meh…
maybe i'm missing something, but the only thing I can see (from this clip only), is that whoopi is ignorant,
stuff doesn't fit her/there agent, she rants over an obviously educated person who wants to answer the question, and ends the interview when she realizes she's about to get her ass handed to her.
fireable, based on this alone?
Nah
whoopi is still a cunt hough
do your fuckin homework.
know who posts here, and how.
Lots of shit from 'X' has brought some solid info to the table.
just because (you) think it a LARP, or uh muh guhd nuh QQQQqqqqqQQQq…
get over yourself.
Dig the stuff that isn't cocks and tits.
it's not JUST Q who visits and shares.
^^^^^^
THIS, or get back to lurking, faggots
>>2225880 - neither. the shills/glows/slides are obvious, ignore those
>>2225906 - of course. none of the are the messiah, not even Q. question/research everything
>>2225926 - get back in your boz wall-e
>>2225931 - those who scream the loudest (14 and counting)
>>2225942 - in your post, you're not claiming anything other than theory, backed but thought provoking context. i enjoyed reading it. 'x' just put out a theory in his own (usual) way. like your post, it's take it or leave it. a couple outhert found it notable, because the info on the subject matter was not mention before, nothing wrong with that.
>>2225987 - tons, sadly
>>2225997 - 'x' is not real? obviously not a bot. posts once or twice every few weeks. i also don't recall 'x' ever asking to be legitimized or claiming anything at all. just drops thought provoking info and leaves. LARP to you, but not to others. READ what is written, then react accordingly. obvious kneejerk reactions to ERMEMERMGERTNERTQ, are pretty lame.