>>2233138

^^^^^^^^

>>2233241

>>2233267

>>2233317

what the hell anon.. it does.

any voatfags/googfags here to conirm it was not brought up before on chans?

concerning >>2233317

>>2233481

thats my conclusion after little browsing, don't think it overrides any globalgos

anyway, very specific imagery, half of it gross or nude - is it a childrens board or maybe some fuckery left after pizza cleanup months ago?