Anonymous ID: 9c63e3 Jan. 31, 2018, 9:21 a.m. No.223596   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4051

>>223571

I would hardly call that corruption defeated. Corruption identifiedโ€ฆ. But one slipped through the CN boss that died same week was tied to U1. There has been no arrests, and no connections to the liberals yet, though their well should be very easily. No, I don't agree corruption was defeated at all. I think corruption was noticed. nothing more.

Anonymous ID: 9c63e3 Jan. 31, 2018, 9:32 a.m. No.223768   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>223755

>n , so that guy paid with his life as a distraction. That's fucked up.

You don't even know that's true. he could have been dead in advance, you are really gonna get emotional about someone you don't even know, or even the circumstances of their death? Are you for real? Fuck off.

Anonymous ID: 9c63e3 Jan. 31, 2018, 9:40 a.m. No.223878   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3917

>>223833

NO COINCIDENCES. If you still think things just 'happen' at this frequency you're a fucking retard. Strait up. I move to assuming it's the clowns, then if the evidence is against it, then so be it. Assuming it's innocent is what got us into this problem with a subversive group in the first place, assuming people are good. BAD FUCKING ASSUMPTION, JUST LIKE ASSUMING THIS IS JUST AN ACCIDENT.

 

Fucking braindead stupid actually.

Anonymous ID: 9c63e3 Jan. 31, 2018, 9:47 a.m. No.223951   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3966

>>223917

 

We're no-where near normies. Hence, no need to assume 'coincidence' considering Q says no co-incidences, which I firmly believe. IF you think this was an 'accident' you're plain dumb. Assume evil, then prove it false, not the other way around.

Anonymous ID: 9c63e3 Jan. 31, 2018, 9:49 a.m. No.223981   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>223966

WHO SAID PUSH THAT TO NORMIES?? I said Assume evil first, then if it proves out false, then so be it, not the other way around.

Wait til we know to tell normies, but stop please stop pushing coincidences here, especially stuff this obvious.