Newfag here, but have been researching for a while.

The R legal post is for sure an interesting read, and goes hand

in hand with what ive been reseaching for the last 2 years.

This is my Breakdown of the post part 1…

<1913

<Federal Reserve Act

<Federal Reserve Inc.

<A Private Company?

<Shareholders = ?

<IS THIS Constitutional?

<IS THIS LEGAL

<Are You A DEBT SLAVE?

<What is your recourse?

<What is a Federal Reserve Note?

<Define NOTE

<COLORABLE MONEY COLORABLE COURTS

The United States of America had been without a central bank since the charter of the Second Bank of the United States had expired in 1836.

The Federal Reserve Act was passed because public confidence in the US banking system was extremely low due to the collapse of small banks during periods of depression in which many Americans had lost their homes, businesses and life savings. There was no central bank and Wilson decided to take action to centralize the system, control American monetary policy and restore the confidence of Americans in banks. The law became commonly referred to as the Currency Bill.

^ What they dont tell you is the reason the first and second bank of the united states and all lesser banks were unstable. They left out the government interferance as to the limits of money they could hold, lend, etc.. causing bank runs and subsequent instability.

Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.

As you can see the Fed res. shareholders are other banks, in turn it

all leads back to rothschild and the bank of england.

The J. Henry Schroder Banking Company chart encompasses the entire history of the twentieth century, embracing as it does the program (Belgium Relief Commission) which provisioned Germany from 1915-1918 and dissuaded Germany from seeking peace in 1916; financing Hitler in 1933 so as to make a Second World War possible; backing the Presidential campaign of Herbert Hoover ; and even at the present time, having two of its major executives of its subsidiary firm, Bechtel Corporation serving as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State in the Reagan Administration.

The head of the Bank of England since 1973, Sir Gordon Richardson, Governor of the Bank of England (controlled by the House of Rothschild) was chairman of J. Henry Schroder Wagg and Company of London from 1963-72, and director of J. Henry Schroder,New York and Schroder Banking Corporation,New York,as well as Lloyd's Bank of London, and Rolls Royce. He maintains a residence on Sutton Place in New York City, and as head of "The London Connection," can be said to be the single most influential banker in the world.

this rabbit hole had some big names tying in to the government and corporate

millionaires

The Fed reserve act IS unconstitutional because ONLY congress has the power to coin money.

Congress created the Federal Reserve, yet it had no constitutional authority to do so. We forget that those powers not explicitly granted to Congress by the Constitution are inherently denied to Congress and thus the authority to establish a central bank never was given. = ILLEGAL.

Every Dollar in exsistance is Debt to the fed.

If you have the only dollar in the world, and loan me the dollar

with interest. I have to borrow another dollar to pay back my debt…

the cycle becomes an endless loop of borrowing to pay back.

We are debt slaves, in perpetuity.

A recourse is a legal agreement which gives the lender the right to pledged collateral in the event that the borrower is unable to satisfy the debt obligation. Recourse refers to the legal right to collect.

so in this situation the only one that benefits from recourse is the

lender. if not payed their "Debt" they will collect "take possesion

of pledged "collateral"

Federal Reserve Notes, also United States banknotes or U.S. banknotes, are the banknotes currently used in the United States of America. Denominated in United States dollars, Federal Reserve Notes are printed by the United States Bureau of Engraving and Printing on paper made by Crane & Co. of Dalton, Massachusetts. Federal Reserve Notes are the only type of U.S. banknote currently produced.[1] Federal Reserve Notes are authorized by Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913[2] and are issued to the Federal Reserve Banks at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.[3] The notes are then put into circulation by the Federal Reserve Banks,[4] at which point they become liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks[5] and obligations of the United States.[3]

Notice the last line… obligations of the United States. Yup that's

right 'debt', your obligation to pay back.

Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender, with the words "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" printed on each note.[6] They have replaced United States Notes, which were once issued by the Treasury Department. Federal Reserve Notes are backed by the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, which serve as collateral under Section 16.[7] These assets are generally Treasury securities which have been purchased by the Federal Reserve through its Federal Open Market Committee in a process called debt monetizing.

