State Dept. officials resigning en masse.

Scores of senior career diplomats are resigning from the State Department effective at noon on Monday after receiving instructions to do so from President-elect Donald Trump’s aides. This mass resignation marks a significant shift in the State Department as the Trump administration prepares to take office.

The resignations include high-ranking officials who have served under multiple administrations, both Democratic and Republican. These diplomats have been asked to step down to make way for new appointees who align with President-elect Trump’s vision for the State Department. This move is seen as part of a broader effort to reshape the department and implement Trump’s foreign policy agenda.

One of the key figures resigning is John Bass, the State Department’s acting undersecretary for political affairs. Bass, along with other senior diplomats, has been instrumental in shaping U.S. foreign policy over the years. Their departure raises questions about the future direction of the State Department and its ability to navigate complex international issues.

A spokesperson for the Trump transition team defended the move, stating that it is “entirely appropriate for the transition to seek officials who share President Trump’s vision for putting our nation and America’s working men and women first.” The spokesperson emphasized the need for a committed team focused on the same goals to address the failures of previous administrations.

The mass resignation of senior diplomats is not unprecedented, but the scale and timing of these departures are notable. It signals a significant change in the State Department’s leadership and could have far-reaching implications for U.S. foreign policy. The incoming administration has indicated plans to appoint new leaders who will bring fresh perspectives and align with Trump’s vision for the department.

As the Trump administration prepares to take office, there are concerns about potential disruptions in the State Department’s operations. The departure of experienced diplomats could lead to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, impacting the department’s ability to effectively manage international relations.

In the coming days, it will be crucial to monitor how the State Department adapts to these changes and how the new appointees will shape U.S. foreign policy. The transition period is always a time of uncertainty, but the scale of these resignations adds an extra layer of complexity to the process.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-state-dept-diplomats-resign-055740273.html

https://www.democracynow.org/2024/12/26/michael_casey_resigns_over_gaza

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-transition-team-asks-3-163951701.html

https://news.yahoo.com/news/trump-transition-team-asks-3-163951701.html

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/management/2025/01/rubio-details-plan-to-make-state-department-relevant-again-under-trump/

https://news.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-trump-team-asks-three-163703272.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-special-envoys-confusion-rcna186448

>>22394777

Fuck resign - death penalty

Donald Trump: Rebranding Globalism as Nationalism

Many assumed Trump’s remarks were only facetious. Or were they? Just two days later, at a press conference, Trump said he wanted to incorporate Greenland into the United States. Although this, too, was widely dismissed as absurd, Trump quickly underscored his seriousness by sending Donald Trump, Jr., on a trip to Greenland.

All this is being heralded to the President’s followers as part of his plan to “Make America Great Again.”

To the contrary, Trump’s ambition to expand America is nothing more than a repackaging of an old satanic plan to establish world government through regional stepping stones.

To research my first book The Shadows of Power (1988), a study of the globalist power brokers at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), I went through every issue of Foreign Affairs, the CFR’s flagship journal, going back to its first issue in 1922. There was no Internet then, no search engines. All facts had to be gleaned from hard-copy documents.

In going through Foreign Affairs, I recognized that the CFR had abandoned the idea of, in one swoop, unifying the planet under a world government. Instead, they reasoned, they could gradually bring about global governance by first organizing regional alliances. This would be a “stepping stone” approach (also known as “boiling the frog”) to the ultimate goal of an all-powerful one-world government.

For example, we read in the January 1926 issue of Foreign Affairs:

Locarno [a European collective security agreement] represents an attempt to arrive at the same end by stages,—by treaties and local regional pacts which are permeated with the spirit of the Geneva Protocol,—these to be constantly supplemented, until at last, within the framework of the League of Nations, they are absorbed by one great world convention guaranteeing world security and peace by the enforcing of the rule of law in inter-state life.1

Shortly after America joined NATO in 1949, Elmo Roper of the CFR issued a pamphlet entitled “The Goal is Government of All the World” in which he mused:

But the Atlantic Pact (NATO) need not be our last effort toward greater unity. It can be converted into one more sound and important step working toward world peace. It can be one of the most positive moves in the direction of One World.2

In his April 1964 article for Foreign Affairs, “The World Order in the Sixties,” Roberto Ducci wrote:

Pending the formation of such wider and more responsible political units, encouragement should be given to regional organizations, of the type recognized by the U.N. Charter. They should be strengthened so as to make them able to keep the peace in their respective areas: NATO in the North Atlantic and the Council of Europe in the European regions, O.A.S in the Americas, O.A.U. in Africa, SEATO in Southeast Asia.3

https://jamesperloff.net/donald-trump-rebranding-globalism-as-nationalism/

>>22394899

It isn’t my intention to assert that America will really merge with Canada and Greenland, a complicated process that would face many barriers. However, it is important to understand that Trump’s ambition toward this goal is neither new nor patriotric, but an element of the age-old globalist agenda.

NOTES

1. Eduard Benes, “After Locarno: The Problem of Security Today,” Foreign Affairs (January 1926): 210.

2. Phoebe and Kent Courtney, America’s Unelected Rulers: The Council on Foreign Relations (New Orleans: Conservative Society of America, 1962), 51.

3. Roberto Ducci, “The World Order in the Sixties,” Foreign Affairs (April 1964): 389-90.

4. As quoted by Hilaire du Berrier in “The New World Order Story,” H du B Reports (March 1997): 4.

5. AZ Quotes, https://www.azquotes.com/quote/654883?form=MG0AV3

6. James Perloff, Truth Is a Lonely Warrior: Unmasking the Forces Behind Global Destruction (Burlington, Mass.: Refuge Books, 2013), 72-74. The quotations within the block quote include Robert Pastor, “North America’s Second Decade,” Foreign Affairs (January-February 2004): 125, 133; and Dennis Behreandt, “Creating the North American Union,” The New American (October 2, 2006): 9.