Anonymous ID: 69f9b2 July 21, 2018, 3:43 p.m. No.2234452   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2234436

In United States House of Representatives v. Price (2016), Judge Collyer first found the House had standing to sue the Obama Administration and, then, found that the Administration had unconstitutionally spent billions of Treasury funds on health insurer subsidies without a Congressional appropriation.[6] Judge Collyer enjoined any further insurer reimbursements without a valid appropriation, but stayed her order pending appeal.[7]

 

On April 20, 2017 Landmark Legal Foundation filed a Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae and for En Banc Order Directing Investigation with Judge Collyer which requested the Court under her oversight exercise its inherent authority to protect the administration of justice and the integrity of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process by issuing an order directing an investigation into the apparent unlawful leaking of surveillance activity conducted in accordance with the rulings of the Court."[8][9]

 

In response, Judge Collyer responded to the Motion in an Order dated April 24, 2017 that denied the request for leave with the stated rationale that there was no matter pending before the Court in which appearance would be proper.[10][9]

 

Mark Levin, constitutional attorney and board member of Landmark Legal Foundation responded as reported by Fox News Insider on March 1, 2018. He stated that judges on the FISA court should be scrutinized. Mr. Levin stated that Judge Collyer has the power to hold the applicants for the FISA warrants subject of the Motion in contempt for misdirecting the Court, and that he was disappointed FISA judges such as Judge Collyer had not held those applicants accountable for their misdirection, even after providing the Court with evidence. Mr. Levin stated the FISA court should not consist of current federal judges and that it should be abolished.[11]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemary_M._Collyer