Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 7:50 p.m. No.22386188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6194 >>6202

>>22386150

You can filter without saying use a filter.

And you can filter your mind without having to press the filter button.

If you don't want to see the critical thinking here, it is more comfortable to go back to your half-chan and cling to your past glory.

What are the possible repercussions of such blind actions that you only see what is good for you?

Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 8:06 p.m. No.22386278   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6290

>>22386202

I'm HOOOMAN.

 

Are you trying to say that you filtere because you wanted to show that your opinion is valid?

 

I guess with every statement comes accountability.

 

It feels like you're filtering out questions and critical thinking opinions because you don't have the answers.

 

Isn't that the same behavior as some bigwig trying to avoid accountability?

 

I think so.

Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 8:13 p.m. No.22386334   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22386290

> 'critical thinking' is not repetitive vain spam with nonsense and false prophecy.

 

Are you talking about what namefag has been doing that I told you about in the beginning?

Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 8:21 p.m. No.22386384   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6406 >>6420

>>22386290

The reason I am talking to this namefag is literally because firmly namefagging.

 

I was wondering the other day if namefag here might affect the anonymous environment? I asked.

But now the conversation is not going anywhere except filtered.

If you have a good reason for namefag, I would to hear it.

Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 8:33 p.m. No.22386469   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6493

>>22386420

No, at first I did too.

But then I thought the opposite.

I thought, "Isn't it important to firmly define a problem as a problem?

 

Of course, there are times when saying something is wrong is itself wrong.

But then, I also thought that it could lead to the possibility of something better being created by finding a point where the problem can be clearly improved upon.

 

What I want to say here is about silence and blindness.

 

And because I think that creating opportunities to think is constructive.

 

I think that's why they are trying so hard to namefag here.

Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 8:49 p.m. No.22386576   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6666

>>22386493

If they want to leave here and do their own cataloging and namefag, that's their own business and that's fine.

but to come here and continue this namefag, I think it's a different story.

 

Well I just say it when I see it or when I'm in the mood.

Anonymous ID: 915ad4 Jan. 19, 2025, 9:03 p.m. No.22386666   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6672

>>22386576

Also, I still get spam and such, but I am thinking that if we overwhelm them with opinions and information that is based on critical thinking that outweighs this spam, we will solve this spam problem.

Well, that's why I think it's very important to increase the number of participants here on QR.

I think a counter would be more effective for that than pretending not to see it with the filter button.

I'm thinking that it would be better to have more words on the counter, or a feeling of overwhelming the spam with more casual questions and exchanges of words.

 

I also care about this place QR, that's why I think I can only try to make a move that I hope will make this place better.