Anonymous ID: 5230c2 Jan. 10, 2025, 8:44 a.m. No.22329293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9297 >>9453

 

==Grooming gangs commit two sex offences a day, first figures reveal

Data from all forces in England and Wales find 572 child ‘grooming’ crimes in first nine months of 2024==

Charles Hymas

Home Affairs Editor

10 January 2025 6:00am GMT

Grooming gangs are behind almost two child sexual abuse offences a day reported to police, the first analysis of its kind has revealed.

Data from all 43 forces in England and Wales show there were 717 child sexual exploitation “grooming” crimes recorded by police in 2023 and 572 in the first nine months of 2024.

The figures were revealed through the first national police scheme to collect and analyse police-recorded “group-based” child sexual abuse, including the ethnic background of perpetrators.

The “Hydrant Programme” was set up by police after criticism by Alexis Jay’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse of the “widespread failure” to collect “good quality” data on the abusers, victims and the offences.

Her 2022 report warned that failure to provide accurate data had contributed to a “one-sided and often uninformed debate” about the ethnic backgrounds of perpetrators – and hampered the pursuit of offenders and support for victims.

Fury over grooming gangs has reignited in recent weeks after Labour blocked an inquiry into the scandal.

Anonymous ID: 5230c2 Jan. 10, 2025, 8:44 a.m. No.22329297   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9453

>>22329293

>Grooming gangs commit two sex offences a day, first figures reveal Data from all forces in England and Wales find 572 child ‘grooming’ crimes in first nine months of 2024

 

Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, was head of the Crown Prosecution Service at the height of the scandal in Oldham, Greater Manchester. He has come under fire for his party’s refusal to back a national inquiry into grooming gangs.

Keir Starmer QC, the director of public prosecutions,

Sir Keir Starmer was the director of public prosecutions at the height of the scandal Credit: Lewis Whyld/PA

3.7pc of offences ‘group-based’

The new analysis shows that “group-based” offending – defined as involving two or more individuals – accounted for 4,228 offences, or 3.7 per cent of all 115,489 child sexual abuse and exploitation crimes, including those online, in 2023.

Of these 4,228, 17 per cent – or 717 – were “grooming gang” cases involving child sexual exploitation. Cases where two or more people within a family were abusing children accounted for 26 per cent of the group-based offences.

Investigators have also uncovered a significant proportion of “other” cases which includes child sexual abuse committed by other children – a phenomenon that police believe has been fuelled by pornography on the internet and growing online lifestyles of young people.

The majority of perpetrators – 83 per cent – were white, while some 7 per cent were defined as Asian, 5 per cent as black and 3 per cent as mixed race.

However, police admitted the breakdown was “limited” and had to be treated with caution. The breakdown only covered 34 per cent of suspects because ethnicity can only be recorded once they have been interviewed by police and confirmed their ethnic background.

Readers on the grooming gang inquiry

 

Richard Fewkes, the director of the Hydrant Programme, said the data suggested the profile of offenders reflected the overall ethnic mix of the UK population.

He told The Telegraph: “In very general terms, what we see across all group based offending is that no particular ethnicity stands out based on population data.”

Mr Fewkes said police forces accepted that they had allowed “cultural sensitivities” in the past to impede investigations but he said it was “absolutely not” the case now.

He added: “Our point is that wherever a child is at threat, wherever a child has been abused, that response should be robust right the way across the board, whoever’s committed it, whatever colour their skin, whatever religion they are, the policing response should be robust.”

Historically, police forces and prosecutors often failed to take action against groomers, who have been primarily of British-Pakistani origin, amid fears they would be branded racist or Islamophobic.

Sir Keir addressed this failing in 2012 when he was the director of public prosecutions, saying: “In a number of cases presented to us, particularly in cases involving groups, there’s clearly an issue of ethnicity that has to be understood and addressed. As prosecutors we shouldn’t shy away from that.”

‘Gangs’ focus could have negative impact on victims

However, Mr Fewkes warned that the focus on “grooming gangs” – which accounted for a minority of offences even within group-based child sexual abuse – could have a negative impact on victims of other types of offending who might be deterred from coming forward.

He said: “We hear it directly from victims and survivors.

“Because if, let’s say, you are a victim of child sexual abuse within a family setting, which is our biggest threat, and you hear the narrative and the priority pushed by statutory agencies, and its focus is in one particular area, that has the impact of you thinking, ‘Well, I’m probably not going to be listened to because I’m not a priority.’”

He also warned that unbalanced mass media coverage was “triggering” memories for many victims “because it is in essence bringing back to the fore their trauma from the abuse”.

