Anonymous ID: a3c283 Jan. 23, 2025, 7:15 a.m. No.22418307   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8313 >>8314 >>8322 >>8373

>>22418135

>>22418146

 

> ?

> if x then y

 

problem is we don't have enough info about ANY of what we're shown. ANY of it. there's so much disinfo, accidental disinfo, intentional disinfo, misinterpreted, partially revealed, jumped conclusions.

 

there's no possible way to know. even those who appear to be objectively good, selfless, for the right reasons people can be wolves.

 

i think that's part the point of the whole Q exercise.

 

never stop questioning what's in front of you.

Anonymous ID: a3c283 Jan. 23, 2025, 7:21 a.m. No.22418340   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22418313

 

lol not trying to doubtfag but if you objectively know something that's just for you. it's extremely difficult to objectively prove anything anonymously. it's extremely difficult for anyone in the famefag/politifag-spheres to prove a) what they know and b) how/why they know it and further c) whether or not what they know is objective truth.

 

and I'm definitely not speaking for everyone when i say "i think x" so you can gfy