>>2235998 {pb, like 2-3 breads ago}
Baker <3
I think this post [was]
Notable
Simply because the last page shows that 'officially' all the stuff in the document is pretense: Page's 'file' has documented evidence of an in-depth FBI investigation, but since no charges surfaced directly from these documents, which is evidence for our purposes as well, we can surmise that the release of these documents is so far in the past it's merely a crumb at this point.
The point is: Everyone reading into this FBI drop[or anything for this purpose] needs to realize how far ahead the process is[both sides], in terms of progress, compared to our 'realization' of what they know. There is SO much more we don't know about all this.
All we can do is sit back and watch in wait. I know we're all cats with wiggle butt on everything that surfaces, but there's nothing to pounce on until we catch up on intel.
Trust, it seems, is all we have anymore. Just remember who you and what you care about before making any decisions.
-----
This is a repost.
Extra comments:
<Pics related
<Just look at the dates on the first few signatures in the FBI dump. Those are just the first couple examples. All the other dates in there are Oct. '16- Jun. 17'. The fact that the different phases of the investigation were COMPLETE at/before the dates signed for shows how long they knew about it- When was it public? 2017. If the FBI was really investigating this guy for something that happened in June 2016, and signed the official docs affirming their findings, starting in October 2016, for something regarding the ELECTION.... why did the Senate only push a subpoena in Oct '17?
that is the question...