missing [S]
there are quite a few [S] posts in the Q drops
CDC Rolls Out 200 “Routine Vaccines” for 2025. Compare to 7 Injections for Children in 1986, Zero for Adults
The CDC just published its 2025 vaccine schedules. The CDC has now gone from 7 routine vaccine injections in 1986 to over 200 routine vaccine injections in 2025.
In 1986, before vaccine makers had broad immunity to liability for injuries, CDC’s schedule had 7 routine childhood injections and none for adults or pregnant women. CDC’s 2025 schedule has over 70 routine childhood injections (birth to age 18), 5 routine injections during pregnancy, and over 130 routine adult injections (up to age 79). Counting non-routine injections, there are even more.
more…
https://needtoknow.news/2024/12/cdc-rolls-out-200-routine-vaccines-for-2025-compare-to-7-injections-for-children-in-1983-zero-for-adults/
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-12-11-cdc-rolls-out-200-routine-vaccines-for-2025.html
"suicide"
OpenAI whistleblower found dead
Suchir Balaji committed suicide a few weeks ago, a medical examiner has told CNBC
A former OpenAI employee who claimed the company had violated copyright laws during work on its ChatGPT chatbot has been found dead, CNBC and other outlets have reported.
Suchir Balaji died several weeks ago, and “the manner of death has been determined to be suicide,” David Serrano Sewell, executive director of San Francisco’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, told the broadcaster on Friday.
According to San Francisco police, officers discovered the whistleblower’s body during a “wellbeing check” at an apartment on Buchanan Street on November 26. “No evidence of foul play” was found during the initial investigation, they said.
Balaji’s untimely demise comes three months after he publicly accused OpenAI of violating US copyright law during the development of the ChatGPT large language model.
The information that the 26-year-old possessed was believed to have been crucial to multiple lawsuits filed against the San-Francisco-based firm by publishers, authors and artists, which claim that OpenAI used their data without authorization.
READ MORE: ChatGPT maker secretly developing new type of AI – Reuters
When approached for comment by CNBC, a spokesperson for OpenAI said “we are devastated to learn of this incredibly sad news today and our hearts go out to Suchir’s loved ones during this difficult time.”
https://www.rt.com/news/609349-openai-employee-found-dead/
wtf are they up to???
Officials Issue Warning After Oddly Colored Snow Falls on Town: ‘Avoid Ingesting or Direct Skin Contact’
The picturesque sight of snow blanketing a Maine town became something far less attractive.
On Tuesday, residents of Rumford found that instead of fluffy white stuff covering yards and fields, they looked upon brown snow, according to WJW-TV
The town posted an explanation on Facebook, saying the local paper mill was to blame.
“The Town has confirmed that due to a malfunction at the Mill there was a release of spent black liquor which resulted in precipitation of brown or tan colored snow. This is mostly in the areas of Town nearest to the Mill,” it posted.
The post said the snow should be left alone.
“The pH of this substance is 10 which is alkali and therefore a skin irritant. Although it is non-toxic it should not be touched or otherwise put in contact with skin,” the post said.
“We have been in contact with the Mill and they have already rectified the issue and have informed their regulators. In the meantime we are also notifying the school district to let kids know not to play with ‘brown snow,’” the post said.
“It is likely advisable to keep your pets away from this snow. We are hopeful the rain tomorrow will wash most of the substance away and flush it off the ground and people’s homes or property,” the post said.
The post said that Maine Department of Environmental Protection tests showed the pH of the snow was around 8, compared to water, which has a pH of 7.
TOXIC SNOW ⚠️Rumford, Maine, Sees Brown Snowfall Due to Paper Mill Malfunction
As snow blanketed Rumford, Maine, residents noticed an unusual sight—brown snow falling from the sky. The discoloration was caused by a malfunction at a local paper mill, which released spent black… pic.twitter.com/3ab35ZqI5N
— Kristy Tallman (@KristyTallman) December 12, 2024
Based on state guidance, the post explained that “we are confident that the public safety concerns are minimal at this time.”
“In the meantime out of an abundance of caution please avoid ingesting or direct skin contact with the brown snow,” the post said.
Drones in New Jersey now we have brown snow in Maine. That local officials are warning people to stay away from what is going on? pic.twitter.com/lkujPzX3gk
— Shawn Hendrix (@TheShawnHendrix) December 11, 2024
ND Paper issued a statement taking responsibility for the incident.
It said an operational issue led to the problem that allowed the byproduct to escape, according to WMTW-TV.
“The cause of the operational issues are being, and will continue to be investigated,” the statement said.
