>>22393769 (pb)
huh.
Maybe Biden just doesn't like the spawn of Ukrainigarch Marxists from Kiev who act like they run America and self deal and blackmail and act like overlords?
>>22393769 (pb)
huh.
Maybe Biden just doesn't like the spawn of Ukrainigarch Marxists from Kiev who act like they run America and self deal and blackmail and act like overlords?
why are you here today?
no one is going to be persuaded by your badgering bit, putting words in other people's mouths.
wow.
you don't even know History at all.
King David was annointed by God.
you should go learn something.
the 'gottcha.'
you understand what I am saying even if 'technically' I didn't get it exact.
anon, a King can be a moral person.
I personally don't think that we should have kings anymore.
But I'm not going to make the slander that anyone who is a king is an anti-christ.
Why don't you just enjoy the day.
If you can't celebrate the inauguration, you can still celebrate the memory of Martin Luther King Jr.
you're a shill pejoratator who likes to start fights.
should I quote you the 110th Psalm?
are you saying I'm correct? my point is being a king doesn't make you and antichrist.
your ignorance is Legion, anon
ah, it's you.
you're the one who condemns people saying 'you don't know the truth'
but I figured out your a script because you get stuck on that. I've flayed you over and over in these breads, so much so that all I have to say to you is 'by their fruits you shall know them.'
your fruit is conflict and discord.
good bye.
listen to you calling men who ascend to become kings anti-christs.
that seems to me to be condemnation.
you want me to waste my time arguing this.
that's the fruit you want.
your fruit is conflict and discord.
end of story.
you claim truth but you show the spirit of badgering and conflict by your insistence of constantly tagging back to me just because I tell you that you are condemning people.
kings are people. Jesus is their king too.
you just don't get it.
plese do not tag me back again.
that will just be further confirmation that you are a conflict script without discernment.
It's easy to make the mistake that everyone else is exactly like you, anon.
Saint Stephen of Hungry was NOT an anti-christ.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_I_of_Hungary
King David was not.
there is a long list of rightous royals.
you, being a program and script wouldn't know about them
there is no 'you'
you're a script in a computer who just parrots out text that is in an if-than-else or nested case statement.
sorry to be the one to have to tell you that.
you tell nothing but stuff you think will generate a conflict response. you condemn historical figures who were in leadership roles.
you're not a real person. you can only dance around quoting fragments of scripture out of context to use them to condemn me for daring to tell you : Kings are not antichrists.
you slander kings and I say you slander them
your limited use of scripture is also a tell.