>>22272951, >>22272962 pb
>Biden reacts 10 killed as driver plows truck into crowd
>ANGER AND FRUSTRATION
He hit the right noe here.
This is better than saying "we need more people because we're going to have so many jobs", when the current jobs numbers are terrible.
>who incurred Donald Trump's ire
by raiding his home, political persecution, treated 100% differently from the other side.
biden did worse, actual crime, but "oh he's old" so no prosecute
criminal.
>deliberate
So he just decided to blow himself up inside the truck and die of burning? Not many suicidals choose suicide by burning. Less than one in a thousand.
It glows.
>if it hits you it weighs a lot more than your car
And also the quietness is fatal
More kids run out into the road to get their ball (etc.).
>Wait till you find out whose body
Were they already dead and the truck was remotely piloted?
I need a way to save my filters and re-load them
>those cans must be as strong as that cyber truck
notable
anon discovers that the gas cans are unburned
fuckery afoot
>Shilling to cover up a bad product.
still hard to imagine the odds of a cybertruck spontaneously outside Trump Tower
many such cases
because his mission is to control the narrative. And he didn't control Q.
End of story. Anything else is clickbait
>That fuel would have gasified
nOT INSTANTLY. tHERE SHOULD BE SOME CHARRING. sOME INDICATION OF HEAT. tHOSE CANS ARE FRESH
Q's last word on Elon Musk was a bad word.
>“If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds, the diamonds must be returned.”
Then we must return "legally" to at least 1963.
All acts of government since then are null & void
LBJ's 1965 immigration fuckover, for example