everyone has heard of our skeletal ancestors.
millions of years old even.
much population attention on filling the gaps.
has popular media talked about ancestors,
less than a million years old?
maybe a way to understand what is missing, without math…
draw a circle, divide it into 12 parts.
label the parts with zodiac constellation names in sequence.
what age is now ending and which is beginning?
place a mark on the circle.
where is year 0? mark it too on the circle.
what religions were dominant before and after year 0?
label them on the circle.
label the same before and after those.
is there a gradient of simplicity or complexity?
how do the principles change along the gradient?
with the principles in mind.
what is the opposite of year zero?
can you extend the gradient to that point?
with familiarity of the gods (greek, egyptian, roman and other previous pagan deities),
note the change of these from the past to present. non-human/human.
the change in societal/cultural governing structures?
when was the younger dryas?
label this on the circle.
what is opposite on the circle?
label this as well.
are the two events visible?
if so, the beginnings of a foundation for all,
that was,
is,
and to be,
is gained.
will this be understood?
depends on how much of the circle is labeled.
the cyrcle spirals back through time,
from now to the first skeletal ancestor and beyond.
hopefully a useful contrasting perspective.
unrelated note:
apologies for the previous moral trigger. :)