>>2234668

Why are the date signatures different?

This looks like 2 or 3 different people signing it.

I think Strzok is the first one, but the others are definitely different people.

#2 and #3 look like a woman.

>>2234824

>>2234842

This.

Did Strzok get someone else to perjure themselves?

>>2234806

>The basis for this application is REDACTED.

>>2234808

Page and Manafort

Playing devil's advocate, if Page and Manafort were both plants, they both may have similar comms and laundering behavior.

We saw that Manafort was still doing shady transactions post firing (and post election) to help feed the muh RUssia narrative for impeachment.

So perhaps the later FISA (especially the last one) are related to that…

>>2234901

>DOSSIER REFERENCE

DIfferent dossier.

In typical fashion, they are projecting their crimes onto the other side.

Candidate #2 was Hillary.

They are saying Russia was offering a dossier on HRC.

>>2234945

So #2 and #3 are the same agent.

#1 is Strzok.

#4 is someone else.

Was #4 done by a different agent, approved by a different AG, and for a different purpose?

ie, to prove Page was a Plant?

>>2234962

>wait how do we know which candidate is which???

Read it.

It says in application #2 that Candidate #1 won the Presidency.

>>2234941

>>2234953

>>2234960

Page denial

My guess is the redacted information contains some contra-evidence (like, from Fusion GPS).

The fuckers used Page's denial against him.

Probably to underscore their opinion he's a liar.

They were using lies to call the truth a lie?

>>2235026

>So Zerohedge says that the people who signed the various FISA Warrant Applications were:

Did they ALL have to sign?

Or any single ONE of them could sign?

Do we know the EO that Obama signed outlining this?

>>2235052

>Pentagon has released $200M in new security assistance to Ukraine

Money to Ukraine

Obvious timing is obvious

The essence of the warrant on Page is that the GOP changed their position on giving money to Ukraine.

Now they just did it… blowing up the FBI narrative.

>>2235075

The '2' is less loopy.

They used a '6' instead of 'June'

There is a small line visible by the 'p' in supervisor (in 2 and 3) that suggests the person has a 'q' or 'p' (or 'j') in their first name.

>>2235106

My assumption is that either could sign it.

Yates had to take the bullet, as the price for a future with the party.

>>2235137

>Releasing the redacted warrants is a HUGE step.

Are the FISA applications different?

Nunes has speculated the FISA's are different.

If any of the judges see this release, and they KNOW what they approved is different, could they release the court's version?

>>2235218

>2 more FISA warrants were approved after Comey got canned.

NO.

Comey signed the first 3.

McCabe signed the last one, after Comey was canned.