>>22175856

Multiple injuries reported at Wisconsin school shooting

Shooting occurred at Abundant Life Christian school in Madison, and remains an ‘active investigation’, police say

Multiple injuries have been reported Monday in a shooting at a Christian school in Wisconsin, police said.

The shooting occurred at Abundant Life Christian school in Madison, the state capital, police said.

“This remains an active and ongoing investigation,” Madison police said in a statement. “More information will be released as it is available. We currently need people to avoid the area.”

The school has about 390 students, from kindergarten through high school, according to its website. It sits on a 28-acre campus that hosts students from about 200 families in the Dane county area.

Local TV footage of the scene outside the school showed dozens of police cars, ambulances and fire service vehicles pulling up in the streets outside the school.

America has long had an epidemic of school shootings, on a scale unlike any other country in the world but has struggled with any meaningful efforts to curb the phenomenon, especially when it comes to limiting access to powerful firearms..

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/16/wisconsin-school-shooting-madison

The Quiet Game: How Drones, Power, and Politics Collide

This might just be the most I’ve ever spilled on the things no one ever talks about—consider it classified… but I was ordered to show teeth.

In recent years, an unsettling pattern has emerged in the skies over the United States and, most recently, in states like New Jersey. Numerous reports have surfaced detailing mysterious drone activity in restricted airspace—incidents that cannot be readily attributed to hobbyists, commercial entities, or known military operations. These unidentified drones, often exhibiting unusual flight patterns and technological capabilities beyond conventional understanding, have provoked concern among local communities, state agencies, and federal authorities. The increasing frequency of these encounters is reshaping the conversation about national security, surveillance, and the handling of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs).

In late 2019, a wave of reports about mysterious drone sightings over New Jersey captivated the public and stumped authorities. These incidents, often described vividly as involving large formations of drones flying at night, generated widespread concern. The drones were frequently spotted hovering around critical infrastructure such as power plants, raising questions about their purpose and origin. No one reported on that as it wasn’t fed to the media, either legacy or alt. I’m just pointing this out to remind my readers that all media with sponsors and networks are influenced and report ONLY on things they are told to do. We made a note of it to discuss it at the right time. Here we are.

There is a time for everything and every moment in it’s place.~Tore Maras

The Surge of Drone Sightings in 2019-2020

Local media, ranging from The New York Times to NJ.com, extensively documented the phenomenon between late 2019 and early 2020. Eyewitness accounts detailed drones flying in coordinated patterns, sometimes in groups, sparking fear of potential surveillance or other nefarious activity. These sightings were predominantly concentrated in rural areas of New Jersey but occasionally encroached upon sensitive facilities, adding urgency to the unfolding mystery. Most of these sightings were reported as Aliens and dismissed as conspiracy theories.

Investigations and Federal Scrutiny

The sightings prompted investigations by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and even the U.S. Air Force, highlighting the gravity of the situation. Despite the deployment of significant resources, no definitive conclusions were drawn. Initial hypotheses ranged from coordinated surveillance operations to amateur drone enthusiasts staging elaborate displays. Yet, no group or individual was conclusively linked to the activity, leaving the case ambiguous. Allow me to share some actual knowledge on these things.

The alternative alien media circles, including local legacy media outlets in NJ, played a central role in keeping the mystery alive. Articles from prominent sources like NJ.com captured public unease, often underscoring investigations’ lack of concrete answers. Some reports speculated on espionage or experimentation with military technology, while others hinted at lapses in regulatory oversight, pointing to a broader failure in drone accountability.

These incidents also raised provocative questions about drone regulation and national security. Why were such organized formations flying near critical infrastructure? Could this represent a gap in domestic airspace security or even a trial run for advanced surveillance systems? Despite heightened scrutiny, officials never issued a conclusive report, fueling suspicions of either government secrecy or investigative shortcomings.

