Anonymous ID: d87ebd Dec. 28, 2024, 3:26 p.m. No.22245828   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22245760

>would like to say, that consider it a bit arrogant that some bakers nowadays don't even bother to include different opinions/discussions and simply ignore notables that don't fit their own opinions

>that is very biased and sad

 

sounds just like some anons.

kek.

Anonymous ID: d87ebd Dec. 28, 2024, 4:43 p.m. No.22246229   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6245

>>22246173

well-said.

Remember Trump talking about red flag laws in early Aug 2019, when the public was hysterical about it. Then never following up.

 

Effective politicians never go DIRECTLY against public hysteria, have to state indirect and circumspect (i.e, "we'll look at it", whatever it is).

> [They] are still trying to divide MAGA and this is just another tactic.

Right - trying to force Trump to renounce Elon, divide the movement.

>For the record, I don't like Elon's position at all.

Once it's a big deal, it's not about his position, people say stupid things all the time. Important thing is watching how Trump finesses the situation โ€“ which he will.

>The common enemy is the only enemy.

AMEN.