>>2861542

Of the US or the world?

Because if they were in control of the world, why is the EU, UK, helping Iran? Why are China still a giant bag of dicks? Q has indicated his plans can and do change, and I'm not entrusting my personal safety to someone online who I don't know personally.

And I'm not so sure Q would want us to be entirely dependent on him either, wouldn't make for a very useful force if we can't even weather a disaster.

Preppers have been a thing long before Q was here, and they'll be a thing long after, too. Nothing wrong with being prepared.

>>2862402

I like how you ignore my rebuttals.

Q even said the internet would be killed. You're still hedging bets on crypto? How are you going to trade if it goes dead?

Geez, shills in force tonight.