First line is the kicker… gotta make sure you know what your monopoly

money is used for, since its not a hard asset. Which leads us to "backed assets of the fed reserve. Now i gotta ask WHAT ASSETS DO THEY HAVE?. if they make the money that we use what is it that they use to "purchase treasury securities"?

"Color of law" refers to an appearance of legal power to act that may operate in violation of law. For example, if a police officer acts with the "color of law" authority to arrest someone, the arrest, if it is made without probable cause, may actually be in violation of law.

OK so Color of something is to "Do without true Authority".

so COLORABLE MONEY COLORABLE COURTS…both are used but have no Authority, Value, Substance, etc.. and are illegal.

Anyway this is the first part of his post… am currently working on

the rest.

WWG1WGA

>>2236161

the simple fact that they never did that is my point.

these are events passed fag, history if you will..

you obviously need to take your head out your ass and READ that they never had a leg to stand on and assumption that they could do is not permission.. in the end we were played, plain and simple..

and how about you do that since you dont have time to research fuckin faggot. get to work or get the fuck out!

have a nice night.

>>2237593

My fellow anon i am on the same path you are. i can still remember the day i realized what we really are. I am currently working on the next part of the post. Will post what i have soon. once finished with all, will detail personal exp.

>>2238228

You and your reply are correct, its almost impossible to address this to normies cause its so far fetched sounding. there was a bullshit movement about TDA accounts.. they were just over the mark. the people were only interested in getting the money out not trying to make real change… im slowly working on a good angle to wake people up. any ideas welcome.

Part2 of my R Legal post breakdown.

<1933

<United States Declares BANKRUPTCY

<United States Inc.

<A Private Company?

<Shareholders =?

<CREDITORS=?

<US BANKRUPTCY Still In Receivership?

<Emergency Banking Act March 9 1933

<House Joint Resolution 192 73rd Congress June 5 1933

<1938 Supreme Court - Erie Railroad v Tompkins

<Why is this relevant?

On March 9, 1933, House Joint Resolution No. 192-10 by the 73rd Congress, was voted into law, which is the Emergency Banking Act. This Act declared the Treasury of the United States, ‘Bankrupt’, which is an impossible feat since the U. S. Treasury was secretly closed by the Congress twelve years earlier in 1921. The Emergency Banking Act succeeded in abrogating America’s gold standard and hypothecated all property found within the United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank.

All Sovereign American Citizens residing within the Republic of States suddenly and falsely were expatriated from their Sovereign American status without their knowledge or consent and their labor, souls, children, property, sweat equity and credit became the financial collateral for the public debt, which had then been converted into a Public Trust, which had been scripted after the ancient Roman Trusts.

“Script” money or [negotiable debt instruments] was issued by a private corporation, which is owned by a group of Sabbatean European Jewish Bankers and which is known to everybody as: “The Federal Reserve System.”

yup, claimed we were broke, then took all our stuff. Sounds like their M.O.

In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscript troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today – what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.

If we are the shareholders in this corporation, which has clearly bankrupted itself and us in the process, then we must have the right, under corporate law, even international law, to fire them all, never mind elections. If we are not shareholders and are instead sovereign citizens of our own states, are we obligated to follow any of the laws created by this corporation, nor the body of international law that it follows, outside of the 10 square mile area it has jurisdiction over; nor any of the international ‘treaties’ it purports to sign on our behalf? As sovereign citizens of our states, can we file suit against this corporation, which has illegally usurped the organic Constitution of the United States?

Now for the final blow, the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES as so declared in 1933 with House Joint Resolution 192, also known as HJR 192. In HJR 192, congress outlawed the demand for payment of debts in gold or any particular form. In fact what this did was to place a secret lien against ALL property in America as collateral to the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.This was done without the full knowledge and consent of the American people. As bad as that sounds, the positive side is that the passage of HJR 192 changed the staus of Americans to CREDITORS in the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES CORPORATE GOVERNMENT. Since gold or any particular form of payment was now illegal, how would Americans pay their debts? Simple, with the credit owed to Americans for the mortgaging of all of their property and the property of future generations.

