>>2217787

>/comfy/ moving forward without trip.

>Identify by info and style.

ID will be the same (unless you switch IPs).

You might know already since you're savvy enough to properly crosslink threads. …those unnecessary line spaces, though

Definitely identify your legitimacy by your info, though. Any insight into the style or just adopting "Q-style" per the medium?

>>2217960

>autists bottle neck

Au contraire, my newfriend. Clowns and attentionwhores shit up the general while autists strive for categorization, sorting, and orderly and logical workflows.

>>2217990

>Clown chimes in conveniently.

OP >>2217942 use this thread we'll make summaries and graphics here and distribute them into the general notables.

>>2217994

>Third CIAnigger chimes in.

>>2218420

>black list anon, HIGHLY recommend you bring the drops back to the main bread so it can be added to the notables and gain greater autist exposure.

Planefags do their own thing and update in the notables every bread.

>>2218405

>>2218440

aye

Let's keep an eye out in the general for the compiled pastebin of previous posts so we don't have to do it.

I suggest we're /comfy/ enough in here to create a methodology.

>Step 1: agree on a methodology

>Step 2: compile posts into easiest format

>Step 3: extract info from posts

>Step 4: sort info (initials, names, companies, images, links)

>Step 5: expand info: decode initials; dig names and companies

>Step 5: synthesize info: map connections between names and companies; cite sauce, relevance, implications

>Step 6: visualize info: make a map, organizer, or side by side for just 1 data point (person—connection—person) at a time

>Step 7: build the web: link up each micro map so it expands into a comprehensive network

I made a NXIVM thread (now slid off board) when it broke, and I wish it had some order to it. For example

>>2218135

>>2218261

great digs, but at the end of the day it's just an unsorted data dump that complicates more than it clarifies. If it's just 8 UIDs in here, can we adopt something of a template for posts that adhere to a methodology we settle on?

I'll do a sample dig in the morning.

>>>2218454

>>2218961

ugh i really could've organized that better

It's gonna be tough finding all the digs in the general and pulling them here, unfortunately. Maybe enough anons will vigilantly prompt crossposts here.

>decode initials

Someone did that somewhere but I can't find it now.

>Step 6

I'll dump some visual organizer templates in this post and the next. (Deserves two bumps anyway.)

>>2219025

>more visual organizers

>>2219015

>Will be changing IPs.

Trust autists to discern meaningful info from bullshit.

>>2219044 (checked)

I say we work here (hopefully unimpeded) and submit periodic updates in the form of simple, shareable visuals to the general.

I do expect to get slid pretty hard eventually. It's aready 11:24am in Tel Aviv, so it'll be interesting to see when all the shilling commences.

>>2219216

>the list

/h8pol/ had a brief campaign where they compiled a list of traitorous journalists (on a separate board, I think) and tweeted that they just made #TheList. Scared a lotta them, but then there were implications of violence and it all got shut down. If it's just an innocuous list of untrustworthy people, I'm all for it. They should be sorted by threat level, mode of induction, industry or something.

>>2219216

>>2219320

Just looked, board's still there

>>>/thelist/