Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 20, 2018, 11:53 p.m. No.2228831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8836 >>8874 >>8888 >>8927

Baker

Previous Baker ignored my Notable >>2228263 in previous bread which was seconded and/or confirmed relevant by these anons:

>>2228432

>>2228434

>>2228312

>>2228403

>>2228444

>>2228451

>>2228459

>>2228515

>>2228523

>>2228524

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 12:16 a.m. No.2228951   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8959

>>2228772

Baker

Another notable from last bread that didn't make it >>2228573

 

Cult Victim Live Chat

>>2228376

>>2228412

>>2228440

>>2228468

>>2228490

>>2228501

>>2228512

>>2228535

>>2228543

>>2228566

>>2228572

>>2228596

>>2228601

>>2228613

>>2228622

>>2228633

>>2228663

>>2228675

>>2228695

>>2228711

>>2228731

>>2228761

>>2228770

>>2228770

>>2228787

>>2228803

>>2228814

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 12:25 a.m. No.2228981   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8986 >>8998

>>2228959

Seems like they won't Note anything that links to a 3rd party information source, i.e., 4chan, or your twitter.

My guess is, removing those links from the Notable request would get it accepted.

If only Baker wasn't so covetous of his board.

Then he might realize that the hunt for Truth is what we're after.

Attempts to herd us here and block redirects elsewhere simply out of attention-whoring are not in the best interests of gaining knowledge.

Maybe that's why this board has been so dead recently.

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 12:42 a.m. No.2229054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9058 >>9068 >>9070 >>9076 >>9285

>>2229026

>>2229016

Baker is faggot

Single-highhandedly determines what ANON's determine to be notable!

After all the bullshit that's made it to notables over the breads.

But this Baker is judge, jury, and executioner after a dozen anons seconded my notable last bread.

Fuck this CIAnigger Baker

 

ANONs determine Noteworthiness, Faggot

Or this board is Fake and Gay (pic related)

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 12:57 a.m. No.2229118   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9125 >>9128 >>9132

>>2229105

Bro I approached the situation with reason and cleanly formatted and sourced posts and backed up a nomination for notable with a dozen other anons and kike baker from last bread (probably same as this bread) uses his sole discretion to veto voice of Anons. Fuck that

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 1:02 a.m. No.2229140   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9144

>>2229128

There has never been a notable that ALL anons agree on. All that's been required in many a bread is a second for a notable. It's not a fucking election. What's one person's notable is another's BS. The point of this board isn't to filter relevant (but maybe not good enough in Baker's opinion) content because Baker thinks so

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 1:20 a.m. No.2229213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9225 >>9431

So Baker has let us fill an entire bread with arguments about whether or not a couple notables should be added rather than adding them because he wants a consensus or some shit meanwhile notables about greys and shit have made it to archive.

Simultaneously the entire altnews world is digging and researching PedoWood MAJOR happenings (as stated in my and another anon's notable requests) which also happen to relate directly to Q.

But niggerKikeCIAfaggot Baker would rather offer me donuts from Soros than understand the meaning of

>>2228789

>Notables

>are not endorsements

and get this bread moving along.

 

If that doesn't say Baker is a sliding fag, or this board is comp'd, then idk what will.

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 1:29 a.m. No.2229252   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9262 >>9265 >>9269 >>9285

>>2229189

>I know for a fact the kind of stories you're telling are real.

>I'm just trying to toe a firm line to set a standard.

>I almost repeat-put in notes,

>then rethought it.

>The most important thing is to keep this platform open, free speech

>Notes should remain for mainly sourced docs.

So let me get this straight. Baker agrees and apologizes to anon who's posts he didn't put in notables. Then tells story about other posts he though were real but decided not to put in notables. Then states he believes this board should be a place for free speech. Then immediately contradicts himself by saying he reserves the right to restrict your speech if it doesn't fit his standards as "legit".

And this is a fucking board on 8chan.

Where we go to seek truth and follow any path where it leads.

No matter how speculative, yet plausible.

This baker wants it cited by CNN and Wikipedia before he'll put it in notables!

 

WTF kind of bakers are you allowing in here BO

Anonymous ID: 2e5329 July 21, 2018, 1:46 a.m. No.2229305   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2229224

> So it's just kind of creepy to see such a concerted pedo protection campaign here.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THIS

It's happening on other boards too. On other platforms. As I was saying, major Happenings tonight. Lot's being revealed. While this board is mired in dispute and off-target. fml. I only came here b/c i care for you anons. this is my home board. left other, more productive pursuits to be caught in a matter-of-principle argument w/ baker. but the board is rudderless tonight, regardless.