I'm not all too sure if the US is still in receivership… but just the definition

is interesting. The enactment of a receivership allows a chance to review a failing company's practices. The receiver will work to restructure the company, manage the assets and obligations, and bring the company into a period of recovery. Under the authority of the receiver, certain assets may be liquidated. The goal of receivership is to protect threatened property and assets during legal proceedings and to return the company to a profitable state, thereby avoiding bankruptcy.

Relevance of Erie Railroad v Tompkins.

There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a State whether they be local in their nature or "general," whether they be commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon the federal courts. Except in matters governed by the Federal Constitution or by Acts of Congress, the law to be applied in any case is the law of the State. And whether the law of the State shall be declared by its legislature in a statute or by its highest court in a decision is not a matter of federal concern. P. 304 U. S. 78.

this is a carbon copy of the move pulled in the Cestui Que Vie act of 1666

referenced by R later in his post i will touch on that more when i get to part 5.

>>2238485

I went into it in depth… followed the rabbit hold pretty far and have some real conclusions on the matter… i did some crazy stuff… most got reversed.. but i had succcess. also as for finding a back door, incorrect it only works with your personal credentials…. it HAS to be your name and SSN#…like a debit or credit card… if character or # item is off it rejects the transaction.. i have proven this. i have also followed the cusip #s attached to us all. we are all heavily invested in the stock market…. mining, precious metals, nuclear power, etc.. we are traded on fidelity "my hardest claim because they have changed their website since i discovered this" My wife and i checked the back of SScard with fidelity and some bonds came up…. strange stuff, all worth 30 billion or more. the real weird part was one bond was issued 01/01/0001 and matured when i turned a year and a half "to make sure i'm profitable" for $0. that same day a new bond issued for 30 billion and so on it went , buy… mature… cashout. and im sure that the profits went straight to my account at the fed reserve for my strawman. PS since we are not the beneficiary of the account we have no claim to it. THINK WAR.. we die they collect.

I Dig for my Children… No one should ever be a slave..willing or unknowing. If i would have known this before hand, i wouldn't have had kids. Not the way it panned out so now i am behind anything that will set us free "All of US" (Even the Libtards and Shills). Love thy Haters as Ye Love thy Self!

WWG1WGA

>>2238846

This is a first.

Hey R…… Are we getting warm yet???

>>2238868

I'm cool with it, still plugging away on my next section of the post.

>>2238877

yeah just wanted to see if he was gonna try and wear the mask lol

Part3 of my R legal post breakdown.

>Constitution

>Common Law

>Equity Law

>Admiralty Law

>AND / OR

>Statutory Jurisdiction?

>Statutory Jurisdiction Definition in Blacks Law Dictionary?

>Why Not?

Constitution - a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed.

synonyms: charter, social code, law

Word for thought "acknowledged"

Common Law - the part of English law that is derived from custom and judicial precedent rather than statutes. Often contrasted with statutory law.

the body of English law as adopted and modified separately by the different states of the US and by the federal government.

AKA the Law of the Land… or Natural Law (God's Law)

Equity Law - a venerable group of rights and procedures to provide fairness, unhampered by the narrow strictures of the old common law or other technical requirements of the law. In essence courts do the fair thing by court orders such as correction of property lines, taking possession of assets, imposing a lien, dividing assets, or injunctive relief (ordering a person to do something) to prevent irreparable damage. The rules of equity arose in England where the strict limitations of common law would not solve all problems, so the King set up courts of chancery (equity) to provide remedies through the royal power. Most eastern states had courts of equity or chancery separate from courts of law, and others had parallel systems of law and equity with different procedural rules. Now most states combine law and equity and treat both under "one cause of action."

