecy are necessary.
And Q team also mentioned, elsewhere, that the enemy reads this board;
so logically, yes! there would not be transparency in the messages.
But then we were also given "Q proofs" and told they were important.
(picrel)
someone is reading reflections off a watch to show the watch is in the Oval office?
Q team also mentioned that the photos they gave us were unique and not accessible;
And that was proved by searches on the images.
Q asked "What does that mean"?
Some of the images had strange format; black on edges, Unsure why.