Anonymous ID: 298ebf Dec. 19, 2024, 6:55 a.m. No.22192636   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3003

>>22192585

>If you or someone you know may be experiencing symptoms of a factitious disorder, seek help from a qualified healthcare professional.

 

I have more medical training than Bill Gates and offer discount lobotomies. With about two months lead time I can be set up for electroshock therapy

Anonymous ID: 298ebf Dec. 19, 2024, 7:59 a.m. No.22193063   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3212 >>3231 >>3323 >>3416

>>22192989

 

archive offline, remember?

Canada #58 >>20902152

US profits from climate change loans to poor countries โ€“ media

A program billed as fighting global warming has reportedly funneled back billions of dollars to wealthy nations

22 May, 2024

 

A program that ostensibly helps developing nations deal with the effects of climate change has reportedly generated windfall profits for Japan, the US, and other wealthy countries, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

 

The gains stem from a pledge to provide $100 billion a year to help poor nations cope with climate change and undertake projects to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, according to the report, which cites an analysis of UN and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) data. Benefactor countries have channeled money from the program back into their own economies, reaping billions of dollars in profits, it says.

 

Japan, the US, France, Germany, and other wealthy nations have made the initiative a money-making opportunity by extending loans at market rates โ€“ rather than giving grants or low-interest financing โ€“ or insisting that the recipients hire their companies to carry out the projects. Reuters said it identified nearly $22 billion in loans and grants that came with such strings attached.

 

โ€œOffering climate loans at market rates or conditioning funding on hiring certain companies means that money meant for developing countries gets sent back to wealthy ones,โ€ Reuters said. Liane Schalatek, associate director with Germanyโ€™s Heinrich-Boll Foundation policy think tank, called the tactics โ€œdeeply reprehensible.โ€ She added, โ€œClimate finance provision should not be a business opportunity.โ€

 

The funding pledges were first made in 2009, supposedly to help poor countries that were disproportionately harmed by climate change. Roughly $353 billion was paid from 2015 through 2020. Reuters said more than half of that money came in the form of loans, which indebted poorer nations used โ€œto solve problems largely caused by the developed world.โ€

 

Andres Mogro, Ecuadorโ€™s former director of climate initiatives, said the program heaped a new wave of debt on the global south. โ€œItโ€™s like setting a building on fire and then selling the fire extinguishers outside.โ€

 

Ritu Bharadwaj, a researcher at the UK-based International Institute for Environment and Development, told Reuters that the benefits reaped by developed nations have overshadowed the programโ€™s primary objective of supporting climate action in poorer countries. โ€œThis is a classic example where a bad loan, which has been given to a country in the garb of climate finance, will create further financial stress.โ€

 

https://www.rt.com/news/598074-wealthy-nations-profit-from-climate-loans/

Anonymous ID: 298ebf Dec. 19, 2024, 8:33 a.m. No.22193290   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22193174

At some stage the Navy got tired of hearing the complaints about jungles and developed a variable-time fuze for the 16 inch rounds. The shell would head downrange a hundred yards or so then detonate becoming an actual ton of steel shrapnel. Naval Rifle became Naval Shotgun.