And that is the problem that Democrats have. It's not "who's the best person for the job?" it's "OK, whose turn is it now?"
She has a degree from Boston University in economics and international relations and doesn't understand that Palestine is not, nor has it ever been a "country." Nor does she understand how unemployment is calculated. That means BU is a fucking diploma mill.
The basis for this application is REDACTED. Apparently all the government has to say is "we promise we're telling you the truth" and it's "here's your surveillance warrant." I mean, I knew that, but this makes it very real. Reading it, Source #1 sounds incredible. That's because Source #1 is Steele. So that would make sense. I can't fuckin believe a judge would approve surveillance based on this shit.
Read page 308. About FBI parting ways with Source #1 aka Steele. It then ends with saying that the FBI believes he's credible. Hookers pissing on "Candidate #1," that's credible?
She (unknowingly) makes an excellent public case for abolishing the Department of Education, or at least student loan programs, and letting universities and colleges collapse under their own weight (of bloated bureaucracy). Make these bastards compete in a true free market.
Oh jfc has anyone seen this new Marie Osmond shit with Nutrisystem to send in a fucking DNA sample? I just saw a commercial for that. First time. Osmonds, Mkultra, Branson.
Believe #1 is Trump based on some of the language. Warrant says Candidate #1 campaign tried to distance itself from Page, that Page worked for Candidate #1, etc.
Also saw that "Telo Years" or whatever the fuck is doing ancestry testing. Must have needed a larger amount of genetic material than what's required to test telomeres.
That also works. Thank you, anon.
>They were using lies to call the truth a lie?
How does one refute the truth? With a pack of lies, of course. Yes, the entire fuckin thing is a crock of shit. Lies made to cover truth.
Releasing the redacted warrants is a HUGE step. This is going along very nicely. Public outrage ensues. Another step toward total declassification.
No. They have dick authority to do so and it would be a violation of a helluva lot of statute and ethics to do that sua sponte. On their own accord.