Anonymous ID: 8715ef July 22, 2018, 6:36 a.m. No.2240324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0359

>>2240306

Relative difference between two observers (or objects) or change is a standard in our physics. Are you implying that binary should be changed to a trinary system on off and change?

Anonymous ID: 8715ef July 22, 2018, 6:45 a.m. No.2240382   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0400

>>2240359

well in that trinary system all change would be smaller than 1 (or fractal) and would basically be a rotation angle of the the difference between 0 and 1 and the hypotenuse would be the value of the third (change number). All Binary actions would remain binary as the change would remain 0 or 1.

Anonymous ID: 8715ef July 22, 2018, 6:51 a.m. No.2240428   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2240400

I don't see how as 2 is reducible to one and would artificially seem to warp the system. You can call it two but mathematically it would warp the system if the trinary point is a 2. Basically the fractal trinary is based on a rotated axis 90 degrees from the binary axis and solved for the hypotenuse (so yea it is kinda a 2).

Anonymous ID: 8715ef July 22, 2018, 6:58 a.m. No.2240462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0471 >>0473

>>2240400

If you were to make a trinary computer it would have to have a 3D array computing structure (well you could do it with a 2D and add a process of spinning and solving for the value of change (3)).

Anonymous ID: 8715ef July 22, 2018, 7:16 a.m. No.2240549   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0669

>>2240473

It sounds the same to me. The quantum state is superimposed on say the Y axis until you spin the axis to divide the superposition to reveal the two possible positions and their 'difference'. It sounds the same to me as a fractal rotation.

Anonymous ID: 8715ef July 22, 2018, 7:27 a.m. No.2240622   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2240473

if you think of quantum superposition as viewing the particle or wave into the Y axis - the particle is potential into the axis 90 degrees into the page (X' axis) and is only defined when the axis is rotated to view that Y over X' axis.