Did you read Q's post >>175503 ?
Did you read the docs Q linked to in posts #62, #63 and #64?
Did you read the excerpt from the "Military Commission Act of 2006"?
Did you read the EO posted last night?
Do you comprehend the designation of "Unlawful Enemy Combatant"?
None of those are "wild theories" and they make it very clear that nothing stops TGE from classifying the swamp creatures as "Unlawful Enemy Combatants", detaining them as such and subjecting them to trial and punishment by a military tribunal.
Think Logically.
How do you defuse a bomb?
First, you isolate it in a special place where the wires/strings are completely cut. Safety and Security.
And what if a quick visit to Gitmo causes swamp creatures to sing like a bird and then plead guilty to pedophilia, child rape, murder, fraud, corruption or whatever in a civilian court rather than facing trial before a military tribunal at Gitmo?
Ever hear of a plea bargain? Get them to sign the docs, slap a tracking monitor on them and send them home. Catch and Release, get it?
Remember that part about 40/60? A guilty plea means the dirty laundry doesn't get aired in public because the public can't handle it.
What is the political fallout from a guilty plea? Little or nothing because they admitted guilt.
Wonder why TGE mentioned getting lots more judges on the bench last night?
I'm guessing the real heavyweights will get tribunals. The rest? IDK, I'm not writing the script.