Anonymous ID: 3115f2 Jan. 10, 2025, 5:08 p.m. No.22331922   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1931 >>1959

>>22331827

>>22331834

>And the near-simultaneous ignition of multiple fires

Any near-simultaneous ignition of multiple fires would create a pattern, Anon. Any three would create a triangle. Four a quadrilateral, etc. What significance does an alleged pattern viewed from space (or aircraft) attain compared to discovering three agents driving around to set fires at pre-determined times to take advantage of environmental conditions?

Anonymous ID: 3115f2 Jan. 10, 2025, 5:20 p.m. No.22332039   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2054

>>22331959

The only actionable significance from a legal or intelligence perspective is the simultaneous nature of the ignitions at diverse locations. This alone is actionable. Faggots are forever touching themselves while seeing the insignificant.

Anonymous ID: 3115f2 Jan. 10, 2025, 5:32 p.m. No.22332154   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2181

>>22332103

It has been a simple conversation, Anon. An exchange of ideas in the arena of ideas. Anon holds no appointments. The inferiority of your ideas, arguments, and abilities has obviously eroded your self-esteem and caused you to label your perceived opponent using ad-hominem as a last resort. Sad.

Anonymous ID: 3115f2 Jan. 10, 2025, 5:39 p.m. No.22332215   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22332181

Would you care to argue that the patterns created by wildfire arson are more significant legally (or to an intelligence analyst) than the fact that multiple simultaneous fire origins are basic evidence of a criminal conspiracy or enemy action?