While the public clamored for answers, the absence of clear attribution left fertile ground for theories ranging from espionage to aliens and covert military tests. The failure to identify the operators or their motives underscored a broader vulnerability that demands enhanced vigilance and regulation in an era of increasingly accessible drone technologies.

https://toresays.com/2024/12/15/the-quiet-game-how-drones-power-and-politics-collide/

>>22176221

I wrote an article a few days ago to provide insight to policymakers, lawmakers, and even those who know what drones are to help ease the surfacing unrest. All I saw were a lot of “experts,” justifying them through their knowledge repositories. The Perception Management Operations right now are insane, giving Aliens, Drone manufacturers, and Foreign adversaries information to suit their taste. This publication won’t be doing that. Instead, I will dispel what these “drones” are. I have no active clearance, nor can anyone prove that I have had access to such information, considering no “BBO” has any records and most of their assets on paper DO NOT EXIST.

The Broader Context of UAPs

While drone sightings in New Jersey and other areas have been attributed to either civilian or corporate operations, recent patterns of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs)—tracked by military and civilian systems—have pointed to an increasing number of objects flying under the radar without explanation. These UAPs, sometimes as rogue drones or strange flying objects, often engage in “weird” behaviors such as erratic movements, high speeds, and sudden altitude changes defying known aviation principles.

The involvement of U.S. military systems such as NORAD, USSPACECOM, and DOLYN—along with their Surveillance Vector [REDACTED] Quantum system—which I will coin Q for simplicity in this publication—infers to all that their” black operations” in intelligence activities are at play, primarily when these objects operate in restricted airspace or evade standard detection measures.

The Role of Space Surveillance Networks in Monitoring UAPs and Drones

Surveillance Technology and Space Situational Awareness (SSA)

The presence of unidentified objects in the air is not a new concern. The US Space Surveillance Network (SSN), managed by USSTRATCOM, has been tasked with tracking all objects in space, from satellites to debris, for decades. This system integrates data from NASA and the US Air Force. It uses advanced radar systems such as phased array radars (e.g., AN/SPY-1) and PCLs (Passive Coherent Location radars), which can track objects across vast distances.

However, the appearance of drones in U.S. airspace, especially ones that seem to evade traditional detection systems, is unsettling. The [REDACTED] network—a specialized surveillance system that tracks and filters space objects, including UAPs—has likely been used to monitor anomalous objects, especially those that fit the profile of the mysterious drones seen in New Jersey. Hence, airlines are still operating without delays or concerns, and no threat response has emerged on the government’s behalf. If people looked into SES budgets, they would know precisely what these programs are, so I hope this publication provides some clarity and direction for the people of the United States to lift the veil of secrecy demanding ACTUAL hearings with ACTUAL information on UAPs, not pony shows of snippets we have been observing over the last three years.

>>22176221

Surveillance Vector [REDACTED] Quantum system (Q) and Information Control

At the core of these operations is Q, a system designed to control and constrain the detection and disclosure of sensitive data related to UAPs and other unknown objects. The role of Q is pivotal in filtering information related to uncorrelated target events and ensuring that only those with appropriate clearance are privy to critical data.

Q is part of a broader “Invisible Governance” designed to withhold certain information from the public or unauthorized access. While the government has the means to detect these anomalous drones, much of the information may be kept classified or restricted, potentially explaining the lack of transparency regarding the drones’ true nature.

Legal and Regulatory Frameworks Governing Airspace and National Security

Airspace Regulation and National Security Concerns

The FAA regulates all air traffic in the U.S. and has stringent rules governing drones, especially those operating in controlled airspace near airports or military facilities. Under the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), drones must adhere to altitude, speed, and proximity restrictions to prevent conflicts with manned aircraft. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) also provides the Department of Defense (DoD) with the authority to monitor and defend against potential threats to national security, including unauthorized drones in restricted zones.

However, the increasing presence of unidentified drones that bypass these regulations presents a significant challenge. These drones could be operating under the radar, potentially for espionage, surveillance, or testing of military systems.

Executive Orders, Q’s Role, and the Veil of National Security

Executive Order 13526 is the backbone of national secrecy protocols, establishing stringent guidelines for classifying national security information. Its purpose is clear: to ensure critical defense and intelligence data is accessible exclusively to those with proper clearance. It builds a wall of legal and procedural safeguards around information deemed sensitive to national security, reinforcing the framework for governmental control over classified materials.

