>>2223554

>>2224522

>>2226430

I like PrayingMedic for his up-front, down-to-earth approach. But in this case –

well, he might not even KNOW about our discussion thread here, but just look at

hashtags and be acting out of concern for "protecting Status Quo."

Look at his thread from 05/03 – https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/992055701135544323

→ Going by the Keirsey personality charting system, PrayingMedic considers himself

a "Guardian", while he assumes that most Q followers are "Idealists."

>7) The idealist tends to find fulfillment in searching for wisdom, harmony, peace, love,

>truth and justice. They tend to be emotionally driven and they tend to trust their instincts.

>…

>13) Guardians value something else. Guardians value laws, protocols, traditions,

>societal norms & institutions. We especially value government. We know its

>intended purpose is to keep us safe and sane.

>14) Guardians need to know that society isn't on the verge of collapse.

>We see it as our personal responsibility to maintain order …

I studied Keirsey years ago, and I know that in this system I'm definitely an Idealist.

And I think it's also easy to spot the Guardians around this board. :)

And while I like PrayingMedic a lot (and am also convinced that all the personality

types are needed for society to work), I think in this case he was just way more

concerned with someone "not toeing the line" than finding truth…

>>2229277

Yes, that's what I thought from the start,

that a lot of people in this group looked related.

>>2230431

>>2230384

Don't worry, not too many accusations flying around here. :)

And I do understand what you are talking about.

It's quite an complexe issue, involving

→ the attempt to accurately understand Scripture (not just guessing) and

→ trying to change the future before it has happened.

In a very real sense, this is exactly what the cabal's been trying to do,

attempting to control and depopulate the nations so that the

deplorables will never become a threat to their well-being, wealth, and power.

And because they are a truly godless breed, they want to play gods themselves.

They don't trust in a Good Heavenly Father

and so they act from their orphan spirits,

thus actually destroying what they've been trying to protect.

So, same with us? Are we saying that because DJT might be the one

initiating the 7 years of peace, and JFK JR. the one raising from death –

and because we don't want that part of Scripture to happen

(even though we might still be mis-interpreting),

now WE try to act pre-emptively?

Or would we have enough faith in a GOOD God that things will

work out okay if we TRUST Him?

That's what the word "faith" actually means, "to trust."

In the end it's all about trusting a GOOD Heavenly Father and

learning to depend on Him – or trusting ourselves.

I'm just reading some books by Wm. Paul Young,

and they are really helpful in dealing with these very personal questions

of our relationship with God.

And I know they might be to controversial for some. :)

So, another book that I'm reading right now (very slowly) is

"HaShamayim 1A: Angels, Heavenly Structures and the Sons of God" –

which is basically saying the same as Wm. Paul Young,

just in a totally different way.

But, boy, do I wish I had known these truths already years ago!

So, agreeing with you – discernment is a must. But most of all,

we must discern ourselves and we just CAN'T do that on our own.

A functional relationship with God is key.

>>2232574

> I do not understand what we are supposed to be decoding though to get this horrible information.

Don't worry. Sounds like the crazy "decodes" of SerialBrain2. People on reddit didn't get it either…

>>2232885

ThanQ for the refreshing perspective and recap!

>>2234802

Okay, I have a really serious question for you.

I would almost guess you've been posting as lawfag before, right?

Anyhow, I would gage you as a very thoughtful person.

So, regardless of the R question, when I go to the Catalog,

or the Index for that matter, because the Catalog is a complete mess now,

I keep having the impression that the QResearch Board is being let go

on purpose.

I mean, just a few weeks ago, there was this major upgrade so that

this board would be able to handle anything being thrown at it,

AND NOW WE HAVE ALL THIS MESS???!

And look at all the new threads being created each day AND STAYING!!!

It's not the six(!) R post threads that are causing slides;

it's the other stuff jamming this board, and who knows what BUGS messing

with the Catalog.

But not only that – even the QMap PDF has not been edited since 06/26/18,

even though the last Q drop was on 07/04/18.

This is what really makes me think that this board might being let go down on

purpose – and that it is NOT the fault of this thread here.

Sorry, I never got into the ETS stuff, nor FE or whatever. So I cannot say

whether or not there are any similarities. But I also consider it strange

what's happening to this board right now. And I cannot imagine that it

could not be fixed if those in charge actually wanted to.

So, what do you think about that? I won't be around for a couple

hours, but I would appreciate if you'd move this question to the back burner

for a little bit in order to ponder the pros and cons, and then let me know

when it's done. Thanks!

>>2234847

Just a P.S. to my impression that the QResearch Board is being let go

on purpose:

Found this in the Notables of the Main Board the other day -->

>>2231741 Q’s goal is to create a crowd-sourced parallel construction for the general public to see and understand.

>>2238894

>>2238912

>>2238922

Yeah, right, photoshopped – the (You) anyway.

Because BO showed us the IP hashes involved.

The anon saying he did it had different IP hash.

The IP hash of the R post was used only ONCE.

So, who is the larper? Right, the photoshop anon trying to discredit.

>>2238967

Well said, anon! :)

>>2220000

>>2223000

>>2224444

>>2227777

>>2240777

>>2242678

And before anons start crying for the IP hashes –

our baker already has them →

>>2242032

>>2242736

Yes, right, and all of them fake.

If you're not a shill yourself, just have a look at the

screenshots by our baker – >>2242032

>>2242777

Now look at the nice digits you got yourself. :)

Now tell the others who still believe the fake stuff.

Signing out.