Anonymous ID: 956b25 July 21, 2018, 1:33 p.m. No.2233317   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3355 >>3363 >>3369 >>3380 >>3399 >>3408 >>3513 >>3612 >>3670

Anons:

 

Last bread an anon posted that searching google for "IMG SRC" returned pedo images.

I gawked and laughed at that, because it would have to be a inside manipulation to the HTML coding to return a specific type of image based on that search, as "IMG SRC" is an html command very common in every web page served…

 

Well, I hate to report that it DOES return specifically pedo-creepy images.

I sadly had to prove it.

 

Would like to nominate that NOTABLE

because it requires special manipulation of the google image results to allow this to happen.

 

Let me be clear:

THE GOOGLE ALGORITHM MUST BE OVERRIDDEN FOR THIS ANOMALY TO OCCUR.

 

Programming and codingfags chime in.

 

Let's put it on record.

 

(back to lurkmode)

Anonymous ID: 956b25 July 21, 2018, 1:42 p.m. No.2233397   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2233380

I tested "img src" with google and startpage (which uses google results.)

I think duck duck uses results compiled from google also?Not sure.

I am not willing to search on all search engines for this, kinda creepy and I am on work network.