Deals with the disputes that common law doesn't address

Admiralty Law - Admiralty law or maritime law is a body of law that governs nautical issues and private maritime disputes. Admiralty law consists of both domestic law on maritime activities, and private international law governing the relationships between private parties operating or using ocean-going ships. While each legal jurisdiction usually has its own legislation governing maritime matters, the international nature of the topic and the need for uniformity has, since 1900, led to considerable international maritime law developments, including numerous multilateral treaties.[1]

Matters dealt by admiralty law include marine commerce, marine navigation, salvage, maritime pollution, seafarers’ rights, and the carriage by sea of both passengers and goods. Admiralty law also covers land-based commercial activities that are maritime in character, such as marine insurance. Some lawyers prefer to reserve the term “admiralty law” for “wet law” (e.g. salvage, collisions, ship arrest, towage, liens, & limitation), and use “maritime law” only for “dry law” (e.g. carriage of goods & people, marine insurance, and the MLC).[2]

Admiralty law may be distinguished from the Law of the Sea, which is a body of public international law dealing with navigational rights, mineral rights, jurisdiction over coastal waters, and the maritime relationships between nations. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea has been adopted by 167 countries[3] and the European Union, and disputes are resolved at the ITLOS tribunal in Hamburg.

Ever been to a court room? Ever notice their flag is differnt… yellow tassels?

yup thats what we are subjected to Admiralty/Maritime law.

And NO Statutory Juridiction isn't a 'thing'… no concrete definition anywhere.

Only ones recognized are:

4 types of Jurisdiction

Exclusive jurisdiction - Only federal courts have authority to hear , state courts cannot.

Concurrent Jurisdiction - Federal or state courts could hear.

Original Jurisdiction - Court is the first one to hear case.

Appelate Jurisdiction - Court can only hear a case on appeal.

Part 4 of my R legal post breakdown.

<YOUR NAME

<Birth Certificate = ALL CAPs

<Social Security Card = ALL CAPs

<Drivers License = ALL CAPs

<Are YOU a Living Soul or a Person>CORPORATION?

<Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition

A "person(s)" name in all CAPS denotes a legal fiction..

Like WALMART or UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

The significance of this is that an ENTITY is a PERSON, you dont need

to be alive to be a person, just have to have the ability to operate in COMMERCE or the ability to sue or be sued.

Legal person refers to a non-human entity that is treated as a person for limited legal purposes–corporations, for example. Legal persons can sue and be sued, own property, and enter into contracts. In most countries, legal persons cannot vote, marry, or hold public office.

All examples of your ALL CAPS self are designed to show your registration within

the system, and that you are obligated to follow the RULES.

Look at what you have with this on it. You must pay for everything linked to that

name. Driving, Paying bills, Contracts, Gov. benefits, Court Docs. etc…

It's the only way they can force the real you to comply with the system.

To them we are not a living soul… or even human for that matter

human being - If you go to the current black’s law’s dictionary, you will not find the definition of human being. You can use old legal dictionary and find out that the definition is a “monster.” There are legal books that said the legal system is adapting the new definition of “human being” so the “monster” definition won’t be accepted. The way you going to find the legal definition of “human being” is the US Code. The US Code defines it as an infant for anything but a legal entity. 1 USC Section 1 is defined CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE defines any legal entity other than human being. In 1 USC Section 8, it defines a human being as an infant.

Definition of “HUMAN BEING” that recognizes all lower or inferior people to be “animals” and “property” and signifies all such inferior people with an ALL-UPPER-CASE name.

Person - Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 791, defines 'person' as follows: "In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers."

People - The word “people” may have various significations according to the connection in which it is used. When we speak of the rights of the people, or of the government of the people by law, or of the people as a non-political aggregate, we mean all the inhabitants of the state or nation, without distinction as to sex, age, or otherwise. But when reference is made to the people as the repository of sovereignty, or as the source of governmental power, or to popular government. we are in fact speaking of that selected and limited class of citizens to whom the constitution accords the elective franchise and the right of participation in the offices of government.

Citizen - In general, A member of a free city or jural society, (civitas.) possessing all the rights and privileges which can be enjoyed by any "person" under its constitution and government, and subject to the corresponding "duties".

Monster - A prodigious birth; a human birth or offspring not having the shape of mankind, which cannot be heir to any land, albeit it be brought forth in marriage. Bract fol. 5; Co. Litt. 7, 8; 2 Bl. Comm. 246. ~Black's Law Dict. 2nd edition.

part 5 of th R legal post breakdown

<Birth Certificate Applications Started WHEN?

