I have a pic about that.
Reminder that like islam, judaism is going to be banned from the West soon enough due to it being a supremacist ideological threat to the Western Christian culture
Hear it from a candid jew in video related 1.
Jewish ideological supremacism has ALWAYS been the psychological motivation for their group misbehavior as a people, which in turn has made them systematic targets (of well deserved (virtually every single time it happened)) of persecution has a people since the times of Abraham. See pics related 1 and 2.
Jews have always had a double standard on how they treat the goyim (word for non-jew AND cattle) compared to other fellow jews since the beginning of their history as a (ideologically supremacist) people. See the example on pic related 2. This phenomena is still pretty much alive today as we can verify when we look into the subject of jewish nepotism (nepotism which desingenious jews try to hide from the more gullible goyim/cattle with the verifiable and easily debunked myth of "jews have higher IQ than gentiles that's why they are so successful"). Pics related 3 and 4.
>Important notes:
First of all, what is a jew?
1)
A person who is of the jewish race (although many racial jews reject judaism); or
2)
A person who embraces judaism (although many religious jews are not racially jews).
>Invididuals, groups and ideologies:
Does the information above make every every muslim or religious jew a bad person? No.
Does the fact that there exist good people who are muslims or religious jews makes judaism or islam less of an ideological threat to Western civilization (Christian Western culture)? No.
>Reconcile:
There will come a time in the near future where every muslim and religious jew (be it a racial jew or non-jew) living in the West will have to choose between keep supporting an ideology which promotes supremacism and genital mutilation, or living in the West.
If they prefer being a religious jew or muslim better than supporting a sustainably safe and stable West, then great for them, GTFO of the West then.
Let us now learn a little about jewish culture and history so you can understand why judaism IS a supremacist ideology
From the book โWhen Victims Ruleโ (link to book: https://archive.is/1IEWq ):
โย ย ย In order to understand the present and prospects for the future, something must be understood about the past. Jews claim their origins to a seminal patriarch, Abraham, in the land of Ur (today part of Iraq) 4,000 years ago. Abraham was not a farmer or village member of a settled community. He was likely one of the "wandering" tribes of his time, a citizenship less, "outsider" social class known as the "Apiru," or "Habiru" (Hebrews) who were scattered across a wide area of the Middle East, from Syria to Egypt. [ANDERSON, p. 33] According to traditional Jewish religious belief, God is reputed to have singled out 75-year old Abraham among all people on earth and struck an arrangement with him, providing his progeny the consummate family inheritance:ย "If Abraham will follow the commandments of God, then He, in His turn, will make the descendants of Abraham His Chosen People and place them under His protection โฆ God at this time stipulates only one commandment, and makes only one promise." [DIMONT, p. 29] The initial agreement, by modern standards, seems extraordinarily peculiar. God's commandment was that all males by the eighth day of birth must have the foreskin of their penises cut off, a painfully literal branding of Jewish distinction around the male procreative organ:
"God โฆ said to Abraham โฆ You shall circumcise the flesh of
the foreskin and that shall be the Covenant between Me
and you."ย ย ย GENESIS:ย 17:9-13
With this physical marking, notes Barnet Litvinoff, โno male child born of Jewish parentage is ever allowed to forget he is a Jew โฆ it reminds him of the doctrine of the chosen people.โ [LITVINOFF, p. 5] "As a sign of this sacred bond, of being special seed, Chosen," note Herbert Russcol and Margarlit Banai, "The Lord of the Universe commands Abraham" to circumcize "every man child among you." And as the Torah states it: "I will establish my covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant." [RUSSCOL/BANAI, 1970, p. 173] Is this alleged commandment by God to the Abrahamic "seed" in Jewish tradition not racial?
"Circumcision," says Lawrence Hoffman, "has thus remained the sine qua non of Jewish identity throughout time. Jews came to believe that it warded off danger, and even saved Jews from damnation, that the sign of circumcision was tantamount to carrying God's ineffable name carved in the flesh, that it was a means of attaining mystical unity with the creator, and that it brought about visionary experience." [HOFFMAN, p. 11] It also symbolized, on the male genitals, special attention to the genetic continuance of the progeny of Abraham, that โ if they obeyed the laws and demands of God โ they would someday be as "numerous as the stars.""
โ
>Problems with the above facts:
1)
Circumcision is scientifically proven to cause permanent brain damage in children (pic related 1);
2)
Its a form of non-consentual religious branding;
3)
Its a barbaric form of child abuse via male genital mutilation; and
4)
The first reason it is done in the first place is to remind the jewish children that they are "God's chosen", which incites the jews to adopt a supremacist mindset toward the goyim/catle, who according to judaism are implicitly inferior due to not being jews, and thus, not part of the ones who were "chosen by God".
I think that some useful tools to counter those shills are:
1)
Lists of notable resignations;
2)
Lists of human trafficking and pedo cases arrests around the world compared to pre-Trump years;
3)
A normands frenly explanation of what happened with SA change of regime.
Go grab the test I am referring to and disprove it using the scientific method then if you want to solidify what you're trying to imply.
Extreme pain in children scars alters their brain structure (aka: brain damage), circumcision does that to children.
Doesn't mean the damage isn't there.
Doens't make the process of circumcision any less barbaric.
Doesn't make judaism any less of an idological threat to the West.
>Also:
You could just be lying. Try to not use anecdotes next time, try to use verifiable facts :)
Difference is I provide fully sourced verifiable facts.
Your anecdotes are not verifiable.
Thanks for playing jew, try to work more on your pilpul next time :)