Darn, guess they aren't adults, haven't developed wings yet.
TYB
Do everyone a favor as well as your self then. Leave it.
Ok.
Ol' Roy Orbison had a great voice.
Never did twatter and have no desire to. Sorry Elon.
Psalm 40[a]
For the director of music. Of David. A psalm.
1
I waited patiently for the Lord;
he turned to me and heard my cry.
2
He lifted me out of the slimy pit,
out of the mud and mire;
he set my feet on a rock
and gave me a firm place to stand.
3
He put a new song in my mouth,
a hymn of praise to our God.
Many will see and fear the Lord
and put their trust in him.
No, I think it was he BELIEVED God and took Him at His word. He was a good steward.
I think it might be a good idea to require physical gold and/or silver for at least some of those tariffs.
KEK!
WTF are you talking about?
Well Thailand used to be called Siam.
No idea why there is a pistol on this video. Makes no sense.
I don't use google if I can help it.
I think Asimov was living in Ceylon.
Nope, drink his wine.
Jeremiah was a bullfrog
Was a good friend of mine
I never understood a single word he said
But I helped him a-drink his wine
And he always had some mighty fine wine
Singin’
Fuck google. I use duckduckgo.
The American people.
Laugh all you want, you just sound like your gargling with that dick in your mouth.
Well, been dealing with shills constantly, so…trigger happy.
Fly the friendly skies.
I really want to see Ratskin do a perp walk.
Something really needs to be done about wikipedia. There is so much shit floating around in that cesspool. They try to claim unbiased, but they are biased as fuck.
Try it some time. If you edit something that goes against what they want you to believe, or point out flaws, they will dog you and shut you out. Quite a few shit bags seem to be running around unchecked on that site.
They use it to try and create/enforce their personal opinions and if you challenge them, they start quoting their own self created rules.
That would help some at least. Probably depends on how the law works regarding that particular entity. They hate it when someone tries to challenge their bullshit and just enforce their own self created rules to boot you out.
Thing is, one of the things they like to play with are words. Words like "facts." They think the term is pliable. It's only a fact if they say so.
I suspect you will find quite a few antifa/anarchists/atheists etc controlling/editing those pages.
If you are talking religion, "they" are self proclaimed militant atheists.
Don't take my word for it. Go see for yourself.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia[c] is a free-content online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers, known as Wikipedians, through open collaboration and the wiki software MediaWiki. Wikipedia is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3][4] and is consistently ranked among the ten most visited websites; as of December 2024, it was ranked fifth by Semrush,[5] and seventh by Similarweb.[6] Founded by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger on January 15, 2001, Wikipedia has been hosted since 2003 by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American nonprofit organization funded mainly by donations from readers.[7]
Initially only available in English, Wikipedia now exists in more than 300 languages. The English Wikipedia, with over 6.9 million articles, remains the largest of the editions, which together comprise more than 64 million articles and attract more than 1.5 billion unique device visits and 13 million edits per month (about 5 edits per second on average) as of April 2024.[W 1] As of November 2024, over 25% of Wikipedia's traffic was from the United States, followed by Japan at 6.2%, the United Kingdom at 5.6%, Russia at 5.0%, Germany at 4.8%, and the remaining 53.3% split among other countries.[8]
Wikipedia has been praised for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, and culture. Wikipedia has been censored by some national governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site.[9][10] Although Wikipedia's volunteer editors have written extensively on a wide variety of topics, the encyclopedia has been criticized for systemic bias, such as a gender bias against women and geographical bias against the Global South (Eurocentrism).[11][12] While the reliability of Wikipedia was frequently criticized in the 2000s, it has improved over time, receiving greater praise from the late 2010s onward[3][13][14] while becoming an important fact-checking site.[15][16] Articles on breaking news are often accessed as sources for frequently updated information about those events.[17][18]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia
Probably could use a nice deep dig into.