The company said it is cooperating with state officials as they investigate the incident.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/officials-issue-warning-oddly-colored-snow-falls-town/
(1/2)
Martha MacCallum Can’t Believe John Kirby’s Outrageous Response to Her Question: ‘Why Not Just Take One Down and Figure Out What’s Going On?’
In a jaw-dropping interview with Fox News’ Martha MacCallum, White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby struggled to provide clear answers about a bizarre and alarming series of drone sightings in New Jersey.
MacCallum, unimpressed by Kirby’s evasions, grilled him relentlessly on why the administration hasn’t even bothered to shoot down one of these drones to uncover their origins.
Instead of providing clarity, Kirby fumbled through talking points about “policy options” and “inter-agency conversations.” His repeated refrain of “we don’t know” underscored what critics have described as the Biden administration’s signature approach to crises—delay, deflect, and deny.
During the interview, MacCallum confronted Kirby over his outrageous claim during the White House press briefing, where he brushed off more than 3,000 reports of “car-sized drones” as mere misidentifications of helicopters or airplanes.
Martha MacCallum:
A lot of people were unhappy with that comment you made yesterday and felt like you were telling people they were nuts or that they didn’t know what they were seeing with their own eyes.
John Kirby:
No, not at all, Martha. That’s the farthest thing that I would ever do. I was simply reiterating what the FBI and what the Department of Homeland Security have relayed to us about what they’ve been able to corroborate. We haven’t been able to corroborate everything. I said many of the corroborated sightings have turned out to be piloted aircraft. I didn’t say all of them.
And what I said was those are the ones we were able to corroborate. There’s certainly ones that we have not been able to, and we don’t know the answer to it. And I strongly recommend that for folks that are seeing these things and documenting them to share that as they can with Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, the investigator.
Kirby couldn’t even look at the photographic evidence presented during the interview as he conveniently turned off his monitor to avoid distractions. MacCallum called out the absurdity of the situation, asking how a former admiral and current top White House official could dismiss clear visuals of the drones.
Martha MacCallum:
All right, well, let’s do that. Let’s share it with you right now. Let’s put up this photo. This is a close-up one. This is in Bernardsville, New Jersey. John, are you able to see this photo?
John Kirby:
No, ma’am.
Martha MacCallum:
You don’t have a monitor there?
John Kirby:
No, actually, I turned the monitor off. It distracted me, so I didn’t see it.
Martha MacCallum:
All right. Well, you’ll have to take a look at it after, but I can describe it to you. It is large. It has a white bar that goes through the middle. The right-hand side is half-lit up white on the top and red on the bottom. The other side is green. You’re a former military person yourself. You’re an admiral. You’re the White House National Security Communications Advisor. I’m sure you’ve seen some of these images. What is it that we’re looking at?
John Kirby:
It’s difficult for me to tell you, Martha. We don’t really know. It’s possible that some of these things could be commercial drones developed for commercial purposes. It’s also possible that they could be owned by private citizens.
During the interview, MacCallum revisited the infamous Chinese spy balloon in 2023, which was allowed to drift across the entire U.S. before being shot down over the Atlantic.
The Biden regime was aware of the Chinese spy balloon in US airspace before reports of it hit the news.
The Biden administration initially ignored the threat, hoping the balloon would not be detected. But after amateur photographers captured the balloon flying over Montana, Biden White House had to admit they knew about the balloon.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said the U.S. military had to shut down communications and movements last week as the China spy balloon flew over strategic military bases during its week-long flyover of the United States from Alaska to South Carolina. The balloon was only shot down after it went offshore. Joe Biden claimed the spy balloon gathering intel over US military bases was “not a major breach.”
Then, the National Security Council finally admitted that the Chinese spy balloon was able to gather intelligence from several sensitive American military bases.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/martha-maccallum-cant-believe-john-kirbys-outrageous-response/
(2/2)
Martha MacCallum:
Why don’t we know, John? That’s the point. Why doesn’t the United States government know? It seems silly. It feels a lot like the Chinese spy balloon. At first, it was like, “Oh, we don’t know, it’s not a problem.” Then we watched it go all the way across the country, and we kept hearing, “We’re not really sure where it came from,” until we saw it pop and float down over the ocean.
John Kirby:
That’s not quite how it went. We were very honest with the American people that we knew it was Chinese, and we knew where it was going to go. We were pretty comfortable given the analysis that there wasn’t going to be an intelligence we were threatened by it. Again, we shot it down once it was over safe waters and it wasn’t going to hurt anybody.
