Anonymous ID: 896b88 Dec. 20, 2024, 10:42 a.m. No.22200475   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0496

>>22199866 The House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government released a more than 17,000-page report (Actually 17,019 Total Pages)PN

KUDOS to the House Select Committee, the amount of data included in these reports is impressive, and to putting together the entire REAL Conspiracy to Defeat Trump and MAGA in 2020, is extremely complicated==

 

Excerpts from Part 2: REPORT: ELECTION INTERFERENCE: HOW THE FBI “PREBUNKED” A TRUE STORY ABOUT THE BIDEN FAMILY’S CORRUPTION IN ADVANCE OF THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Anon’s this is all the proof that anyone needs to solidly find out, that the 2020 election was rigged (in many ways) and stolen, by the FBI with other agencies, and Social Media, knew the plan was to steal the electionThe words,”knowingly and willingly, is all over this document. 2020 is NOT OVER YET! page 2-3

 

“But, when we get hauled up to [Capitol] hill to testify on why we influenced the 2020 elections we can say we have been meeting for YEARS with USG [U.S. Government] to plan for it.”

—July 15, 2020, 3:17 p.m. ET, internal Facebook message during Facebook’s meeting with the FBI and other agencies. 1

 

At 5:00 a.m. ET, on Wednesday, October 14, 2020, less than three weeks before the 2020 presidential election, the New York Post published a potentially election-altering news story about a years-long influence peddling scheme carried out by the family of the Democratic nominee for president, former Vice President Joe Biden. 2 The Post article detailed how Hunter Biden leveraged his famous last name to provide foreign officials with access to his father in exchange for the Biden family’s significant financial gain…

 

Soon after the Post article was published, however, something strange happened. Almost immediately, major social media platforms, including Twitter and Facebook—the modern-day digital town square—censored the true story about Biden family influence peddling. As a consequence, millions of Americans cast their presidential vote unaware of serious, credible allegations of misconduct levied against one of the two candidates. This censorship served to benefit one candidate over the other and wrongfully affected the 2020 election.6 Today, these companies andtheir executives belatedlyadmit that their censorship was wrong.7

Why were the social media companies so ready to censora true story about Hunter Biden featured in a prominent American newspaper?Because the FBI had primed them for it. For nearly a year, the FBI had been conditioning social media companies to expect a “hack-andleak” operation from Russia involving Hunter Biden.In more than thirty meetings across eight months, the FBI led Big Tech to believe that the allegations in the Post story were Russian disinformation, even though the FBI had authenticated Hunter Biden’s laptop nearly a year prior. 8

 

Beginning in early 2020, the FBI embarked on a concerted campaign to preemptively debunk—or “prebunk”—allegations about the Biden family’s influence peddling. Federal agencies repeatedly warned social media platforms about a pre-election Russian influence operation relating to Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian company Burisma.9 In many of these meetings between federal agencies and Big Tech, the FBI raised the topic of potential “hack-andleak” operations amid conversations about “election security” and potential foreign influence operations.10 In response,some platforms even adopted new content moderation policiesspecifically designed to address hacked materials….

The FBI’s duplicity notwithstanding,Big Tech companies bear blame as well. Contemporaneous documents from the relevant periodshow that social media companies recognizedand received information that the Biden family influence peddling allegationswere likely not Russian disinformation; 17 nonetheless senior leadership at these companies decided to take steps to hide this true content highly relevant to the upcoming presidential election because they knew a failure to censor the story could affect how a potential incoming Biden-Harris Administration would treat them. 18

Obviously, our calls on this could colour the way an incoming Biden administration views us more than almost anything else…”—Oct. 14, 2020, internal messages between Facebook’s then-Vice President of Global Affairs Nick Clegg to Vice President of Global Public Policy Joel Kaplan about Facebook’s censorship of the New York Post article

 

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/2024-12/Part-2-Final-Weaponization-Report-Compilation.pdf

Anonymous ID: 896b88 Dec. 20, 2024, 10:48 a.m. No.22200496   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22200475

Reading through this, the TECH people, knew exactly what the FBI was doing in 2020 and they willingly joined them, so all their apologies, were big fat LYING LIES, and they consistently lied to Congress.

 

Big TECH was in on it. So Zuckerberg take your donation money and shove it up your ass.Really a measly $1 million to Trump.

 

Most of all the late comer Tech guys, hate Trump, and he knows it. David Sacks is working with Trump to identify the ones, that may cause problems, is my guess.

Anonymous ID: 896b88 Dec. 20, 2024, 11:02 a.m. No.22200587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0593

>>22200505

They need a new speaker for the very fact that Johnson is inept, and caves, but he is 3rd in line to be President if anything happens. That's what they need to consider.

 

Johnson has been a failure from the start,

Anonymous ID: 896b88 Dec. 20, 2024, 11:34 a.m. No.22200686   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0691 >>0768

Mike Johnson Attempts Plan C to Avert Government Shutdown

(I think that picture is insinuating something, weird.)

12/20/24

 

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on Friday announced yet another plan to avert a government shutdown.

 

“Yeah, yeah, we have a plan. We’re expecting votes this morning, so you all stay tuned. We’ve got a plan,” Johnson said Friday morning as he entered the Capitol building.

 

The government will shut down if Congress fails to pass a spending bill by the end of Friday.

 

The House rejected a short-term spending bill after Republican leadership scrapped a compromise plan with Democrats that was riddled with Democrat carveouts, and benefits to Big Pharma, among other controversial issues.

