Anonymous ID: b011b8 July 20, 2018, 10:30 p.m. No.2228439   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9166 >>7487 >>7761

>>2227822

I respect your beliefs but you don't seem to feel that way about certain other Christians:

 

"So will Q revelations show how the Catholics have undermined Jesus' message and they way He desired we live? I think so."

 

Not very Christian attitude. Seems to be linking Catholics to the Cabal?

 

In 2012, there were 1,228,612,000 Catholics in the world and 393,053 priests. The growth of the Catholic population has been uneven, with a small growth in Europe (just 6 percent) and huge growth in Africa (238 percent). But CARA concludes that the “differences between these two regions are largely attributable to differences in fertility rates over time.

 

Are those billion+ people really your enemy?

 

Somewhere far, far back in your own genealogy, your ancestors, if the were Christians, would almost certainly would have been Catholics. Maybe polytheistic pagans before that?

 

Protestant Reformation began in 1517 and was led by Martin Luther, John Calvin and others, and brought about Lutherans and Calvinists. Shortly thereafter, Presbyterians formed after the Scottish Reformation in 1536. Evangelicalism, later in early 1700s.

 

I know some people are very passionate about their religions, but you might be a little more careful in you rhetoric. You referred to Catholics, not the Pope, nor Jesuits, nor Dominicans - Catholics. That would seem to suggest they were complicit if not guilty. You always had a choice to NOT be a Catholic, which you did.

 

You said: "the Catholics have undermined Jesus' message and they way He desired we live?"

 

So,,,,,you are right and they are wrong and Q is going to expose them for their wrong thinking.

 

I think that is a fair paraphrasing of your statement?

 

No one is forcing those Catholics to believe their particular set of beliefs, but you seem to angry they don't AGREE WITH YOU and warrant some "revelations" (i.e. exposure)

 

You may want to think about that for a while.

 

It maybe the simple mindedness that espouses All ("insert your favorite enemy here") are bad and need to be punished/expunged/beheld accountable).

 

Are ALL Masons, Shriners (St Jude Children's Hospital ) Catholics, Jews, Arabs, politicians, judges, corporations, rich people on your list for retribution.

 

Or does ever group have varying degree or corruption that stains the rest?

 

For example, the Televangelist preachers that have be publicly outed as frauds, liars, cheats, adulterers con artists etc.

 

Would it be fair to include you in our scorn for them?

 

I think you would strongly object, yet you are prepared to do exactly that for most of those I listed above.

 

If your gross generalizations are fair and accurate, you have a bigger problem.

 

There are too many of them, and if you make them you mortal enemy, you will never find peace.

 

PS - I don't think you are malevolent, but maybe a little reckless, and could easily be misunderstood

Anonymous ID: b011b8 July 21, 2018, 1:59 a.m. No.2229344   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3321 >>3330 >>3665

>>2229169

I was raised a Catholic too but decided I didn't need the preisthood anymore. In the year I went to Catechism and otherwise I never saw any signs of Mithraism which existed in Rome. I die out in `400 AD but I see nothing in Catholic doctrine that indicates that.

 

People have talked about the Jesuits, so maybe that is were it is hiding. However, I have had lots of contact with Jesuit schooled and a few Jesuits and lay people. Never saw indications of any pagan stuff there un less the share some symbolism (which I disregard and dont pray to statues anyway.

 

With respect to Q, I have all of his posts from several sites (e.g. qanon.pub) and I don't see any mention of 1871, the corporation and other thing you mentioned. I have seen those things elsewhere but not from the real Q.

 

Are you sure you didn't get that from someone telling you that Q said it. Lots of those false prophets sneaking in their personal agenda.

 

I have never seen any real evidence along those lines and know a number of constitutional lawyer that would have uncovered it. I took a few law courses myself, so I put no faith in that conspiracy,

 

That said, the FED is a scam that need s to end. It may have been done with good intentions but went way off the rails.

 

My personal theory is that there may be a plan to initiate a Government owned bank under the Treasury debt, backed potentially by gold. We walk away from the Fed, keep paying interest- only on the debt (as we do now). recal all the currency in a swap/trade for new $$. All the power moveds to the Treasury which we can structure to be accountable/transparent to the public (by Constitutional mandate ideally). That leaves the Fed flapping in the breeze with the only role to be clearing house for tranactions between their members banks. International transactions thru Treasury. Freeze the FED out and effectively wipe out the debt. Price of bonds would crash and we pay bonds of with pennies.

 

If that is close to viable, I suspect Trump may have given a heads up to our international "friends" wo are yet to be determined in full but possible Saudi, Russian, China, others I wont try to list. Look at the list of who the largest holders are.

 

Now the desert! European bank might take a beating and potentially wipe out Roths and their Cabal. Being debt free, we and our new "global partners" have the $$ leverage to wipe them out and rescue and casualties with loans from the US/Saudi/Russia??? bank with natural gas and oil as the security. Collectively we would have an effective world near-monopoly on energy

 

Cant figure all the details but think there is a possibility that is in the long -tern of the Plan, maybe 2nd term since that will be huge and require total Congressional support.

 

Imagine if that could be the finale of the Plan.

 

Glorious is too small a word!!!

 

Anyways - I'm burned out. Best wishes and let me know if I did miss that stuff in the Q posts.

I am gonna look again but may just not have them

Anonymous ID: b011b8 Aug. 4, 2018, 7:49 p.m. No.2458055   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2457487

Except you can leave anytime and join any group or no group.

 

The Catholic Church"offers" their guidance which you can accept or reject if you don't accept their "rules"

 

You are completele free to "grown your own if you want, but you don have the right to insist tham change their rules to accommodate.

 

They only control you as long as you submit to them.

 

You can always "set yourself free"

 

#Walkaway