Anonymous ID: 08a5e1 July 21, 2018, 12:49 p.m. No.2232969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2988 >>3010 >>3276

>>2232942

Shits gets weird when you start traversing dimensions in terms of hue shifts.

 

How are you handling time?

Newton/Einstein/Classic Physics or Non-Euclidean Geometry in which time and energy are non-concepts.

 

Like… look at red light and green light.

How are they put together to create yellow?

If you look at the waveforms, physics doesn't have an explanation for how to combine them.

The math doesn't work/doesn't produce the correct waves on a graph.

Anonymous ID: 08a5e1 July 21, 2018, 12:54 p.m. No.2233007   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2232988

sure but how are you representing an axis 4D or above?

 

The numbers associated with the waveforms throughout the spectrum do not mathematically compound into the values necessary to produce the light we expect, according to the physics models.

 

Their approach is incorrect, but they don't bother themselves with that since to jump into the different math throws all sorts of shit into a blender.

Anonymous ID: 08a5e1 July 21, 2018, 12:57 p.m. No.2233035   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3084

>>2233010

"mixture"… how?

Addition? Multiplication? Some batshit (log) function?

 

Would the base color/wavelengths be made up of "mixtures" of wavelengths in the spectra below them?

What's the base for all this? What are the "pure" wavelengths? What's our Planck/constant, here?

Anonymous ID: 08a5e1 July 21, 2018, 1:07 p.m. No.2233115   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3133 >>3141

>>2233084

What is a photon? Where is it? When is it?

How does it move?

In a Ray?

A wave?

A spherical pulse?

 

Is a photon constant?

When it's a part… wave… pulse…

Are all photons the same "color"?

 

What are you actually "seeing"?