Breitbart News’s Bradley Jaye wrote:

 

An astonishing 38 Republicans voted against the hastily assembled, Trump-endorsed deal, with nine not voting.

 

Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance stepped in Wednesday afternoon to drive the final stake in the heart of a previous deal negotiated by House Speaker Mike Johnson and Democrats. Support for that deal was deteriorating rapidly ahead of Trump taking action to reframe the debate, insisting the deal should have included a debt limit increase to take the tricky issue off his administration’s plate next Congress.

 

The new deal removed over a thousand pages of pork and other provisions unrelated to keeping the government open.

 

House Freedom Caucus chairman Andy Harris (R-MD) said on Friday morning he would accept a clean stop-gap spending bill, known as a continuing resolution (CR).

 

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) said,“We’re not cutting deals with Democrats.”She added that there will be a plan “very similar to President Trump’s plan yesterday.”

 

President-elect Donald Trump said that if the government were to shutdown, it should happen on President Joe Biden’s watch.

It remains unclear if Democrats and Biden would approve of clean CR to continue funding the government.

 

“If there is going to be a shutdown of government, let it begin now, under the Biden Administration, not after January 20th, under ‘TRUMP.’ This is a Biden problem to solve, but if Republicans can help solve it, they will!” Trump wrote.

While many in Washington, DC, have fretted about the potential impact of a government shutdown,Breitbart News Economics Editor John Carney wrote that shutdowns barely impact the economy, as evidenced by the five-week shutdown in late 2018.

 

(My guess is dems will cave today and vote for plan C, because they all want to get out of town for Christmas and New Years, they love their holidays too much to let the government shut down. On the other hand the Republicans don’t care if they shut down, so the 38 will get what they want.)

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/20/mike-johnson-attempts-plan-c-avert-government-shutdown/

Anonymous ID: 896b88 Dec. 20, 2024, 11:51 a.m. No.22200749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0768

Trump: We’re Going to Knock Out the PBM Middlemen, Get Drug Costs Down19 Dec 2024 (The Middlemen are who stole the 2020 election when Trump threatened this.)

 

The following content is sponsored by Americans for Limited Government.

President-elect Donald Trump vowed to take on big Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) at a Monday press conference at Mar-a-Lago. “The horrible middleman that makes more money, frankly, than the drug companies, and they don’t do anything except they’re a middleman—we’re going to knock out the middleman,” Trump said.

 

He explained that by eliminating BPMs, “We’re going to get drug costs down at levels that nobody has ever seen before.”

 

Trump noted that Health and Human Services nominee Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services nominee Dr. Mehmet Oz had discussed reforming PBMs extensively, “I tell you, we spend more time talking about that with Bobby and with the executives and Oz, all of them. We spent more time talking about that than anything else.”

 

One of the biggest reasons for high prescription prices is Big Insurance PBMs.

Three giant PBM middlemen—CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx—control about 80 percent of the entire PBM marketand administer drug benefits for over 270 million Americans.

 

PBMs inflate their profits by pushing more expensive medicines when designing formularies and the list of drugs available to their customers. By setting favorable prices and cost-sharing amounts, PBMs practically dictate the amount patients pay out of pocket and which medicines they can access. If a drug isn’t on the formulary, insurers won’t cover it; and often, doctors won’t prescribe it even if the patient needs it.

 

Kevin Duane, a pharmacist from Jacksonville, Florida, recently told the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability,“Patients and their doctors have virtually no say in what drugs are used, since the PBM essentially forces which drugs can be used – not because a drug is better or worse, but because the PBM can make more money from it.”

 

Essentially, PBMs are incentivized to prescribe more expensive medicines.

It’s a broken system that Trump started to fix before. In 2020, Trump introduced a policy allowing seniors to directly benefit from rebates that drug manufacturers pay to PBMs for preferential placement on insurers’ drug formularies. These rebates were intended to reduce the cost of expensive medications for seniors. Trump presented a detailed plan to deliver these savings to seniors, potentially saving them billions of dollars. (I can confirm this, a brand name drug was prescribed and had been taking for 2 years, one time the doctor forgot to write in the RX “DAW” or Dispense as Written, and the pharmacy tried to charge me $4,000 when the drug costs $100, that’s only one of the tricks they use.)

 

“So, the patients are going to be now getting the benefit, instead of these very wealthy individuals,” Trump said at the time. “Today’s action ends this injustice and requires that these discounts go directly to the people. These are the people that need it.”

 

Unfortunately, Joe Biden repealed the Trump drug rebate rule with the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, preventing those seniors most at risk from getting the savings they needed.Trump and his healthcare team will undoubtedly bring back the Trump Rebate Rule and massive savings for seniors.

 

Recently, over 20 conservative groups encouraged Congress to pass The Modernizing and Ensuring PBM Accountability Act (S. 2973) and the Mental Health, Lower-Cost Drug and Extenders Package (S. 3430). These bills would reset the money-making incentives to benefit patientsby delinking PBM fees from the price of medicine. Breaking the link between the price of drugs and the fees PBMs charge will help to fix incentives in the system that drive up seniors’ drug costs and PBM profits.

 

Knock out the PBM middlemen, fix a corrupt system, and deliver savings to America’s seniors. It would be a great start to Trump’s healthcare agenda. (It’s not only seniors, it’s all people.)

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/19/trump-were-going-to-knock-out-the-pbm-middlemen-get-drug-costs-down/