Why not bring out the back up troops, the anons and masses?
Many are in bad situations while the bad guys are being accommodated.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/20/rubio-scott-lead-assault-on-conservative-judge-take-down-qualified-nominee/
Toll on the soul matters.
It comes down to choices….and those are becoming more and more apparent.
Perplexing and disturbing when so many simple, unobtrusive, accommodations and fixes are available, ready and ripe for the plucking….if only they were seen and acted upon.
Since they are not, questions arise… Why not do those easy things that wouldn’t impact the larger scope?
Hmmm….
Please explain in detail, for the record what, specifically you mean or are saying.
So many wrong and inaccurate predictions that go unacknowledged and uncorrected.
That is, to learn from mistakes, the mistakes must be acknowledged and reviewed for adjustments….to….hopefully….improve accuracy.
Thus, it is necessary to be specific….and acknowledge either way, correct or incorrect after the fact.
Aye. Good point….which was the point.
Q hasn’t posted. Many have been counting on Q Comms.
Q and/or the Q phenomenon has built certain and high expectations in and for individuals…your fellow citizens.
Animals and/or people can only remain in that heightened state for so long before it takes a toll on them and one of the subsequent states is adopted. Though the results and states vary by individual, the known result does not. People adopt one or more of those states.
(Think action and reaction.)
It appears that “The Plan”did not account for the situations encountered by the good guys, anons, ordinary folks and the masss. It appears that “The Plan” considered the bad guys and their actions, reactions, counter-actions, needs, hopes, and human qualities….
But….what about those same considerations for the affected good guys?
Apparently they were given the “not so much” priority in “The Plan.”
Disappointing…but hoping to suggest the planners consider the additional considerations.
Certainly reading the Bible can help in many instances, but not all.
Who would tell the drowning man to read the Bible? Any who would do so instead of jumping in to help and rescue…are pretty callous individuals.
It’s always an interesting situation and somewhat of a dilemma when one replies to a situation without understanding it.. Should the reply be sarcastic, explanatory….or perhaps just ignore the ignorance?
Since you asked a question somewhat arrogantly and sarcastically, it seems apparent that you consider yourself to be a Wile E. Coyote, Suuuuper Genius.
You have no idea nor can even fathom comprehending what others have endured. Those were the individuals at the crux of the post. The individuals to whom the message was directed would understand its content and context.
So…maybe just STFU and “Lurk moar.” 😂
Interesting how you can suggest reading the I le in one post then IMMEDIATELY turn to name calling in the next.
But, to respond to your comment, no, I’m not drowning. I wasn’t referring to myself, sport. I actually think of others. Try it. Pretty sure that message is in the Bible!
Notice how the posting has devolved…a direct correlation to the lack of Q posts.
Aye. Thanks. Elevating is important.
Pretty sure you tried to make a point somewhere in that blather, but still not sure what it was other than to obfuscate because you realized your previous response was stupid.
A nerve? No. Laughing at a cat toy….yes.
You are dishonest and lack logic skills. You rejected being held to your words, content and context. Why would you cite the Bible if you didn’t hold to its principles?
You lack debate skills and integrity.
Again interesting to see such a reply when several jumped in and replied to a post not directed at them.