dChan
Anonymous ID: 3aebad Jan. 22, 2025, 9:12 a.m. No.22410922   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1005 >>1028 >>1042 >>1076 >>1426 >>1446 >>1470 >>1701 >>1777

Road map of where we are and where we are going.

 

Today is January 22 2025 and DJT ordered DOJ to investigate any Governor or Mayor interfering with his executive orders regarding invasion.

on this day in History 1864 SCOTUS heard arguments on Ex parte Vallandigham. Vallandigham, after being warned several times to stop his aid and comfort to the enemy with his speeches against Lincoln and the Union, He refused to stop and was tried as a traitor in a military tribunal. He was convicted but later reversed in EX PARTE MILLIGAN where the ruling said the military had the power to detain him and hold him until the rebellion was put down and civilian Court then try him for treason.

 

Treason can only be met if there is a declared war, a declared enemy, and 2 witnesses.

DJT declared invasion putting our Country in a war -like State. Acting against the Country at this point is an act of war against the Country. Cartels are labeled terrorists and a National Emergency has been declared.

Tom Homan has been warning about Politicians violating obstruction laws, the game just changed. It is now treason.

We do have functioning Civilian Courts as per Milligan, but we have an added terrorist declaration that changes the game from Military holding traitors until the invasion is over to enemy combatant status.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/68/243/

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/

Anonymous ID: 3aebad Jan. 22, 2025, 11:12 a.m. No.22411780   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22411426 That Q&A between Graham and Kavanaugh starts at 2:29:30 it discusses enemy combatant as American citizen joining foreign terrorists and acting against American soldiers on foreign soil. Enemy Combatant also exists during invasion. Here is a blurb about the concept pre EX PARTE MILLIGAN that did not recognize aiding the enemy as enemy combatant ( or belligerent ) . It is Vallandigham that takes the position of it being treason and Milligan stating they must be tried in civilian Court. Later Hamdi case coined the phrase enemy combatant and permitted indefinite detention without charges, and military court.

A combatant has the right to question their status in a Court but it is sure to fail while an invasion is ongoing. SCOTUS would then risk becoming a combatant themselves once the President has declared invasion

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R42337