>>22361941

Imagine, baker, if there were no deletions of spam, breads would race by and we'd have none of this tiresome multi-hour breads to suffer through. Something to consider.

I imagine this is the rationale behind the hated bread locking - please migrate fiasco favoured by current admin.

Anon confesses to filtering every iteration of VD spam faggot and side by side cubicle colleagues, which removes hundreds of posts during bread at times. Why can't admin do the same?

Is the spamming really that pernicious and dangerous?

>>22362022

>>22362027

Your post is a perfect exemplification.

>>22362032

>They want vatifag in the bread.

Dunno about that, but I am certain that pigfag is their pet!

>>22362028

Will the real John Fetterman please stand up. please stand up?

>>22362045

>Shills love to fill breads quickly,

You prefer 7 hr breads?

What does it matter if shills fill breads quickly?

Are anons not astute enough to filter the wheat from the chaff?

My discussions with BO would suggest BO takes all anons as retards unable to discern wheat from chaff.

>>22362045

>Shills love to fill breads quickly, helps shove them all the way into the archives where things get forgotten

Ah, now comes the rationale for repeating notables ad nauseum.

>>22362062

>Can't, he been gitmo'ed.

If RRN was true, anon would blow so many spurts of freedom cum daily.

>>22362108

> pushed into Previously Collected that is rarely looked at

Isn't the idea of notables to skim the cream from each bread?

Your post makes no sense and appears to be attempting to legitimise the actions of the current admin - very poorly, may I add?

>>22362128

> when the breads are flying.

Do you have data to back this bs claim up?

When are breads flying sans deletions?

Anon remembers flying breads when Q posted. When not, not so much! Maybe during Trump rallies when bakers notabled every syllable Trump uttered, otherwise, meh!

>>22362128

Your justificaticationfu is weak!

>>22362164

>DOARfaggotry

You missed my previous condemnation of slackjack?

Anon abhorred slackjack, DOAR and Baker union.

Anon became an ex-baker under slackjack's mismanagement. Tried again under current admin and gave up when it became apparent that anon did not share the same philosophy as current admin, who protect their position.

Anon is anon and proudly supports anon's positions.

When anon's voice is suppressed and freedom of speech, whether anon agrees or not, is suppressed, anon balks.

Where is the line between freedom of speech here and deletion and suppression?

Just to pre-empt your fake and ghey response, anon does not support nor condone VD shill faggot nor the current famefags so loved and protected by current admin.

>>22362289

>"we are the news now"

Yeah, that's what they claim and then repeat MSM newsbites.

>>22362045

>Would allow the garbage to remain

And the danger of this is what?

Are we not flooded with garbage everyday from the MSM which ends up in notables?

Answer truly!

>>22362062

I'll excuse your grammar. Sure, he could have been, however…

>>22362045

>Why be in a hurry to go through a bread?

Why lock a bread when you have wanker's cramp after so many deletions?

>>22362312

>any baker can become Reporter to make threads

And?

Ask not why anon is an ex baker for the answer may not please.

>>22362402

is this justification for repetition for ad nauseum repetition, or is there an agenda for posts notabled?

With anon being condemned, anon is forced to ask why?