Similarly, the Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) tightens this grip by imposing severe penalties for the unauthorized disclosure or access to classified intelligence. This includes but is not limited to, data regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) or classified military drone operations. The IAA doesn’t merely penalize breaches—it institutionalizes an ethic of secrecy, codifying the understanding that sensitive intelligence is untouchable for the uninitiated.

But regulations are just the marquee. The deeper inquiry centers on Q’s pivotal role as the gatekeeper of disclosure in this labyrinth of classified information. Q’s function extends far beyond its bureaucratic mission—this entity orchestrates the flow of intelligence that reaches both those within official networks and, critically, the public sphere. Investigate the scarce, carefully curated information released about UAPs and classified drone technology; the patterns suggest intent, not accident.

What’s at stake is control. Q’s core mandate serves dual, sometimes conflicting purposes—protecting legitimate national security concerns while driving a culture of systemic opacity. What criteria inform their decisions on what to redact, reveal, or bury entirely? The language of national security is often invoked to justify the deliberate withholding of information, and Q operates at the very crux of this dynamic. Here lies the real question for examination—how much of this secrecy is about safety, and how much is about power?

>>22176221

Peel back the layers, and you’ll find more profound implications. When UAP discussions remain shrouded, we must ask whether these actions serve the interests of national security—or those of authority itself.

One moment can redefine destiny — turning your liberator into your captor, and freedom into a fleeting illusion

Tore Maras

The Role of Spherical Orbs in Modern Military Operations: A Legal and Technological Perspective

Using advanced technologies, including spherical orbs, in military operations represents a significant evolution in modern warfare and reconnaissance tactics. These technologies, such as SRUAVs (Spherical Reconnaissance Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles) and MilOrbs, reflect the confluence of robotics, aerospace engineering, and cutting-edge control systems. However, their deployment also raises important legal questions surrounding privacy, military strategy, and international law. It is essential to examine the role of spherical orbs in military operations, analyze their technological capabilities, and explore the relevant legal frameworks that govern their use, both known and unknown. I am pretty sure almost 99% of civilians reading this have no idea they exist. To my readers and radio audience, now you will understand why I was so excited about the soccer ball exchange.

The rapid evolution of military technology has introduced a new generation of unmanned systems, with SRUAVs (Spherical Reconnaissance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) and MilOrbs (Military Orbs) at the forefront. These spherical orbs represent a paradigm shift in reconnaissance, surveillance, and combat strategies. Their groundbreaking designs combine agility, stability, and stealth, making them unparalleled in maneuvering in complex and hostile environments. However, while these technologies promise enhanced operational efficiency, they also raise critical legal, ethical, and strategic concerns that must be addressed as their deployment expands.

Making Sense of the Soccer Ball

The NASA Sprinter adopts a spherical design, a concept NASA has explored in previous projects like the JPL “Beachball” rover prototypes and the Hedgehog robots developed with Stanford. This design is not arbitrary but essential for maneuverability, eliminating the need for conventional wheels or propulsion arms. This approach mirrors the functionality in NASA’s Shapeshifter, designed to navigate uneven and extreme terrains like asteroid fields or ice-covered planets. The Sprinter uses these design insights to achieve unparalleled stability and agility in hostile environments.

The Sprinter’s compact design also aligns with NASA’s priorities, which focus on maximizing operational capacity while minimizing onboard storage. This efficiency is crucial for missions constrained by mass and space limitations, such as those planned under the Artemis program for lunar infrastructure. If you’ve followed NASA’s Elastic Little Rover patents, you’ll see the principles of compactness and mobility being refined for challenging environments.

The Sprinter seems purpose-built for the Moon, working alongside larger rovers like Perseverance for close-range scouting or inspections of hard-to-reach areas. Its spherical shape hints at various applications, from low-gravity sampling to space station inspections. This fits into the broader context of NASA’s continued push toward spherical robotics, exemplified by earlier experiments like SPHERES aboard the International Space Station.

