Baker
Previous Baker ignored my Notable >>2228263 in previous bread which was seconded and/or confirmed relevant by these anons:
>>2228432
>>2228434
>>2228312
>>2228403
>>2228444
>>2228451
>>2228459
>>2228515
>>2228523
>>2228524
Baker
Previous Baker ignored my Notable >>2228263 in previous bread which was seconded and/or confirmed relevant by these anons:
>>2228432
>>2228434
>>2228312
>>2228403
>>2228444
>>2228451
>>2228459
>>2228515
>>2228523
>>2228524
Baker
Another notable from last bread that didn't make it >>2228573
Cult Victim Live Chat
>>2228376
>>2228412
>>2228440
>>2228468
>>2228490
>>2228501
>>2228512
>>2228535
>>2228543
>>2228566
>>2228572
>>2228596
>>2228601
>>2228613
>>2228622
>>2228633
>>2228663
>>2228675
>>2228695
>>2228711
>>2228731
>>2228761
>>2228770
>>2228770
>>2228787
>>2228803
>>2228814
Seems like they won't Note anything that links to a 3rd party information source, i.e., 4chan, or your twitter.
My guess is, removing those links from the Notable request would get it accepted.
If only Baker wasn't so covetous of his board.
Then he might realize that the hunt for Truth is what we're after.
Attempts to herd us here and block redirects elsewhere simply out of attention-whoring are not in the best interests of gaining knowledge.
Maybe that's why this board has been so dead recently.
Baker in previous bread and this one are comp'd.
You'll see for yourself if you post/lurk here long enough.
Q hasn't come back for a reason.
Baker is faggot
Single-highhandedly determines what ANON's determine to be notable!
After all the bullshit that's made it to notables over the breads.
But this Baker is judge, jury, and executioner after a dozen anons seconded my notable last bread.
Fuck this CIAnigger Baker
ANONs determine Noteworthiness, Faggot
Or this board is Fake and Gay (pic related)
Not wasting my time arguing with a faggot nigger cunt baker to get a notable posted that a dozen anons agreed with.
This place is done.
Bro I approached the situation with reason and cleanly formatted and sourced posts and backed up a nomination for notable with a dozen other anons and kike baker from last bread (probably same as this bread) uses his sole discretion to veto voice of Anons. Fuck that
There has never been a notable that ALL anons agree on. All that's been required in many a bread is a second for a notable. It's not a fucking election. What's one person's notable is another's BS. The point of this board isn't to filter relevant (but maybe not good enough in Baker's opinion) content because Baker thinks so
kek
So Baker has let us fill an entire bread with arguments about whether or not a couple notables should be added rather than adding them because he wants a consensus or some shit meanwhile notables about greys and shit have made it to archive.
Simultaneously the entire altnews world is digging and researching PedoWood MAJOR happenings (as stated in my and another anon's notable requests) which also happen to relate directly to Q.
But niggerKikeCIAfaggot Baker would rather offer me donuts from Soros than understand the meaning of
>Notables
>are not endorsements
and get this bread moving along.
If that doesn't say Baker is a sliding fag, or this board is comp'd, then idk what will.
>I know for a fact the kind of stories you're telling are real.
>I'm just trying to toe a firm line to set a standard.
>I almost repeat-put in notes,
>then rethought it.
>The most important thing is to keep this platform open, free speech
>Notes should remain for mainly sourced docs.
So let me get this straight. Baker agrees and apologizes to anon who's posts he didn't put in notables. Then tells story about other posts he though were real but decided not to put in notables. Then states he believes this board should be a place for free speech. Then immediately contradicts himself by saying he reserves the right to restrict your speech if it doesn't fit his standards as "legit".
And this is a fucking board on 8chan.
Where we go to seek truth and follow any path where it leads.
No matter how speculative, yet plausible.
This baker wants it cited by CNN and Wikipedia before he'll put it in notables!
WTF kind of bakers are you allowing in here BO
I understand the annoyance, but it's a matter of principle. So I apologize to other anons, but not Baker
> So it's just kind of creepy to see such a concerted pedo protection campaign here.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS
It's happening on other boards too. On other platforms. As I was saying, major Happenings tonight. Lot's being revealed. While this board is mired in dispute and off-target. fml. I only came here b/c i care for you anons. this is my home board. left other, more productive pursuits to be caught in a matter-of-principle argument w/ baker. but the board is rudderless tonight, regardless.