Anonymous ID: 6582be Jan. 23, 2025, 3:12 a.m. No.22417137   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22417078

I'll trust Trump when he admits we can't win a war with Russia and/or China, and stops these endless wars, brings our troops home and deals with all the bullshit here at home. Until then, I'm waiting and watching the shit show unfold as usual.

Anonymous ID: 6582be Jan. 23, 2025, 3:19 a.m. No.22417155   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22417151

Open the door, tell him you are armed and want him off your property, tell him you live in a "Stand Your Ground State" where you legally can defend yourself and private property. He'll leave if he knows what is good for him.

Anonymous ID: 6582be Jan. 23, 2025, 3:28 a.m. No.22417182   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7189 >>7273

>>22417164

You have to issue the warning first to refrain from your private property. If, after doing so, they still refuse to leave, you then have the right to defend your private property, lethally, in a "stand your ground" or "castle doctrine" State. The warning must be issued first though, and only when someone is refusing to leave your property.

Anonymous ID: 6582be Jan. 23, 2025, 3:46 a.m. No.22417249   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7260

>>22417232

>So not think you can shoot trespassers, legally, unless they are armed.

 

If they pose a threat you can, but you have to issue a warning to refrain from your private property and you can only engage them if they are hostile, refusing to leave your property. Thus, posing a threat.

Anonymous ID: 6582be Jan. 23, 2025, 3:57 a.m. No.22417297   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7299 >>7361

>>22417260

Interesting, not a bad idea.

 

https://legaldictionary.net/castle-doctrine/

 

"The term castle doctrine refers to the legal right of a person to defend himself against an intruder in his home or other property, even should the use of deadly force be required. Under this legal theory, the homeowner is not required to retreat, but may stand his ground to defend himself, his home, or his property."

 

"When an intruder comes onto a personโ€™s property, or into his home or business, for the purpose of committing a felony, or to cause bodily harm to the inhabitants, how much force that person can use in self protection varies by state. Castle doctrine holds that a person in his home, on his property, or in his place of business may use deadly force to protect himself from violent attack."

 

So my question is, when does the intruder impose a risk to you or your property?

Do they impose a risk after you warned them to leave and they refuse to leave?โ€ฆ Or must they be hostile and start to attack you or vandalize your property?