Earlier this week, Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, opened the door to a specific inquiry on child grooming should victims want one, saying “nothing is off the table”.

It emerged a week ago that Ms Phillips had refused to back an inquiry into abuse in Oldham, prompting Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader, to call for a national inquiry.

On Wednesday, MPs voted by 364 to 111 against the demand, fuelling accusations from the Tories that Sir Keir had committed an “act of cowardice”.

 

PB

https://gab.com/CllrBSilvester/posts/113804080047481656

Anonymous ID: 5230c2 Jan. 10, 2025, 9:16 a.m. No.22329453   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9459 >>9854 >>9999

>>22329293

>>22329297

 

Criminal justice, police powers, and human rights

 

by

Starmer, Keir, 1962-

 

Publication date

2001

 

Topics

Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998, Criminal justice, Administration of Great Britain, Police power Great Britain, Human rights – Great Britain

 

Publisher

London : Blackstone Press

Anonymous ID: 5230c2 Jan. 10, 2025, 9:25 a.m. No.22329485   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22329459

 

he reaction of UK Black Lives Matter to this comment was to dismiss Starmer as just ‘a cop in an expensive suit’.[6] This was an incisive and memorable response. But it’s interesting to note that Starmer’s comment is in striking contrast to what he said back in 1986 when writing about police attacks on pickets during the printers’ bitter dispute with Rupert Murdoch over his Wapping print plant.

 

Back then, according to Starmer’s former Highgate housemate, ‘he used to run an organisation

 

called Socialist Alternatives from our house. [7] Socialist Alternatives was the publication of the British section of the pro-self-management, ex-Trotskyist group, the International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency, and Starmer’s contributions to the magazine included an article about the Wapping dispute in which he denounced the use of ‘paramilitary’ policing methods. He then said:

 

This leads to the question of the role the police should play, if any, in civil society. Who are they protecting and from what?

 

[8]

 

Starmer’s comments appear to raise the issue of abolishing the police not just defunding them. According to one of his old lawyer friends, back in 1986, Starmer also advocated a ‘thorough critique of the prison system and how it didn’t work.’[9]

 

This suggests that, in his youth, Starmer thought it was, at least, possible to create a society which did not require the threat of police and prisons to maintain social relations. Indeed, in Socialist Alternatives, the young Starmer wrote earnestly about the creation of a ‘self-managing socialism’ that would be ‘based on democratic control of production for “use” rather than “profit”.’[10]

 

Starmer’s subsequent depressing trajectory from ‘Marxist’ radical to cynical careerist is not uncommon on the British left. One of his own top advisers, Simon Fletcher, used to belong to the Trotskyist group, Socialist Action.[11] And even Boris Johnson has an adviser, Munira Mirza, who is herself closely associated with the ex-Trotskyists of the former Revolutionary Communist Party.[12]

 

What is less common is Starmer’s trajectory from a lawyer who genuinely supported left-wing activism to one who became head of the Crown Prosecution Service — an organisation whose only interest in such activism is a determination to contain and prevent it.

 

https://archive.org/details/keir-starmer-from-marxist-to-cop-in-an-expensive-suit-mark-kosman/mode/2up?q=keir+starmer&view=theater

Anonymous ID: 5230c2 Jan. 10, 2025, 10:07 a.m. No.22329723   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22329296

>>22329534

>>22329566

>>22329666

461

Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/04/2018 00:54:28 ID: aaefa5

8chan/pol: 11115887

What makes a movie GOOD?

GREAT actors?

Q

 

TT25167

[Profile picture from source site (X Post/Truth Social)] Donald J. Trump / @realDonaldTrump 01/09/2025 20:02:54

ID: Not Available

Truth Social: 113801361784208511

 

I appreciate the time and effort of the United States Supreme Court in trying to remedy the great injustice done to me by the highly conflicted“Acting Justice,” who should not have been allowed to try this case. Every Legal Scholar stated, unequivocally, that this is a case that should never have been brought. There was no case against me. In other words, I am innocent of all of the Judge’s made up, fake charges. This was nothing other than Weaponization of our Justice System against a Political Opponent. It’s called Lawfare, and nothing like this has ever happened in the United States of America, and it should never be allowed to happen again. To this day, this highly political and corrupt Judge has put a gag order on me, which takes away my First Amendment right to speak about very important aspects of the case. For the sake and sanctity of the Presidency, I will be appealing this case, and am confident that JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL. The pathetic, dying remnants of the Witch Hunts against me will not distract us as we unite and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!