But back to this, why don’t we know? I wish I could tell you exactly why we don’t have an answer for you here in the afternoon on the 13th of December. But I can tell you that we are working on it very, very hard to know because we want to answer those questions the same as those folks in New Jersey want answers to them. We are working on this very, very hard. We are now applying.
There was an inter-agency conversation this morning about this topic where we have now to employ some additional technology to New Jersey and some additional personnel to try to get a better sense of what these things are. As I said yesterday, Martha, as soon as we know, we’re going to be transparent as we can.
MacCallum blasted Kirby on how an administration presiding over an $824 billion defense budget not have basic answers about objects invading American airspace.
MacCallum asked if the administration had considered shooting down one of the drones to finally get some answers. Kirby said they couldn’t do it because “it could hit somebody’s house or hurt somebody.”
Kirby’s reluctance to shoot down one of these drones, even over safe waters, citing policy and safety concerns, only adds to the frustration. With drones reportedly following a U.S. Coast Guard ship, the question of national security becomes even more pressing. What are we waiting for? Another potential espionage incident?
Martha MacCallum:
I got to tell you, this is shocking. I’m not the only person who feels this way. This was happening at Langley a month ago. These people are not crazy. They’re seeing these things with their own eyes. This is not normal behavior. They’re not planes that are coming in one direction, and they’re heading into Newark Airport, and then they’re landing. We spend $824 billion on defense. We have the greatest intelligent capability in the world. How can you stand there and say to the country right now, Gosh, darn, we just don’t know what these are.
John Kirby:
Because I’m not going to lie to you or to the American people, and I’m not going to say we know something when we don’t. We would never, ever stoop to think that an American citizen was crazy or because of what they’re seeing and what they’re documenting. We’re taking that imagery seriously, and we’re doing the best we can to analyze it, and we encourage people to come forward if they have additional sightings and imagery. We want to do the best we can to triangulate it, but I’ll be, Gosh, darn. If I’m going to stand up here and make up stuff that I don’t know to be true.
Martha MacCallum:
We don’t want you to make up anything. Do you know and you can’t say? Can you tell me that?
John Kirby:
No, Martha, I’m telling you we don’t know. We can’t corroborate every single sighting. Some of them we have. Not all of them. We’re working hard to do that. We know people are afraid of it. We know people have concerns. We have those same concerns.
(3/2)kek
Martha MacCallum:
Yeah, because they’re flying over your house, and it sounds like there are motor cycles landing on your roof. Let me ask you this. One person who watched this online said they think it’s a Taradynamics transwing drone XP-4, which is being developed by the US Navy as a recon and logistics drone, capable of picking up and dropping off packages between land and moving ships in high seas and winds.
They’re suggesting it’s an American company. We asked the company. They said, We can’t speculate on the origin of the drones that are flying over New Jersey. Is that an avenue that has been inspected? Is this a private company that is practicing something? And wouldn’t they have to clear something with somebody to have this activity?
John Kirby:
It could very well be. As I said. These could be commercially developed drones of some kind.
Martha MacCallum:
Why not just take one down and figure out what’s going on?
John Kirby:
Well, okay, the idea of taking something down, again, you want to worry about public safety. First of all, we don’t have enough conclusions to take that a policy action. But let’s just assume for a minute, Martha, that we did. I mean, you’re not going to want to shoot something down where it could hit somebody’s house or hurt somebody.
Martha MacCallum:
Well, the Coast Guard says that there are 30 of them following one of their ships in the ocean. So would that work?
John Kirby:
I mean, again, we have to develop the policy options based on what we know we’re dealing with here, and we just don’t know enough to take those kinds of actions.
Martha MacCallum:
Wow
John Kirby:
But my goodness, we’re going to do everything we can to find out, and we’re going to share as much as we can. I understand it’s frustrating for folks.
Martha MacCallum::
Yeah
John Kirby:
It’s frustrating for us. We want to know as well.
Kirby assured MacCallum that the President has “tasked the team” to investigate the drones. But how can Americans trust this administration when transparency has been virtually nonexistent? From the chaotic withdrawal in Afghanistan to now ignoring drones over U.S. soil, it’s clear this administration prioritizes spin over substance.
MacCallum’s final question drove the point home: “When are we going to have answers?” Kirby couldn’t even provide a timeline, instead doubling down on vague assurances of “working hard.” That’s not good enough for a nation that deserves leadership—not excuses.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/martha-maccallum-cant-believe-john-kirbys-outrageous-response/
>NASA’s Perseverance Rover Reaches Top of Jezero Crater Rim
or
NASA publishes photos of New Mexico desert