Anonymous ID: f589d4 Dec. 22, 2024, 4:42 p.m. No.22212680   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2696 >>2762

>>22212391 lb

"vividh dṛśyaṃ hasyamānaṃ nagarī tulyaṃ jīvantgatam"

 

The city, It is seen. A vision.

"like a self-luminous

mirror reflecting objects within."

 

The "mirror" is the "screen" hence the anlogy to a "movie"

 

>>22212391

"vividh dṛśyaṃ hasyamānaṃ nagarī tulyaṃ jīvantgatam"

 

The city, It is seen. A vision.

"like a self-luminous

mirror reflecting objects within."

 

>>22211639 lb

>>22211638 lb

>>22211648 lb

 

>>22212019 lb

>>22212045 lb

>>22212391 lb

 

KalAgni is the Fire which is TIME' which devours all

 

The Corpus Clock which seemed to opened in conjunction with CERN is called

"Time Eater" - (or had some connect with both CERN and spacecraft X37?)

 

The Corpus Clock, located in Cambridge, England, is known as the "Time Eater" due to its unique and striking design by artist and inventor Dr. John C. Taylor. Here's why:

 

Design: The clock features a large, grasshopper-like mechanism that appears to be devouring time. This creature, officially named the "Chronophage" (which means "time eater" in Greek), moves its jaws around the clock face, symbolizing the relentless passage of time.

Visual Effect: Every five seconds, the Chronophage's jaws snap shut, and a blue light flashes from one of the 60 slits around the clock face, representing each second passing. This gives the visual impression that the creature is literally eating or consuming time.

Philosophical Concept: The design embodies the concept that time is fleeting and constantly being devoured by the inexorable march forward. This reflects a philosophical or poetic view of time, emphasizing its relentless and often unnoticed consumption of our lives.

Contrast with Traditional Clocks: Unlike traditional clocks where time is measured in a straightforward manner, the Corpus Clock uses this dramatic imagery to make viewers more aware of time's passage, perhaps urging them to reflect on how they use or lose time.

 

Thus, the nickname "Time Eater" perfectly encapsulates both the clock's mechanical operation and its thematic intent, making it not just a timepiece but a piece of art that comments on the nature of time itself.

Anonymous ID: f589d4 Dec. 22, 2024, 5:03 p.m. No.22212805   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22212767

someone set on fire a sleeping person on fire today

>>22212532

The still shot didn't look normal.

The fire was between train cars.

And seemed way too big for just throwing lighted matches on someone.

https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1870921294277222759

Anonymous ID: f589d4 Dec. 22, 2024, 5:41 p.m. No.22213048   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3304

>>22213017

>>22213000

>>22213017

 

CARTER

Dude doesn't listen to Trump speechs. Likely fails to read the Q drops either.

What are these ignorant scabs doing here

Go back

The President of the United States who signed the treaties that eventually handed over the Panama Canal to Panama was Jimmy Carter. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties, signed in 1977, outlined the transfer of control from the United States to Panama,

Anonymous ID: f589d4 Dec. 22, 2024, 5:45 p.m. No.22213071   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22213042

victim fagging. That's a good one.

Glad someone finally named that act.

 

Didn't Putin call out the NWO criminals for eating humans?

Called them Vampires who feed on human flesh.

That's pretty front and center, Putin.

Anonymous ID: f589d4 Dec. 22, 2024, 6:25 p.m. No.22213329   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22213304

Wonder why Trump thinks he can take it back now.

Another shady deal like the one that enabled Barry to send cash to Iran.

It was a cover-up for what really happened.

We'll see what happens.

99 year lease? wonder what year that was up.

Oh look at that.

The guy calling me a TARD

us a liar. Figures.

"The notion of a 99-year lease for the Panama Canal is a common misconception. The United States did not have a 99-year lease for the Panama Canal. Instead, under the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty signed in 1903, the U.S. was granted rights to build, operate, and indefinitely administer the Panama Canal Zone. The term "99-year lease" likely stems from a misunderstanding or confusion with the wording in Article 22 of the treaty, which does not specify a 99-year term. The control of the canal was transferred back to Panama in 1999 under the terms of the 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties."