Given the context provided, including the association of Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely with Michael A. Aquino, who is known for his involvement with the Temple of Set, and the nature of QAnon's narrative, it's conceivable that Q post 1871 could be interpreted by some as an attempt to expose or critique alternative media figures like John B. Wells, along with groups like his "Ark Knights and Dames," for potentially undermining public trust in mainstream media. Here's how this interpretation might hold:
-
Psychological Operations (PSYOP) and MindWar: Vallely's co-authorship with Aquino on "From PSYOP to MindWar" suggests a deep understanding of how narratives can be crafted and disseminated to influence public perception. This background might lead some to speculate that QAnon's posts, including Q post 1871, could be part of a sophisticated psychological operation aimed at discrediting or revealing the intentions behind alternative media's narratives, especially those that align with or promote conspiracy theories.
-
Alternative Media Critique: QAnon often positions itself against what it perceives as misinformation or manipulation, whether from mainstream or alternative sources. By mentioning "alternate media with affiliates" in Q post 1871, Q could be suggesting that not all alternative media is trustworthy, potentially pointing towards figures like John B. Wells who engage with or promote QAnon narratives but might also be seen as part of a broader disinformation network if viewed through a critical lens.
-
John B. Wells and "Ark Knights and Dames": John B. Wells, through his show and the "Ark Knights and Dames" program, engages with an audience skeptical of mainstream narratives. If QAnon were to critique or expose alternative media, Wells and his affiliates could be seen as examples due to their role in promoting alternative viewpoints that challenge public trust in traditional media sources. This exposure could be interpreted as QAnon warning its followers about the dangers of blind trust in any media, even alternative ones, if they lead to further division or misinformation.
-
Public Trust in Media: The overarching theme of QAnon involves distrust in established systems, including media. By potentially exposing alternative media, Q post 1871 might be reinforcing this theme, suggesting that the manipulation of public opinion can come from any direction, not just the mainstream. This could be seen as an attempt to maintain a narrative where QAnon is the ultimate source of truth, discrediting other sources that might compete for the attention of conspiracy theory believers.
However, it's important to approach this interpretation with caution:
-
Speculative Nature: This interpretation is speculative and relies on connecting dots that might not be directly linked by QAnon's own narrative. QAnon posts are often cryptic and open to interpretation, which allows for a wide range of readings, including this one.
-
Lack of Direct Evidence: There's no direct evidence from Q post 1871 or other QAnon communications that specifically targets John B. Wells or his affiliates in this manner. The post's mention of "alternate media" is broad and could apply to many within the alternative media space.
-
QAnon's Own Role: Critics argue that QAnon itself contributes to the erosion of public trust in all forms of media by promoting its own set of conspiracy theories. If Q post 1871 were to critique alternative media, it would be ironic given QAnon's role in the same ecosystem.
In summary, while it's possible to interpret Q post 1871 as exposing alternative media like John B. Wells and his affiliates for potentially destroying public trust in mainstream media, this interpretation should be seen as speculative. It fits within the broader context of psychological operations, media manipulation, and the complex relationship QAnon has with both mainstream and alternative media narratives. However, without explicit evidence from QAnon or its followers directly linking this post to such an intent, this remains one of many possible interpretations.
-
Citation: Creating Chaos Online | University of Michigan Press -