>>22199866 The House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government released a more than 17,000-page report (Actually 17,019 Total Pages)PN
KUDOS to the House Select Committee, the amount of data included in these reports is impressive, and to putting together the entire REAL Conspiracy to Defeat Trump and MAGA in 2020, is extremely complicated==
Excerpts from Part 2: REPORT: ELECTION INTERFERENCE: HOW THE FBI “PREBUNKED” A TRUE STORY ABOUT THE BIDEN FAMILY’S CORRUPTION IN ADVANCE OF THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
Anon’s this is all the proof that anyone needs to solidly find out, that the 2020 election was rigged (in many ways) and stolen, by the FBI with other agencies, and Social Media, knew the plan was to steal the electionThe words,”knowingly and willingly, is all over this document. 2020 is NOT OVER YET! page 2-3
“But, when we get hauled up to [Capitol] hill to testify on why we influenced the 2020 elections we can say we have been meeting for YEARS with USG [U.S. Government] to plan for it.”
—July 15, 2020, 3:17 p.m. ET, internal Facebook message during Facebook’s meeting with the FBI and other agencies. 1
At 5:00 a.m. ET, on Wednesday, October 14, 2020, less than three weeks before the 2020 presidential election, the New York Post published a potentially election-altering news story about a years-long influence peddling scheme carried out by the family of the Democratic nominee for president, former Vice President Joe Biden. 2 The Post article detailed how Hunter Biden leveraged his famous last name to provide foreign officials with access to his father in exchange for the Biden family’s significant financial gain…
Soon after the Post article was published, however, something strange happened. Almost immediately, major social media platforms, including Twitter and Facebook—the modern-day digital town square—censored the true story about Biden family influence peddling. As a consequence, millions of Americans cast their presidential vote unaware of serious, credible allegations of misconduct levied against one of the two candidates. This censorship served to benefit one candidate over the other and wrongfully affected the 2020 election.6 Today, these companies andtheir executives belatedlyadmit that their censorship was wrong.7
Why were the social media companies so ready to censora true story about Hunter Biden featured in a prominent American newspaper?Because the FBI had primed them for it. For nearly a year, the FBI had been conditioning social media companies to expect a “hack-andleak” operation from Russia involving Hunter Biden.In more than thirty meetings across eight months, the FBI led Big Tech to believe that the allegations in the Post story were Russian disinformation, even though the FBI had authenticated Hunter Biden’s laptop nearly a year prior. 8
Beginning in early 2020, the FBI embarked on a concerted campaign to preemptively debunk—or “prebunk”—allegations about the Biden family’s influence peddling. Federal agencies repeatedly warned social media platforms about a pre-election Russian influence operation relating to Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian company Burisma.9 In many of these meetings between federal agencies and Big Tech, the FBI raised the topic of potential “hack-andleak” operations amid conversations about “election security” and potential foreign influence operations.10 In response,some platforms even adopted new content moderation policiesspecifically designed to address hacked materials….
The FBI’s duplicity notwithstanding,Big Tech companies bear blame as well. Contemporaneous documents from the relevant periodshow that social media companies recognizedand received information that the Biden family influence peddling allegationswere likely not Russian disinformation; 17 nonetheless senior leadership at these companies decided to take steps to hide this true content highly relevant to the upcoming presidential election because they knew a failure to censor the story could affect how a potential incoming Biden-Harris Administration would treat them. 18
Obviously, our calls on this could colour the way an incoming Biden administration views us more than almost anything else…”—Oct. 14, 2020, internal messages between Facebook’s then-Vice President of Global Affairs Nick Clegg to Vice President of Global Public Policy Joel Kaplan about Facebook’s censorship of the New York Post article
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/2024-12/Part-2-Final-Weaponization-Report-Compilation.pdf