ABLECHILD: Flawed Report Ignores Key Facts, Leaving America Vulnerable to Future Assassination Attempts 1/2
By Guest Contributor Dec. 18, 2024
The Reality of the Bipartisan Task Force Investigation into Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump.
The Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump Final Report. Sounds impressive. A Task Force. Like Storming a beachhead or cracking down on organized crime. Unfortunately, in the case of this Congressional committee, the American People did not get its money’s worth.
In fact, after months of “investigating” the result of those efforts consists of what the People already knew…the Secret Service did an extremely lousy job of protecting the then former President.
Do the People know why the alleged shooter attacked the then former President? No.Do the People know what physical evidence was collected to determine who was the alleged shooter? You know like DNA, fingerprints, photographs? Nope.
Did the Congressional Task Force interview the parents of the alleged shooter to determine what the family may have known about the shooting event, or did it bother to have a conversation with the alleged shooter’s employer?
You know an employer who had a recent photo of the alleged shooter and not some insulting High School photo.No. Neither of those interviews happened.
But the Task Force did provide the American People one hell of a photo op when its members took a day trip to Butler Pennsylvaniato get a firsthand look at the rally venue and stand on the roof of the AGR building. How impressive. But was it worth the expense when the Task Force only came away with the Secret Service didn’t do its job?
AbleChild has been following the investigations associated with the attempted assassination in Butler, PA, and held some hope that that Task Force might provide some much-needed answers. Unfortunately, the Task Force Final Report leaves much to be desired so AbleChild must continue to ask the obvious questions.
For example, on Page 24 of the Final Report it is acknowledged that “at approximately 1:30p.m. Crooks’ father gave him the rifle that would later be used in the assassination attempt. The firearm was legally transferred to Crooks by his father the year prior.
Crooks told his father that he was going to the local gun range…” It seems obvious to ask if the father legally transferred the weapon to his son the prior year, why would the father have to give him the weapon?
Seriously, why would the son have to ask for the gun if he owned it for a year and, according to Senator Grassley’s report, the alleged shooter used it all the time at the local gun range?
But it gets weirder, on Page 16 it is explained that “at 10:56p.m. Crooks’ father placed a 911 call regarding his son, stating that he had left earlier that afternoon with his rifle…and uncharacteristically had not returned home. The 911 dispatcher escalated this information, which was then relayed to the AFT.”
According to several news accounts, including Fox, BBC, CNN and CBS, the alleged shooter’s father made a call to law enforcement about his son being missing with a weapon.What’s really bizarre is that all news accounts report that the call was made prior to the shooting incident.
Then the Task Force explains that “Crooks’ father exited the residence, stepped onto the front porch, and asked something to the effect of “Is it true? CNN called me and told me that (redacted) shot Trump.”What? This is just stupid...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/ablechild-flawed-report-ignores-key-facts-leaving-america/