Anonymous ID: 1d3c7d Jan. 19, 2025, 3:52 p.m. No.22384263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22384224

unreal

Let's hope the midnight light shines on them.

Maybe the news will arrive in the morning?

Wonder how long 9/11 perps tortured their patsy on Gitmo?

Sheesh.

No wonder they all us the NAZI

By the book Propaganda.

Anonymous ID: 1d3c7d Jan. 19, 2025, 4:10 p.m. No.22384389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4418

>>22383234

>>22383697

>>22383016 pb

https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1881128993409114164

just wrote ^

"Typically the Propagandist will just make a sketch, with not too much detail.

 

Notice how FakeNews never fills in too many close details, about Trump's trials, about his alleged character. That's on purpose.

 

They leave it up to people's imagination, which is so much more powerful."

 

And then found this in Julie Kelly post from a Dem Public defender describing how the j6 Prosecution blurred the evidence when they tried the J6-ers; they used Propaganda techniques to charge, indict an convict!:

 

On Pardon Eve, I want to share texts to me recently from a J6 public defender. She attended the Women’s March in 2017 and is a lifelong Dem as are most public defenders.

 

“My reaction to these prosecutions is not political. DOJ is out of control when prosecuting J6 and police officers. They’ve turned me into a Trump supporter.”

 

More on DOJ abuses.

 

“The whole theory of prosecution was the ‘raindrop’ theory by Judge Kollar Kotelly. If you were present you contributed to everything that happened. Judges let cops who had no contact with individual defendant testify about how they were impeded or obstructed generally without tying it to particular defendant.

 

Gov theory of prosecution in most cases is not individualized. It’s as if in a drug case, you allowed testimony generally about scourges of drugs without tying it to particular defendant. Just because fentanyl kills doesn’t mean someone should be able to testify about effect if fentanyl that the defendant didn’t sell. Compounds the problem of jurors who hate J6 defendants.

 

Disparate & selective enforcement is a real problem. No recognition of First Amendment interests. And the imprisonment of defendants charged merely with misdemeanors is disgraceful.

 

So many people entered Capitol after others had opened doors. Or when cops stepped aside.

 

Big issue is how they use texts & social media posts as evidence of conspiracy, of violent intent, of intent to interfere. No recognition that people post or resend a lot of stuff on social media without giving much thought. Even anti-masking statements are used as evidence of guilty intent.

 

Statements questioning election security or commenting on irregularities or critical of mail-in ballots get admitted as evidence of guilt. These statements are at the core of First Amendment protection.

 

You cannot get a fair trial in a district that votes 90%+ liberal DEM even in 2024.

 

Also, some Capitol Police Officers were allowed to testify how they felt that day; that they feared they wouldn’t get home to their spouses. Just playing to jurors’ sympathies where jurors were already unsympathetic; a few of them even teared up. Cops never do that. IMHO gov also played the race card whenever they could; or insinuated it.”

Anonymous ID: 1d3c7d Jan. 19, 2025, 4:13 p.m. No.22384418   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22384389

 

"Big issue is how they use texts & social media posts as evidence of conspiracy, of violent intent, of intent to interfere. No recognition that people post or resend a lot of stuff on social media without giving much thought. Even anti-masking statements are used as evidence of guilty intent."

 

"Statements questioning election security or commenting on irregularities or critical of mail-in ballots get admitted as evidence of guilt. These statements are at the core of First Amendment protection."

 

Sounds like how Grok and the AI grade a person.

Program / strategy must be written by the same people

Anonymous ID: 1d3c7d Jan. 19, 2025, 4:20 p.m. No.22384478   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4506

>>22384381

She's not someone who wants to date you so who cares if you like her or not?

couple of good things about her; She's a vicious fighter for Donald Trump.

Also she's ugly smart.

A lot of lawyers are not. And they have no fight. They are co-opted.

She's not trying to date you, so get over yourself.

Also, she has courage. These pedos are vicious. Most journalists won't talk about the issue, because of that.

She doesn't give a fuk.

Female honeybadger.

Anonymous ID: 1d3c7d Jan. 19, 2025, 4:27 p.m. No.22384555   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22384123

noice. As it should be.

Arrogant hateful pricks they are.

Also, colluded with Treason.

 

Nature took its course with old Soros.

you'd figure he'd be as smart as David Rockefeller and learn how to avoid dementia?

Anonymous ID: 1d3c7d Jan. 19, 2025, 4:36 p.m. No.22384642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4660 >>4686

22384608

Imagine.

Tranime lingo.

 

Such gratitude to Jim W.

The scum who constantly attack him here are unbelievable.

Cry moar losers.

I hope the money is worth it.