making it illegal to discuss them?
lately I find that the only way to endure being here is to shut off the images.
>>22205344
this is an obvious filter.
someone who uses words to paint a picture of a depraved person, but doesn't use them well as if he used them well this would never get shown to anyone.
why do they get anything? the answer:
they are slaves and their masters want them healthy.
their master want them to have free access to opioids and stimulants.
their medical masters are the henchmen of the cabal.
does that sound about right? I might have some of it wrong.
the group that says it's OK to cheat goys is upset that someone is portrayed that way in a fiction.
go figure.
who says I'm not?
and see who the hater is.
you show yourself as the disgusting stereotype of the one who escalates and slanders.
you don't even deny what I accuse.
wow.
and how do you expect anyone to respect you?
you play the part of the person people love to hate and besmirch your own crowd.
you are the reason for the hatred you despise.
your behavior makes that hatred worse.
you don't?
sad for you.
you're a typical tribal bully: you're so coddled and fat that you fail to understand what a pig you seem to eveyrone else.
you actually believe the lies and slander and feel justified in accusing anyone who dares to challange you as being 'Hitler'
you will have to answer to your pig-headed nature, and the swinishness towards all those who tell you: your tactics make people hate you.
you act like a loathsome self-entitled stereotype.
your tribe has ran a neptotism racket for generations.
your wealth is illgotten gains of a jaded group of elites.
someday you'll understand
you'll see how you got fat off of illgotten wealth.
you'll suddenly see how you were wrong about all of it, how the lies were piled on lies and the people you trusted fed you false history and made you hate people who you would have otherwise been friends with.
sad
now you do a two word response that indicates your own stupidity.