Anonymous ID: 29f84c Dec. 28, 2024, 3:09 p.m. No.22245754   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6001

>>22245744

who is mad at the Indians?

they are adorable, huggable, and awesome.

It's their cabal bosses, or the high caste ones who loose their humility, that are the problem.

Most Indians are amazingly sensitive loving giving cuddly and wonderful.

Makes me want to go to Channai and ride around with a monk on a motor scooter in the late afternoon.

Anonymous ID: 29f84c Dec. 28, 2024, 3:31 p.m. No.22245841   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6001

>>22245773

I've watched some travel videos of someone I respect who goes there quite often.

there are all kinds of interesting and friendly people everywhere, some of them seem very compatable with me. I think I'd like going there and meeting some of them

If you've got a billion people do you really think that they are all, everyone of them, messed up?

of course not.

Anonymous ID: 29f84c Dec. 28, 2024, 3:38 p.m. No.22245868   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22245860

I remember being here at 5 AM here and the trolls would be making lunch dates with each other, thinking that America wasn't awake then. I'd post stuff and they would flip out and hound me for the rest of the days.

I tried to make it sound like a meet cute at the office, like they fell in love and get married. They could never just let it go.

they don't even like us if we try to like them . . .

Anonymous ID: 29f84c Dec. 28, 2024, 4:27 p.m. No.22246118   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6192

>>22246105

they make up new skills that don't even exist except for those who are trained by the manufactures of the products to use them.

so they can guarantee that no America will have that skill set.

they come up with 'software toolsets' that thinly wrap older toolsets and claim it's all new. You don't have that on your resume they don't make the offer. Meanwhile the only ones who do are those who they have trained to have it.

that's how they can exclude and say people are 'unqualified'.

Anonymous ID: 29f84c Dec. 28, 2024, 4:34 p.m. No.22246164   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22246136

there was this thing that microsoft used to do:

they would constantly 'upgrade' their toolsets.

and only those who worked closely with microsoft would ever have the new toolsets on their resume.

and meanwhile they'd sell the compilers and tools, but in their own in house shops thye were ALREADY USING the next generation tools.

the would sell opsolete toolsets to the clients, and use new toolsets in house.

they should have been prohibited from being in the compiler and toolset software space!

 

IBM was antitrusted and the Microsoft did things that were FAR WORSE to make a far more odious monopoly.

 

if they'd have had their way there would be no Linux, no Android, nothing but windows.

 

And windows was designed to be broken.

you'd have to reboot it to do simple things like change the IP configuration.

 

It was beyond stupid.

Anonymous ID: 29f84c Dec. 28, 2024, 4:41 p.m. No.22246223   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6234 >>6273

>>22246192

engineers are quick learners.

the 'skillsets' that are listed are proxies for other sets of skills.

most 'software methodologies' are just designed so that systems can be handed from those who made them to others who know nothing about them.

Microsoft was always a con-man run outfit.

they had tools that wrapped other people's tools.

they made it harder, not easier.

they were already working on next generation stuff while they would tell that the last generation stuff was the 'next big thing'

 

if you don't hire and engineer because he didn't have visual basic . . . or flow charts on his resume then you didn't hire not because those things are 'hard to learn' or 'necessary' but because you just didn't want that one.

if visual basic was necessary to do the task any competent engineer could learn it rather quickly.