>>2221589 (lb)
If it was in NY it wasn't illegal. In NYS as love as one party is aware of the recording it's admissible. But the part about client/lawyer shit, you'd think he would get i trouble for that. If he is even a Lawyer anymore
The Notables are a fucking embarrassment by the way.
Baker, I bet you're the type of guy that if a girl starts crying in front of you, you give into whatever they want just so they stop crying.
Or you just don't even bother reading anything & just mindlessly use whatever link anyone said was Notable.
Because Seriously, wtf
Bitch, don't jump into the middle of a conversation with your unasked for and unnecessary opinion.
Is he suppose to fire anyone that isn't a yes man?
That's not his style.
Only tools do that
As long as it's an actual sourced article. With real sources & not from websites KNOWN to be frauds.
Old news
Hey newfag, STFU.
I didn't say private conversation. I'm saying the asshat doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Like you!
No one asked what your rambling excuse is for being illiterate. Piss off fatty.
Old news, already is n notables & talked about the day it was reported
What about your wife
You know by reading the article & verify the sources.
Is it an "Insider source"? Friend of a friend that knew this one guy?
Do any supporting documents have links to their source? (scribd is not a source)
But mainly, use common sense.
Lately a lot of this has been getting forgotten/ignored & people seem to just post anything they feel like it without doing even the minimum to verify.
Along with that theres also a lot of SJW types(that's the closest group I can think of to describe it) Who will attack anyone who questions a post with an article.
Like they are trying to push the idea that facts don't really matter much as long as the article says what we want it to.
Basically they are trying to make us look like idiots who don't source anything & believes everything we read as long as it comes from InfoWars type of a site.
Sorry for the rant, this isn't aimed at you. This has been bugging me for a while now lol
I'm still trying to read through this thread & I haven't had time to check Twitter yet, but did anything come from this? Last night before I went to bed, he already tweeted out excuses & bullshit about those tweets, then mass deleted a bunch, then I read some Twitter and a lot of libs were defending him saying it was all just a joke. He was just being "edgy"
But it wasn't ignored right?