<Social Security Registration Started WHEN?

<Birth Certificate # = CUSIP

<SS# = CUSIP

<Cestui Que Vie Trust

<Cannon Law

<Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Edition

<Are YOU the Trustee or the Beneficiary?

<Who Created The Debt? The Bond?

<The CREDITORS?

-Birth Certificates-

In 1632, Virginia’s General Assembly passed a law that required all ministers to keep track of christenings, marriages and burials, but the practice died almost immediately because it was so foreign to church officials. Massachusetts passed a 1639 law requiring towns to do the same thing, but records remained patchy and inaccurate.

Part of the reason was the messy process of childbirth itself: Women birthed children at home or in friends’ houses, and many did not survive infancy or childhood. If a child did not live to be baptized, was enslaved or moved from place to place, its birth might not be recorded at all—or its memory might live on only in a family Bible or its mother’s memory.

It took a world war to finally give birth certificates the push they needed to become universal. During World War II, defense-related plants began to hire in unprecedented numbers—but by law, they could only hire American citizens. This created a crisis for the estimated 43 million native-born Americans—nearly one third of the country—who couldn’t prove when—and where—they were born. At the time, the article estimated, 200,000 people were born every year without getting a birth certificate.

-Social Security-

On January 17, 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt sent a message to Congress asking for "social security" legislation. The same day, Senator Robert Wagner of New York and Representative David Lewis of Maryland introduced bills reflecting the administration’s views. The resulting Senate and House bills encountered opposition from those who considered it a governmental invasion of the private sphere and from those who sought exemption from payroll taxes for employers who adopted government-approved pension plans. Eventually the bill passed both houses, and on August 15, 1935, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law.

Birth Certificate # = CUSIP

SS# = CUSIP

Truth both BC and SS are Registered with CUSIP#'s upon issue.

CUSIP is an acronym that refers to Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures and the nine-digit, alphanumeric CUSIP numbers that are used to identify securities, including municipal bonds. A CUSIP number, similar to a serial number, is assigned to each maturity of a municipal security issue.

Cestui Que Vie act of 1666

London 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666.

The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea). Legally, we are considered to be a fiction, a concept or idea expressed as a name, a symbol. That legal person has no consciousness; it is a juristic person, ENS LEGIS, a name/word written on a piece of paper. This traces back to 1666, London is an IndependentCityState, just like Vatican is an IndependentCityState, just like WashingtonDC is an Independent City State.

When London burned, the subrogation of men’s and women’s rights occurred. The responsible act passed… CQV act 1666 meant all men and women of UK were declared dead and lost beyond the seas. The state took everybody and everybody’s property into trust. The state takes control until a living man or woman comes back and claims their titles by proving they are alive and claims for damages can be made.

This is why you always need representation when involved in legal matters, because you’re dead.

Cestui Que Vie Trust

A Cestui Que VieTrust, also known later as a “Fide Commissary Trust” and later again as a “Foreign Situs trust” and also known as a form of “Secret Trust”is a fictional concept being a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of one or more Persons presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a Trust may be formed were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages and private companies.

The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust as pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void. A Cestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted “life” expectancy of the estate.

A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust. When a Beneficiary loses directbenefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in Cestui Que (Vie) Trust on their behalf, they do not “own” the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust and are only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust choose to provide them.

The Trust Corpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as the Estate from two Latin words e+statuo literallymeaning “by virtue of decree, statute or judgment”. However, as the Estate is held in a Temporary not permanentTrust, the (Corporate) Person as Beneficiary is entitled only to equitable title and the use of the Property, rather than legal title and therefore ownership of the Property. Only the Corporation, also known as Body Corporate, Estate andTrust Corpus of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust possesses valid legal personality.

The Property of any Estate created through a Temporary (Testamentary) Trust may be regarded as under “Cestui Que Use” by the Corporate Person, even if another name or description is used to define the type of trust or use. Therefore “Cestui Que Use is not a Person but a Right and therefore a form of “property“.

In 1534, prior to the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VIII declared the first Cestui Que Vie type estate with the Act of Supremecy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later, James I of England modified the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowns). By the 18th Century, the Crown was viewed as a company. However by the start of the 19th Century around 1814 onwards upon the bankruptcy of the company (1814/15) , it became the fully private Crown Corporation controlled by European private banker families.

Canon Law - A body of ecclesiastical jurisprudence which, in countries where the Roman Catholic church is established, is composed of maxims and rules drawn from patristic sources, ordinances and decrees of general councils, and the decretals and bulls of the popes. In England, according to Blackstone, there is a kind of national canon law, composed of legatine and provincial constitutions enacted in England prior to the reformation, and adapted to the exigencies of the English church and kingdom. 1 Bl. Comm. S2. The canon law consists partly of certain rules taken out of the Scripture, partly of the writings of the ancient fathers of the church, partly of the ordinances of general and provincial councils, and partly of the decrees of the pope* in former ages; and it is contained in two principal parts.

-We are only the Trustee-

When assets are placed into a trust, the property is no longer owned by an individual or organization. The trust, a legal entity, is the owner, but the trust is managed for those who will benefit from it, the beneficiaries. Trusts are generally set up as part of the estate planning process, with the proceeds going to beneficiaries when the trust owner dies. Parents may set up a trust to care for a child with a severe physical disability. The trust involves both a beneficiary and one or more trustees.

Who created the bonds/debt is a little muddy on my dig so im gonna skip that at

the moment please forgive.

as for the the creditors it has several contexts… one is in breakdown part2

the other i got this… A revocable living trust, on the other hand, does not protect your assets from your creditors. … Due to these terms, the trust creator maintains ownership of his assets. Therefore, a creditor could force the owner of a revocable living trust to terminate the trust and surrender the assets.

part6 of the R legal post breakdown.

<Uniform Commercial Code

<UCC = Private International Law?

<If UCC Private WHO OWNS?

<1938 Supreme Court - Erie Railroad v Tompkins

What is the UCC?

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a standardized set of business laws that regulate financial contracts. The Uniform Commercial Code UCC has been fully adopted by most states in the U.S. The code itself has nine separate articles. Each article deals with separate aspects of banking and loans. The UCC better enabled lenders to loan money secured by the borrower's personal property.

The policies instituted under the UCC are largely focused on the activities of small businesses and entrepreneurs. Part of the intent is to clear up confusion over how each state might separately regulate such operations. The code imposes standards for processing checks and other types of commercial paper. Often the Uniform Commercial Code is applied to property secured by a bank where the title is held until the borrower pays off the balance of the financing.

Companies that conduct business transactions outside of their home state must comply with the UCC. This includes leasing equipment, selling goods, borrowing money, and establishing contracts. The code also covers warehouse receipts, bulk sales, bills of lading, and investment securities.

The UCC was not established through Congress. It was created by "private organizations" that include the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute. Article 1 of the code establishes definitions and certain parameters for how the UCC is to be applied.

UCC Private International Law

Article l(1)(b) of the Sales Convention relies on the rules of private

international law of the potential forum in an attempt to extend its scope

of application. The United States (along with several other countries)

ratified the Convention subject to a reservation to Article l(l)(b), adopting

the position that the Sales Convention applies only if both contracting

parties have their places of business in countries that ratified the

Convention. The unsettled and unpredictable status of private international

law prompted this limitation. Private international law rules of a

non-signatory nation cannot lead to application of the Sales Convention

when a United States citizen is a party to a transnational contract with a

citizen from a non-signatory nation.3 Under United States law, therefore,

either the Uniform Commercial Code ("U.C.C."), or the relevant

foreign commercial law apply in a sales context, unless both contracting

parties are from Convention states.

Who owns the private UCC?

Answers are unclear as to who owns it but this is the info on who created it.

The UCC originally was created by two national nongovernmental legal organizations: the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute (ALI).

See Part2 for the info collected on Erie Railroad v Tompkins, has already been

covered.

hey R i've spent lots of time working on the legal stuff and picked up a lot of info, GOOD info. But how can we use this to OUR advantage? i have been trying how to compile it into a power play…

any help is appreciated.