>>22394721

>If it's not POTUS could it be something else dressed up as a regular bible?

Neither the Bible nor any book has any significance to taking an oath of office. Presidents have been sworn in without a Bible, or using a substitute for the Bible. Article 6 Clause 3:

But even though it's done so often, is it a requirement? The answer is, quite simply, no. It's the oath that matters, not the item

Is a Bible required to take the Oath of Office?

https://www.rocketcitynow.com/article/news/nation-world/do-you-have-to-use-a-bible-to-take-the-oath-of-office/525-9860ec72-6412-47e3-aff1-835860f28e43

Article VI Supreme Law

Clause 3 Oaths of Office

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-6/clause-3/

>>22394721

>who provides the bibles for the swearing in ceremony?

Trump used his own Bible, which was given to him by his mother, and the Lincoln Bible for his swearing-in ceremony.

The Lincoln Bible was provided during Lincoln’s 1861 inauguration by William Thomas Carroll, clerk of the Supreme Court. That’s because Lincoln’s family Bible was still packed and on its way to Washington from Springfield, Illinois, along with the Lincoln family’s other belongings.

In 2017, Trump also stacked a family Bible atop Lincoln’s while taking the oath.

https://www.wbaltv.com/article/trump-bible-inauguration/63485597

>>22394815

>Trump was right not to put his hand on the bible.

John Quincy Adams chose to place his hand on a book of constitutional law, believing it better represented the secular nature of his duties.

Thomas Jefferson did not use a Bible.

Theodore Roosevelt did not use any book during his first swearing-in following William McKinley's assassination.

Calvin Coolidge, in keeping with his Puritan roots, did not use a Bible, although one was nearby.

Lyndon Johnson, sworn in on Air Force One after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, used a Missal (Catholic liturgical book) found in the plane's bedroom.

https://www.rocketcitynow.com/article/news/nation-world/do-you-have-to-use-a-bible-to-take-the-oath-of-office/525-9860ec72-6412-47e3-aff1-835860f28e43

>>22394795

>It is curious that Trump did emphasize not forgetting God in his inaugural speech.

Trump also cited 'Two Corinthians' in a speech. Not being critical. Some people understand the Divine without the need for scripture, others pretend to understand because of peer pressure and cultural expectations.

>>22394859

>James 5:12

Matthew 5:33

“Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.’ But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.

>Trump lives by this

Many politicians - even men like President Trump - have been forced by demographics, public expectations, tradition, and other factors - to pay lip service to Christianity with the premise that the rubes (voters) expect it. No disrespect to Christians or President Trump intended. Any POTUS, even Islamic-oriented individuals, would by necessity have to appear Christian to be elected POTUS.

>>22394883

>Battle Hymn of the Republic

> - US Army Field Band

Nov 22, 2016

26,132,541 views

This was posted at CBTS back in the day and was quite popular during the flying bread phase of the Q op. Glad to see it still.

>>22395095

In the 1886 case Ex parte Garland, the Court referred to the President’s authority to pardon as unlimited except in cases of impeachment, extending to every offence known to the law and able to be exercised either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-1/ALDE_00013316/

ArtII.S2.C1.3.1 Overview of Pardon Power

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:

>>22395118

>Except for Hunter, he may get a pass

Hunter gave them all up in exchange for pardons, Anon.

Why would H. Biden have such material on his laptop?

How was the content originally received?

Email?

Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?]

On purpose [years of being treated poorly by 'Pop'] or simple negligence?

If such information existed on laptop why wouldn't contents be claimed?

Several attempts made to contact to claim?

Messages left?

Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim knowing the contents on the drive could bury Pops & family.

A troubled life?

A troubled family?

Looks can be deceiving.

Q

4891

Oct 18, 2020

>>22395201

>You trying to say

Hunter gave them all up in exchange for pardons.

There was no 'laptop' as evidence until one was created. The 'laptop' is a polite fiction as a means of entering intercepts and surveillance into evidence. 'Hunter's "laptop"' is a euphemism for Biden Family corruption as intercepted by friendly forces and then 'exposed' by Hunter Biden in exchange for Biden Family pardons.

How was the content originally received?

Email?

Q

>>22395248

>This is my wife.

>Any questions?

Does it hurt, Anon?

>>22395313

>Do you really think no one was inside his devices?

It sounds like you might have been, Anon. And that's just gross.

>>22395329

>>Who wrote this guy's bullshit?

It's copspeak, just not in CAPS.