Mike Johnson Ruins The 'Motion To Vacate,' Disrespecting Thomas Jefferson. Con Inc is always plotting….
https://nationalfile.com/mike-johnson-ruins-the-motion-to-vacate-disrespecting-thomas-jefferson/
Need some clarity:
ENDING ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION AND
RESTORING MERIT-BASED OPPORTUNITY
January 21, 2025
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity/
It has been brought to my attention that this executive order may or may NOT eliminate "affirmative action" for federal government employees (the civil service).
Section 2 states:
"Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work. I therefore order all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, activities, guidance, regulations, enforcement actions, consent orders, and requirements. I further order all agencies to enforce our longstanding civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities."
Section 3 states in part:
"Sec. 3. Terminating Illegal Discrimination in the Federal Government. (a) The following executive actions are hereby revoked:"
Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), which has been revoked, applies to Federal government CONTRACTORS (i.e. NOT Federal government EMPLOYEES).
IS "Affirmative Action" STATUTE, or EO ?
If it is STATUTE, then Trump alone cannot change it.
(IMO, "Affirmative Action" IS de facto "discrimination")
A new memorandum lays out the direction.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/doj-directs-prosecutors-to-probe-officials-who-obstruct-immigration-enforcement-5796911?utm_source=gab&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=etgab
Supreme Court Denies RFK Jr.’s Request to Block California’s Doctor Investigations Over COVID-19 Advice
The Ninth Circuit rejected the injunction request in November 2024 after a federal district court did the same seven months before.
86
49
Save
Supreme Court Denies RFK Jr.’s Request to Block California’s Doctor Investigations Over COVID-19 Advice
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan stands during a group photograph of the justices at the Supreme Court in Washington, on April 23, 2021. Erin Schaff/AFP via Getty Images
Matthew Vadum
By Matthew Vadum
1/22/2025
Updated:
1/22/2025
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-denies-rfk-jr-s-request-to-block-californias-doctor-investigations-over-covid-19-advice-5796626?utm_source=gab&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=etgab
Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy reinstated on second day in office
https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/trumps-remain-in-mexico-policy-reinstated-on-second-day-in-office/
A top official in the Trump administration has authorized immigration officers to make arrests at schools and churches.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-government-authorizes-arrests-of-illegal-immigrants-at-schools-churches-5796833?utm_source=gab&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=etgab
NEW - Iraq's parliament passes a law that legalizes marriage for girls as young as nine years.
https://www.disclose.tv/id/ague4z1c8x/
SCOTUS ISSUES OPINIONS.
SCOTUS is NOT supposed to LEGISLATE, nor can they ENFORCE LAW.
CONGRESS IS THE LEGISLATURE.
(although they have shown themselves to be as useless as a cunt on a Nun on a good day, and a threat to the Republic on most other days)
Marbury v. Madison (1803): “A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.”
(Trump would be wise to use THIS !)
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/marbury-v-madison
Yes.
But I don't think we agree on how to get there.
(We are NOT voting, legislating, or litigating our way out of this mess)
DO NOT BE MISLED BY "CON INC.