dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

>>22308639, >>22308858, >>22308993 (You) Meta FB is going to make Freedom of speech changes to the bad, bad, bad, computerPN

My notes and comments from listening to Kaplan on Fox interview, its all about the Tech trillions coming:

Title:The Big Tech Scam

>>22308993 (You)

He says restore "free expression "NOT" Free Speech"

There's always been free expression there, it doesn't mean you won't get penalties

Listen to the words he uses

>>22308993 (You)

Fox misleads with headlines, its NOT Free Speech, even Kaplan speaking on there says "Free Expression" a lot.They are trying to fake people out. How about they stop shadow banning and all the other tech manipulation. Kaplan said we found people want to talk about immigration, Trans and Sex issues. Strange to name such bizarre priorities they have. Are those the only three they'll not censor. What about child and human trafficking, porn, drugs sold on the platform, terrorists allowed there etc

I don't believe a word they say, they are part of the IC community, its not going to change much. They are being devious,when they all repeat the same words, they are being specific. He does not say META is implementing free speech even once.

>>22308993 (You)

Why does he only refer to META and not Facebook?

>>22308993 (You)

Damn, Kaplan never usesthe words "Free Speech" he only uses "Free Expression", only Fox is asking about free speech,he never correct's them. But he's obviously avoiding the words "Free speech" probably doing that so they can't be sued for violating constitutionally protected free speech

>>22309077 (You)

He even says Trump wants "free expression", I've never heard Trump say "free expression", only "Free speech and First Amendment". Kaplan uses that phrase 7-9 times+ through the interview.

Anons can we decode exactly what he's saying. He mentions the "First Amendment, once, that are violated by foreign countries. Not US companies

>>22309077 (You)

He admits META enacted because President Trump is focused on technology, in the next decade+so META wants to get in on the moneymaking of AI etc, so this is their offer or exchange to the public and Trump, to be included in Trillions more

So does that mean Musk tramped down on free speech on X,so he can offer to remove it for more contracts, like META is doing, with the government?

>>22309256

I'd like to get the transcript of the Fox video

Anonymous ID: bb14e5 Jan. 7, 2025, 8:37 a.m. No.22309319 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9373

>>22309256

Kaplan doesn't answer the question, "are you only doing this for Trump's four year term, or will you permanently do this? He says, "look this a good opportunity for us", like that has anything to do with the question.

He hardly answers a direct question

>>22309319

He says, Musk started the "free expression" and he did a great job", right after Musk bans free speech.

So is he saying like Musk we can give you "free speech and also, take it away anytime we like"

So the goal here is to get government contracts for tech and AI, this is there opening offer. Trump should counter and ask for the exact policies related to this, fix them and give them the order to make it permanent, to be included in the Tech Boom.

None of these companies honor the 1st Amendment. So the people shouldn't get excited for this puny offer, to let us speak.

>>22309256

He's asked "what is your largest age bracket" is it teens, because they were talking about teens and younger children. He says "well we have 3 billion people around the world, so we are taking care"!The fucker won't answer the question, because they know teens are more programmable, and if they reveal teens are their biggest audience, governments will push more laws.

Zuckerberg admits Biden admin pushed for censorship online

Constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley provides analysis of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's announcement,where he highlighted a focus on free speechand admitted the Biden administration pressured the company into censorship

Why is FOX saying Meta is allowing "Free Speech", when he only said "Free Expression" and NEVER said Anything else. He mentioned the First Amendment 2x but never quoted what it is.Murdochs are trying to program the public these companies can be trusted. We should see how much META ramped up commercials there for money to Fox.

It's utter bullshit that Meta started censoring when Bidan forced them, they've been doing it forever. I posted on FB, "America is the land of the free and home of the brave" in late 2016, and I got a warning to take it down.

Markie making excuses that it was only Bidan, but we know as a fact Obama started it to ramped it up.(they are talk like programmed bots).

Many journalists pointed out at the time, Mark was using that and its bullshit. All IC agencies WW give them orders, its not at the president level, its the NWO.

4:28

https://youtu.be/oMrjU3iRcFo

>>22309538

Turley says the tech companies resisted Free Speech for years and never resisted stopping free speech years. We all love a redemptive sinner, but Zuck is not being honest. They willingly took part if this for many years before Bidan.

Fox's quote on the title below is inaccurate to say the least, if you listen to Turley, that's not exactly what he says!

"Constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley provides analysis of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's announcement, where he highlighted a focus on free speech and admitted the Biden administration pressured the company into censorship"

>>22309589

I guess Turley had to tow the line because he doesn't point out Kaplan never said Free Speech, only Free Expression. I know Turley must have heard that phrase over and over in the interview.This is not a revolution like he said, its a scam when they never use "Free Speech"

Peter Doocy: Why was this done secretly?

The Biden White House announced the transfer of 11 Guantanamo Bay detainees to Oman. The White House is also reportedly in talks to swap an additional GITMO prisoner for three Americans held in Afghanistan. Fox News' Peter Doocy reports the latest.

PS: Trump eliminated Obama's EO to shut down Gitmo asap when he got in 2017. So Bidan's order can be reversed. Plus Obama had ordered 40 (i think) and they had not been released by the time Trump got in, so they weren't released. Trump released about 16 after it was reviewed. And Trump has poured millions and millions into upgrades in Gitmo starting in 2018. No way Bidan will get away with this shit.