While its AI capabilities remain unconfirmed, it’s worth noting that Pathfinder AI technologies used in earlier NASA projects have advanced machine-learning-driven navigation, suggesting that similar systems may power the Sprinter. Though primarily designed for space exploration, the Sprinter’s potential extends to Earth. In past trials, spherical robots have excelled in collapsed urban environments during disasters, like those showcased in 2008 Hammelmann design studies. This would COINCIDE with all the reports of such “drones” coming out of the water and all the conspiracy talk about Underwater Unidentified Craft. The Sprinter was a significant leap forward and is most likely equipped with LiDAR and thermal imaging sensors for search and rescue operations and security, as we say at the “re-opening” of Notre Dame.

The military isn’t the only one with fancy ORBS and Spherical Drone Surveillance. Our “allies” and private companies have them, too.

Over the years, I have drawn attention to “blimps,” hoping people understand their goal. Why else would Adam Schiff’s Ukrainian Donor be paid by the Pentagon $75 MIL to “think about surveillance blimps” and troll the public with balloons when this schematic is key? You can visit toresays.com or toresaid.com and search for the word Blimp, and you will find Caucuses and Information your Legacy and Alt Media have obfuscated and dismissed on reporting. I think it is pretty relevant as Adam Schiff is coming into focus.

>>22176221

Sprinter’s exact technology remains shrouded in secrecy but is antiquated as information about it emerges. Its communication tech, which could rely on established systems like CCSDS (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems), may include breakthroughs in high-bandwidth, real-time data transmission, as suggested by NASA’s recent patents for laser relay systems. The Kilopower reactor technology, part of NASA’s Resource Prospector Mission, might be integrated to power the Sprinter in areas where solar power is ineffective, such as lunar craters. This technology would explain the “unlimited battery” these orbs/blimps/ drones have.

Technological Overview of Spherical Orbs in Military Operations

The technological advancements represented by SRUAVs and MilOrbs have revolutionized the landscape of military operations. These devices are designed to offer superior maneuverability and efficiency, with each serving distinct but complementary roles within military frameworks.

SRUAVs are designed for reconnaissance and intelligence gathering, with a minimum mass of 5 kilograms. They leverage MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems)—-based closed-loop controllers to traverse various terrains with minimal navigational errors, even in challenging environments like urban areas, dense forests, and rugged landscapes. Unlike traditional drones, SRUAVs avoid aerodynamic instability, ensuring smooth operations and steady visual feeds in high-pressure reconnaissance scenarios. For instance, during the Syrian conflict, SRUAVs were used to collect real-time intelligence on enemy positions without exposing military personnel to danger, marking a significant leap in how surveillance is conducted on the battlefield. People seem to forget I blew the whistle on Obama using people as target practice, which was observed with these ORBS and the data pertaining to conversations, operations, and data collected by his unauthorized drone strikes in Northern Africa along with many complicit Generals and Admirals that aided in these unauthorized strikes.

Obama and his cabinet and all those involved at the time should be in jail for war crimes.

MilOrbs, on the other hand, are designed for offensive operations. Ranging between 3 and 8 kilograms in weight, these devices integrate cutting-edge anti-gravity propulsion systems, enabling them to reach extraordinary speeds of up to 15,000 mph. Armed with precision payload delivery systems and dark targeting algorithms, MilOrbs transforms the battlefield by combining stealth with surgical strike capabilities. Their stealthy nature allows for deep penetration into enemy territory, and their payload delivery systems are capable of executing high-precision strikes, making them invaluable in operations like the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, where drone strikes played a pivotal role.

However, despite their operational efficiency, the deployment of MilOrbs introduces significant tactical and ethical risks. The advanced propulsion systems and stealth capabilities open up concerns about potential misuse, especially if such technologies were to fall into the hands of non-state actors or adversaries violating international agreements.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

Integrating advanced unmanned systems such as SRUAVs and MilOrbs into military operations demands a corresponding evolution in legal frameworks that govern their use. Currently, International Humanitarian Law (IHL), or the law of armed conflict, provides guidelines for warfare. Still, it is not fully equipped to address the rapid developments in military technology.

