Anonymous ID: 4cc911 Jan. 20, 2025, 5:30 p.m. No.22397347   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7357 >>7468

>>22397172

>Tomorrow's delta, maybe Q will return

So sad. Have you ever read Q? It is worth it, even years after it happened if you can place yourself in the then current timeline. There are still a few here who lived it and have perspective on the context of the drops. Number matching and datefagging are a failed approach. Understand it as an information operation that froze or fooled an adversary while encouraging the globe.

Anonymous ID: 4cc911 Jan. 20, 2025, 5:38 p.m. No.22397419   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22397357

>had to burn a fresh ip to drop that claim hey?

>kek

No. Legit question and commentary for the consideration of all Anons who take the time to read it. No need to make light of it or use humor to dismiss it, Anon. If you are unable to engage intellectually, I fully understand.

Anonymous ID: 4cc911 Jan. 20, 2025, 6:08 p.m. No.22397739   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22397651

>Maybe the now older son, then?

There are those who have engaged with that notion. Can't vouch for the validity or value of that line of thinking, Anon.