>>22394695 LB

I haven't condemned anyone, that's an accusation YOU make based on you misunderstanding what it means that a king is by definition antiChrist. I'm not condemning them by saying that, as they are not condemned by it. I do not slander I tell you the Truth, anyone who claims royal authority over another denies Him in them and is by very definition Anti-Christ. Many anti-Christs have come. When a Son sets you free you are free indeed. Jesus told you we are One in Him. Those who are waiting for a king to come back can not see, when Jesus comes back is when power is returned to the People. No kings.

>>22394952

Which would make them liars and no better than any other politician.

>>22395019

If it's legit the next president can't do anything about it.

>>22395095

False. Nixon was pardoned without ever being charged.