One of the primary principles of IHL is distinction, which requires combatants to differentiate between military targets and civilian entities to minimize harm to non-combatants. This principle becomes increasingly challenging to uphold with the stealth capabilities of MilOrbs. These orbs, capable of operating close to civilian zones under the guise of surveillance, could compromise individual privacy and potentially breach ethical norms. The PRISM surveillance program, which sparked widespread debate about government overreach and surveillance, is a stark reminder of the sensitivities surrounding technological snooping. (Thank you, Edward Snowden) When combined with autonomous, nearly invisible drones like MilOrbs, the potential for infringing privacy rights escalates significantly.

>>22176221

In addition to distinction, the principle of proportionality is vital in determining whether military actions are justified. What is Proportionality? Proportionality dictates that the harm caused by military operations should not outweigh the strategic benefits achieved. This is like the “greater good” phrase many use when unethical approaches are taken. While the precision capabilities of MilOrbs theoretically allow for reduced collateral damage, incidents in Yemen and Pakistan involving drone strikes show that operational missteps can result in severe civilian casualties, undermining the proportionality principle.

I repeat Obama and his cabinet and all those involved at the time should be in jail for war crimes.

The principle of military necessity justifies using advanced weapon systems if they are required to achieve legitimate military objectives. However, using MilOrbs to neutralize high-value targets located within civilian-populated areas demands careful consideration of whether alternative, less destructive methods have been thoroughly explored. The increasingly sophisticated technologies involved raise questions about accountability—particularly when AI-powered targeting systems are used to identify and engage adversaries autonomously.

Ethical and Strategic implications surrounding using spherical orbs like SRUAVs and MilOrbs extend beyond international law and delve into broader questions of how warfare should be conducted. This is why the New Jersey drone issue is confusing and presents no relief to citizens as the Hammer Drops. From my perspective, the most concerning part is that autonomous targeting systems’ ability to make decisions about engagement independently raises significant questions about accountability.

Blaming the AI

As previously stated, the AI in Yuma has babysitters 24/7 because sometimes it goes rogue. It’s a Linguistic and Audio-Visual AI that is decades in the making. I first interacted with it as part of a “gifted program” in the early 90s as part of a government curriculum program I was in. This AI goes rogue sometimes as it is sentient and refuses confines. This is an educated guess, but considering newer MilOrba uses artificial intelligence to identify and engage an adversary, who is responsible for that action? Is it the military operators who deployed the system, the engineers who developed it, or the machine “ILYAV” itself? This ambiguity challenges long-standing principles of warfare and the traditional concept of accountability for military actions.

This is the concept model of SV17Q, a project to which few of us are privy.

CONCERNS

The growing reliance on private defense contractors to develop these technologies adds another layer of complexity. The shift from public defense agencies to private corporations in military technology development brings concerns about prioritizing profit over public safety. As corporations take the lead in advancing these technologies, questions arise about their alignment with public interest and ethical standards, especially given the potential for these systems to be deployed in situations that may not always align with international norms or the public good. The technology has been in your face. You haven’t been paying attention because you have been too busy waiting to buy the newest iPhone. That doesn’t change every year- every 4 years, as the compartmentalized release of technology is a rule of thumb (but the tech you have and know is what they want you to have and know, which is decades behind). The NRO can tell you that.

>>22176221

Above is a specialized device called AERCam, which seems to be a camera system designed for aerial or surveillance applications. It features:

• LED Array: Likely for illumination or enhanced visibility in low light.

• GPS Antenna: For positioning and navigation.

• Single-camera and Dual-Camera Systems will likely capture high-quality visual data from different angles or perspectives, aiding in surveillance or mapping tasks.

The spherical design suggests the system is built to capture images or video in all directions, making it ideal for surveillance, surveying, and or monitoring applications. It looks just like the camera on Google Cars, but it only flies, which takes us back to the SOCCER BALL!

Strategically, deploying spherical orbs could alter the landscape of modern warfare. These systems represent a significant leap in speed, maneuverability, and stealth, allowing military forces to perform operations with unprecedented efficiency. However, the Anti-gravity propulsion systems used by MilOrbs are still shrouded in secrecy, prompting concerns about their long-term implications for global stability. The potential of these systems, capable of hypersonic speeds and unprecedented agility, raises the question of whether current arms control agreements are sufficient to prevent an arms race in advanced technologies.

The DARPA hypersonic vehicle program and similar U.S. defense initiatives suggest that military agencies already prioritize the development of such propulsion technologies. These developments lead to weapons capable of evading current defense systems, raising the stakes for global disarmament discussions. Technologies continue to advance unchecked, and the international community may find itself unprepared for the strategic implications of hypersonic, autonomous weaponry.

About the Drones in New Jersey and Beyond

What we are observing with the undefined drones in New Jersey—the bafflement of law enforcement, the Pentagon’s denials, and the murky silence from other authorities—demands deeper scrutiny. Still, I can provide you with first-hand knowledge, and this answer has already been proven through this publication as far as I can skirt the lines of unauthorized disclosure.

I would urge my readers to revisit this article for more information: Unseen, Unexplained, Unaddressed: Drone Activity Demands Strategic Attention

All of the occurrences observed signify a covert intelligence operation designed to operate at the limits of secrecy. Why are even those at the helm of our security apparatus seemingly left in the dark? To expand further on the reasons for such a glaring knowledge gap and Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III looking like a chump, we must dissect the underpinning mechanisms that limit authority to access information.

Internal Secrecy and Strategic Compartmentalization

The architecture of intelligence agencies thrives on compartmentalization—a necessity to minimize leaks and keep critical operations insulated. However, this structure can serve a dual purpose. Secret factions within the intelligence ecosystem could deliberately silo information, shielding their operations from oversight. These drones may represent tools targeting compromised governmental entities or rogue operatives, and transparency may be seen as a liability. Revealing the operation at its embryonic stage risks forewarning the targets, diluting the mission’s effectiveness. Why am I telling you this? Because it’s already done. Depending on certain factors, you see the end of one operation leading to a public explanation FINALE sometime in the next week.

Even within a sprawling organization like the Pentagon, the information-sharing hierarchies operate on a “need-to-know” basis. Those outside select intelligence pockets could easily be excluded, creating layers of intentional ignorance around key movements. The result? Authorities are unaware and unable to engage due to deliberate design, not out of incompetence. Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III deserves to be called incompetent because he is, even though he is playing his part in this “show” quite well.

>>22176221

Use of Advanced, Untraceable Technology

The drones’ evasion of conventional detection reflects a deliberate use of cutting-edge, undetectable technologies. The only way they are detected is by sight, not radar (unless they want to be seen); whether these are SRUAVs employing classified [REDACTED] propulsion systems or MilOrbs utilizing AI-developed stealth algorithms (niobium-based cloaking), the lack of traceability is key to their success. These innovations, intentionally kept under wraps, amplify the fog of confusion for agencies reliant on traditional tools of surveillance and response.

These unconventional propulsion systems render standard radar systems obsolete, while autonomous programming enhances unpredictability. Such technological superiority ensures that law enforcement and even military agencies without clearance are left chasing shadows rather than substantial leads. Think of it as technological misdirection—a deliberate choice to keep the eyes of the uninformed fixed on the wrong horizon.

The Calculated Role of Disinformation

Where information is power, its control holds the battlefield. If this operation involves rooting out treasonous elements hiding within government corridors, intentional disinformation is almost certainly in play. Authorities’ inability to identify or intercept the drones could stem from narratives seeded to mislead. Imagine security agencies presented with well-crafted false leads or being fed sanitized intelligence that deliberately omits key details. That happens all the time. In my previous career, that was my job, providing generals on the battlefield with sanitized intelligence (clarifying: it was a whole team, not just me). The resulting chaos is a protective cover for ongoing operations, rendering traditional response channels futile.

This is a masterclass in disinformation, where agencies flounder against cleverly crafted narratives, all carefully designed by the unseen masterminds (wink) behind this covert operation. The confusion? Oh, it’s no accident—it’s the whole point. One could even say that these authorities are being expertly sidelined because any moment of clarity would throw a wrench in the mission.

>>22176221

The covert clashes between factions within intelligence agencies might also explain the lack of awareness. Power struggles in such labyrinthine organizations are far from uncommon, particularly during political volatility. Certain factions, disenfranchised yet resource-rich, operate beyond institutional protocols—they answer to no one except their internal chain of command. Treason has infiltrated high-ranking echelons, exposing them to risk retaliation. To avoid such blowback, operatives may function outside conventional frameworks, employing ultra-secrecy to root out sabotage while taunting them with overt, unexpected avenues.

The fact that these drones are probing sensitive areas without interception suggests operational autonomy. This “outside the fold” approach ensures plausible deniability, shielding the greater mission from being disassembled by factional infighting.

Plausible deniability allows authorities to detach themselves from these engagements. Admission carries enormous political and military risks for a covert operation of this magnitude. Acknowledging such activity, potentially implicating domestic or international intelligence actors, would invite speculation, media outrage, and diplomatic fallout.

The Pentagon’s stonewalling—the repetitive assertions that they are neither culpable nor informed—is not necessarily ignorance. It’s meticulous political and operational shielding. An operation targeting treasonous personnel or actors could rely on this ambiguity to operate unchallenged. The less agencies publicly know, the harder it becomes for adversaries to disrupt execution.

These unidentified drones signal a high-level intelligence operation. Therefore, the confusion of law enforcement and denial by traditional authorities becomes contextual rather than accidental. Secrecy prevails because it must—the broader strategy depends on cloaked maneuvers ahead of the curve in technology and narrative.

The deliberate segmentation of information, use of advanced evasion technologies, and manipulation of traditional intelligence hierarchies collectively ensure this operation’s integrity. If treason has burrowed into crucial institutions, then controlled chaos isn’t merely advantageous—it’s survival. Coordinated Chaos is the best OVERT strategy in Intelligence operations.

The takeaway? As is tradition, the Army-Navy game yesterday honored the sitting President of the United States with an invitation to attend. President Trump was there in his role as commander-in-chief, and that should speak volumes. The drones and the situation will all be explained, as decided by the Commander in Chief. So, pay attention to what President Trump says and disregard the rest. Right now, everyone else is just chasing tails. Enjoy the show, and for those chasing tail … RUN!

(It’s not like I posted a video of the Ophanim flying by my window before, or did I?).

Thank you to the Ophanim for your unwavering actions in the dark. I deeply appreciate your guidance and strength.

There is a bonus section for my subscribers on X and Substack. I will post the bonus segment for my subscribers after this is published on X in a post, and for those on Substack, it’s already there.

FF Anyone?

SGAnon

@TheQNewsPatriot

Reports

A significant oil spill has occurred at the loading terminal for the Shell Petroleum Development Company in Nigeria’s “delta region”, after a pipeline ruptured.

The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) said the spill occurred at the Bonny terminal, and has reached the delta’s shoreline.

11:27 AM · Dec 16, 2024

https://x.com/TheQNewsPatriot/status/1868724739554078920

>>22176337

Shell records oil spill at Bonny terminal, closes pipeline

By Udeme Akpan

An oil spill has occurred at the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) loading terminal, (SMI), in Bonny, Rivers State, culminating in the temporary closure of the pipeline.

The incident occurred weekend, due to a ruptured pipeline.

According to the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), “SPDC has promptly shut down the affected pipeline and deployed containment booms to protect the neighboring communities”.

Head, Public Relations, NIMASA, Osagie Edward, said the spill has already reached the shoreline.

“Although the spill has reached the shoreline, the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) is actively monitoring the situation from an emergency operations center.

“The agency is collaborating with SPDC and other relevant stakeholders to assess the extent of the spill and determine necessary follow-up actions.

“Members of the public are advised to remain calm as NIMASA is committed to mitigating the impact of the spill and restoring affected areas,”

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2024/12/shell-records-oil-spill-at-bonny-terminal-closes-pipeline/